Advertisement
HSHP vs NMM
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSHP is a Buy and NMM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NMM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHSHP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NMM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HSHP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSHP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HSHP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NMM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HSHP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +9.88% price change this week, while NMM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +5.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
HSHP is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
NMM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+1.30% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| HSHP | NMM | HSHP / NMM | |
| Capitalization | 874M | 2.62B | 33% |
| EBITDA | 132M | 818M | 16% |
| Gain YTD | 119.028 | 76.197 | 156% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.24 | 6.03 | 269% |
| Revenue | 167M | 1.4B | 12% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 24M | - |
| Total Debt | 683M | 1.62B | 42% |
NMM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HSHP | NMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 26 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
Advertisement
HSHP and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSHP has been closely correlated with SHIP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HSHP jumps, then SHIP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSHP | 100% | +2.34% | ||
| SHIP - HSHP | 67% Closely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| SB - HSHP | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| SBLK - HSHP | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| NMM - HSHP | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| ASC - HSHP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
NMM and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMM has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMM jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMM | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| GSL - NMM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| HAFN - NMM | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
| GNK - NMM | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| DAC - NMM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| CMRE - NMM | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||