HP | PDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HP's Valuation (26) in the Contract Drilling industry is significantly better than the same rating for PDS (96). This means that HP’s stock grew significantly faster than PDS’s over the last 12 months.
PDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as HP (66). This means that PDS’s stock grew similarly to HP’s over the last 12 months.
PDS's SMR Rating (91) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as HP (92). This means that PDS’s stock grew similarly to HP’s over the last 12 months.
HP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as PDS (47). This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to PDS’s over the last 12 months.
PDS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Contract Drilling industry is significantly better than the same rating for HP (74). This means that PDS’s stock grew significantly faster than HP’s over the last 12 months.
| HP | PDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HP (@Contract Drilling) experienced а +3.42% price change this week, while PDS (@Contract Drilling) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +5.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.23%.
HP is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
PDS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BKCI | 52.19 | 0.53 | +1.04% |
| BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) | |||
| TGLR | 39.65 | 0.27 | +0.69% |
| Wedbush LAFFER TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) | |||
| EBND | 20.65 | 0.07 | +0.34% |
| State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) | |||
| GMF | 154.60 | N/A | N/A |
| State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) | |||
| LIAM | 216.36 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2055 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAM) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDS has been closely correlated with HP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDS jumps, then HP could also see price increases.