Rollins, Inc. (ROL) and Service Corporation International (SCI) represent essential services in pest control and deathcare, respectively, offering recurring revenue streams resilient to economic cycles. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers, aiding traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing stable dividends. With both exhibiting solid fundamentals amid varying sector dynamics, understanding their relative strengths helps in portfolio diversification within consumer services.
Rollins, Inc. (ROL) is a leading provider of pest and wildlife control services to residential and commercial customers across the U.S. and internationally. The company focuses on protection against termites, rodents, insects, and more, serving sectors like healthcare and logistics. Trading near $56 with a market cap of $27 billion, ROL carries a trailing P/E ratio of 52 and forward P/E of 45, reflecting growth expectations. In recent market activity, shares gained about 5% over the past month and 6% YTD, supported by Q1 2026 results showing 10% revenue growth to $906 million from organic gains and M&A, though margins softened. Positive sentiment stems from strategic expansions and technology investments, positioning ROL for continued demand in hygiene services.
Service Corporation International (SCI), North America's largest deathcare provider, operates funeral homes, cemeteries, and crematoria under brands like Dignity Memorial. It offers end-to-end services including merchandise and pre-planning. At around $88 per share and $12 billion market cap, SCI trades at a trailing P/E of 23 and forward P/E of 21, with EPS of $3.80. Recent weeks saw shares rise over 12% monthly and 13% YTD, buoyed by steady demand and analyst optimism ahead of Q1 earnings. Factors influencing performance include demographic trends and operational efficiencies, fostering a defensive posture with resilient cash flows in consumer staples-like services.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, designed for stocks, ETFs, and crypto across diverse strategies like momentum, volatility, and sector rotation. These bots showcase impressive stats: annualized returns up to 168%, win rates from 48% to 88%, profit factors exceeding 11, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 21. Timeframes range from intraday (hours) to swing (weeks), with multi-ticker portfolios targeting semiconductors, energy, and small-caps. Employing machine learning for trend detection and risk-managed take-profit/stop-loss corridors, they adapt to current conditions. Traders can copy these for automated execution, potentially enhancing returns in volatile markets. Explore the Trending AI Robots to find bots suited to your style.
ROL and SCI both thrive on essential, recurring services but diverge in models: ROL's cyclical pest control relies on seasonal and commercial demand with aggressive M&A growth, while SCI's deathcare benefits from predictable demographics in a defensive niche. Recent momentum tilts to SCI with superior YTD and monthly gains, versus ROL's post-earnings stability. Valuation favors SCI's lower P/E, trading at a discount despite comparable dividends. Risks include ROL's margin sensitivity to labor costs and SCI's regulatory exposure. Market sentiment leans positive for both, but SCI edges on stability amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron's AI currently favors SCI over ROL, driven by stronger trend consistency, lower valuation multiples, and defensive sector positioning with higher YTD returns. While ROL shows robust growth catalysts, SCI's relative stability and analyst upside suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, barring major shifts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ROL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ROL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ROL (@Personnel Services) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while SCI (@Personnel Services) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -4.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -31.43%.
ROL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
SCI is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
| ROL | SCI | ROL / SCI | |
| Capitalization | 21.6B | 10B | 216% |
| EBITDA | 860M | 1.32B | 65% |
| Gain YTD | -24.609 | -6.017 | 409% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.33 | 19.16 | 216% |
| Revenue | 3.85B | 4.33B | 89% |
| Total Cash | 117M | 159M | 74% |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | 5.16B | 21% |
ROL | SCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCI's Valuation (18) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ROL (85). This means that SCI’s stock grew significantly faster than ROL’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ROL (65). This means that SCI’s stock grew similarly to ROL’s over the last 12 months.
ROL's SMR Rating (25) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SCI (31). This means that ROL’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
ROL's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SCI (70). This means that ROL’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ROL (78). This means that SCI’s stock grew similarly to ROL’s over the last 12 months.
| ROL | SCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 57% | 11 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 18 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 40% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROL has been loosely correlated with SCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROL jumps, then SCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROL | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| SCI - ROL | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CSV - ROL | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| HRB - ROL | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.66% | ||
| FTDR - ROL | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
| BKNG - ROL | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCI has been loosely correlated with CSV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCI jumps, then CSV could also see price increases.