HSBC
Price
$48.21
Change
-$1.16 (-2.35%)
Updated
Apr 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
148.14B
26 days until earnings call
MUFG
Price
$11.10
Change
-$0.74 (-6.25%)
Updated
Apr 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
116.09B
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HSBC vs MUFG

Header iconHSBC vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts HSBC vs MUFGBanner chart's image
HSBC Holdings
Price$48.21
Change-$1.16 (-2.35%)
Volume$16.06K
Capitalization148.14B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$11.10
Change-$0.74 (-6.25%)
Volume$56.29K
Capitalization116.09B
HSBC vs MUFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
HSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HSBC vs. MUFG commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSBC is a Hold and MUFG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HSBC: $49.37 vs. MUFG: $11.84)
Brand notoriety: HSBC: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSBC: 180% vs. MUFG: 175%
Market capitalization -- HSBC: $148.14B vs. MUFG: $116.09B
HSBC [@Major Banks] is valued at $148.14B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $116.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HSBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSBC is a better buy in the long-term than MUFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HSBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than HSBC.

Price Growth

HSBC (@Major Banks) experienced а -14.84% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was -10.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +60.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +59.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

HSBC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+60.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSBC($148B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($116B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than HSBC: MUFG (8.85) vs HSBC (6.90). HSBC YTD gains are higher at: 2.929 vs. MUFG (1.024). HSBC has less debt than MUFG: HSBC (235B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than HSBC: MUFG (5.66T) vs HSBC (63B).
HSBCMUFGHSBC / MUFG
Capitalization148B116B128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.9291.024286%
P/E Ratio6.908.8578%
Revenue63B5.66T1%
Total Cash286BN/A-
Total Debt235B48.64T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSBC vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
HSBC
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6985
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1212
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3125
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HSBC's Valuation (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (60). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (12). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (1). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (59). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HSBC (31). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to HSBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSBCMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HXL53.265.77
+12.15%
Hexcel Corp
ROK242.4323.46
+10.71%
Rockwell Automation
LQDA12.750.76
+6.34%
Liquidia Corp
LEXX1.400.07
+5.26%
Lexaria Bioscience Corp
SFST32.021.28
+4.16%
Southern First Bancshares

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+9.73%
SMFG - MUFG
91%
Closely correlated
+10.04%
C - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
+9.15%
WFC - MUFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+6.85%
BAC - MUFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+6.05%
JPM - MUFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+8.06%
More