HSBC
Price
$107.25
Change
+$4.65 (+4.53%)
Updated
Jul 30, 11:23 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
352.86B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBS
Price
$52.94
Change
+$1.14 (+2.20%)
Updated
Jul 30, 11:33 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
171.26B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HSBC vs UBS

HSBC vs UBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) vs. UBS Group AG (UBS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) has delivered stronger year-to-date returns compared to UBS Group AG (UBS), supported by its Asia-focused operations and resilient net interest income (NII).
  • UBS Group AG (UBS) maintains a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, reflecting market expectations around its wealth management franchise and ongoing integration following the Credit Suisse acquisition.
  • Market capitalization favors HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) at approximately $338 billion versus roughly $172 billion for UBS Group AG (UBS).
  • Both banks operate in the global financial services sector, with HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) emphasizing emerging markets exposure and UBS Group AG (UBS) leveraging Swiss private banking strengths.
  • Recent market activity shows HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) trading near 52-week highs, while UBS Group AG (UBS) exhibits comparatively steadier but lower momentum in the same period.
  • Sector sentiment remains influenced by interest rate environments and regulatory developments affecting capital ratios such as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1).

Introduction

HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) and UBS Group AG (UBS) represent two prominent global banking institutions with distinct geographic and business emphases. This comparison examines their relative performance, business models, and positioning in the current market environment. Institutional investors, portfolio managers, and active traders evaluating international financial stocks may find this analysis relevant for assessing diversification opportunities within the banking sector.

HSBC Overview and Recent Performance

HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) operates as a multinational bank with significant presence in Asia, Europe, and the Americas, deriving substantial revenue from commercial banking, wealth management, and global markets activities. In recent weeks, the stock has demonstrated notable strength, closing near $103.40 on the NYSE amid broader gains that contributed to a year-to-date return exceeding 32%. Performance has been supported by robust net interest income (NII) generation and favorable positioning in high-growth Asian markets. Market sentiment reflects investor focus on the bank’s scale and dividend profile, with shares trading close to 52-week highs during the recent period.

UBS Overview and Recent Performance

UBS Group AG (UBS) functions primarily as a Swiss-headquartered wealth manager and investment bank, with expanded operations following the integration of Credit Suisse. The stock has shown more measured movement in recent market activity relative to broader sector peers, with a market capitalization around $172 billion. Key influences include steady wealth management inflows and ongoing efforts to realize cost synergies from the acquisition. Performance metrics indicate a comparatively conservative trajectory, with the shares maintaining stability amid fluctuating European banking sector conditions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most promising AI trading bots from a pool of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section, selected from totals such as 25 bots out of 351 overall. These robots encompass diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, including options focused on sectors like technology and leveraged instruments. Historical examples show annualized returns reaching up to 241% in select strategies with win rates between 70% and 80%. Readers interested in exploring adaptive AI-driven approaches can review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) and UBS Group AG (UBS) differ markedly in business emphasis: the former prioritizes broad international commercial banking with heavy Asia exposure, while the latter concentrates on premium wealth management and investment banking services centered in Europe. Recent momentum has tilted toward HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) through superior year-to-date gains and higher overall market capitalization. Risk factors include regulatory capital requirements, measured by metrics such as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratios, alongside interest rate sensitivity affecting net interest margins. Sector exposure places both within global banking, yet UBS Group AG (UBS) carries additional considerations from post-acquisition integration. Market sentiment appears more constructive toward HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) based on observable price action near recent highs, whereas UBS Group AG (UBS) offers a profile oriented toward stability in private banking revenues.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including stronger recent trend consistency, favorable year-to-date positioning, and catalysts tied to Asian market growth, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a probabilistic preference toward HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) in the current environment. UBS Group AG (UBS) presents trade-offs around its higher valuation multiples and integration-related considerations that could moderate relative momentum. This assessment reflects pattern recognition across performance data rather than forward-looking certainty.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
HSBC vs. UBS commentary
Jul 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSBC is a StrongBuy and UBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2026
Stock price -- (HSBC: $102.60 vs. UBS: $51.80)
Brand notoriety: HSBC: Notable vs. UBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSBC: 98% vs. UBS: 165%
Market capitalization -- HSBC: $352.86B vs. UBS: $171.26B
HSBC [@Major Banks] is valued at $352.86B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $171.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $916.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $209.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HSBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSBC is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSBC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HSBC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HSBC is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

HSBC (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

HSBC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.50% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSBC($353B) has a higher market cap than UBS($171B). UBS has higher P/E ratio than HSBC: UBS (32.73) vs HSBC (16.96). HSBC YTD gains are higher at: 34.833 vs. UBS (14.775). HSBC has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. UBS (210B). HSBC has less debt than UBS: HSBC (102B) vs UBS (344B). HSBC has higher revenues than UBS: HSBC (67.6B) vs UBS (49.1B).
HSBCUBSHSBC / UBS
Capitalization353B171B206%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.83314.775236%
P/E Ratio16.9632.7352%
Revenue67.6B49.1B138%
Total Cash243B210B116%
Total Debt102B344B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSBC vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
HSBC
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HSBC's Valuation (57) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (93). This means that HSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (9). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (8). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (41). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (25). This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSBCUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HSBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHRB73.63-0.45
-0.61%
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp
BKTI78.88-1.12
-1.40%
BK Technologies Corp
ORCL117.74-2.22
-1.85%
Oracle Corp
LITS0.95-0.02
-1.93%
Lite Strategy Inc.
RIOT18.24-3.00
-14.12%
Riot Platforms

HSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSBC has been closely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HSBC jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSBC
1D Price
Change %
HSBC100%
-1.06%
BCS - HSBC
77%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
SAN - HSBC
73%
Closely correlated
-4.29%
ING - HSBC
70%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
BBVA - HSBC
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
UBS - HSBC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
-0.44%
ING - UBS
67%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
BCS - UBS
66%
Closely correlated
-3.45%
SAN - UBS
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
HSBC - UBS
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
BNS - UBS
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
More