Advertisement
HUBS vs NTNX
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HubSpot (HUBS) vs. Nutanix (NTNX) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HUBS has experienced significant volatility, including a sharp post-earnings decline in early August followed by partial recovery in recent weeks.
- NTNX has demonstrated stronger relative momentum, with gains exceeding 20% over the past month amid solid bookings momentum.
- HUBS operates in the customer relationship management (CRM) and marketing software space, while NTNX focuses on enterprise cloud infrastructure and hyperconverged systems.
- Year-to-date performance shows NTNX advancing approximately 30% compared with a roughly 40% decline for HUBS.
- Both companies reported revenue growth in their latest quarters, though HUBS faced more pronounced analyst target reductions after its results.
- Market sentiment reflects contrasting trajectories, with infrastructure demand supporting NTNX stability and software spending caution weighing on HUBS.
Introduction
HubSpot (HUBS) and Nutanix (NTNX) represent distinct segments within the broader technology sector, offering investors exposure to customer experience software and enterprise cloud infrastructure, respectively. This comparison examines their recent price behavior, operational developments, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Professional traders and institutional investors monitoring software-as-a-service (SaaS) and infrastructure plays may find the analysis useful for assessing diversification opportunities or tactical allocation decisions between growth-oriented platforms and hardware-adjacent cloud solutions.
HubSpot (HUBS) Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot provides a cloud-based platform for marketing, sales, and customer service automation. In recent market activity, the stock has shown pronounced swings following its second-quarter earnings release, which featured revenue growth near 20% year-over-year yet prompted multiple analyst downgrades and target reductions due to tempered forward guidance. Over the past month, shares have recovered some ground with gains around 17%, though the year-to-date decline remains substantial near 40%. Sentiment has been influenced by broader software spending caution and competitive pressures in the customer relationship management space, resulting in elevated volatility relative to sector peers.
Nutanix (NTNX) Overview and Recent Performance
Nutanix delivers hyperconverged infrastructure solutions that simplify enterprise cloud deployments across hybrid environments. Recent market activity has featured consistent upward momentum, with the stock advancing more than 20% over the past month and roughly 30% year-to-date. Strong bookings trends and quarterly results that exceeded expectations have supported investor confidence, even as some analysts noted moderating growth rates and ongoing supply considerations. Performance has benefited from sustained enterprise demand for scalable infrastructure, positioning the shares with greater stability than many software names amid shifting macroeconomic signals.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing artificial intelligence trading bots from a much larger universe of hundreds available across the platform. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, robust backtested statistics, and favorable risk-adjusted metrics earn placement in this focused section. The bots encompass diverse trading styles, timeframes, and ticker universes, with many exhibiting win rates above 60% and varying profit factors in recent periods. This resource allows users to explore automated strategies tailored to individual risk tolerances and market views. Explore the full curated list on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HubSpot and Nutanix operate in complementary yet differentiated areas of the technology landscape. HUBS centers on recurring subscription revenue from marketing and sales tools, exposing it to discretionary software budgets that have faced recent pressure. In contrast, NTNX derives growth from infrastructure deployments that address core enterprise computing needs, providing a buffer during periods of selective capital expenditure. Recent momentum favors NTNX, which has posted steadier gains and narrower drawdowns, while HUBS contends with post-earnings repricing and elevated short interest. Sector exposure further differentiates the names: software application cyclicality versus infrastructure resilience. Valuation multiples reflect these contrasts, with HUBS trading at a lower normalized price-to-earnings ratio amid growth concerns and NTNX commanding a premium supported by execution visibility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and positioning amid recent catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to NTNX. The stock’s sustained upward trajectory and infrastructure demand tailwinds provide a more stable profile compared with the volatility and guidance-related pressures evident in HUBS. This assessment remains conditional on evolving market data and does not constitute investment guidance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a StrongBuy and NTNX is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTNX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTNX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTNX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- NTNX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while NTNX (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.47%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
NTNX is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-3.96% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-1.84% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| HUBS | NTNX | HUBS / NTNX | |
| Capitalization | 12.3B | 18.4B | 67% |
| EBITDA | 333M | 373M | 89% |
| Gain YTD | -38.301 | 31.670 | -121% |
| P/E Ratio | 88.11 | 13.16 | 669% |
| Revenue | 3.45B | 2.75B | 125% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 2.02B | 66% |
| Total Debt | 237M | 1.53B | 16% |
HUBS | NTNX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTNX's Valuation (73) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as NTNX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to NTNX’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as NTNX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to NTNX’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | NTNX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -2.95% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -12.69% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||
NTNX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTNX has been loosely correlated with ADSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTNX jumps, then ADSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTNX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTNX | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| ADSK - NTNX | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.26% | ||
| NOW - NTNX | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| HUBS - NTNX | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| DDOG - NTNX | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| ZS - NTNX | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.50% | ||
More | ||||