Advertisement
HUBS vs NTNX
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HubSpot (HUBS) vs. Nutanix (NTNX) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HubSpot reported strong Q1 2026 revenue growth of 23% year-over-year, beating estimates, though the stock declined sharply after the May 7 release amid broader market reactions.
- Nutanix maintains analyst support with a recent “Buy” rating maintained and trades at levels reflecting hybrid cloud demand, ahead of its Q3 fiscal 2026 earnings expected May 27.
- Both companies operate in high-growth technology sectors—customer relationship management software for HUBS and enterprise cloud infrastructure for NTNX—yet exhibit differing recent price momentum and volatility profiles.
- HUBS has faced steeper year-to-date pressure from peak levels compared with NTNX, highlighting relative performance divergence in recent market activity.
- Sector exposure differences position HUBS more toward marketing and sales automation while NTNX benefits from hybrid cloud adoption trends.
- Observable factors such as earnings consistency and upcoming catalysts inform relative positioning between the two equities in the current environment.
Introduction
HubSpot and Nutanix represent distinct segments within the broader technology sector, with HUBS focused on customer platform solutions and NTNX centered on hybrid cloud infrastructure. This comparison provides traders and investors with a factual overview of recent performance, business models, and market positioning to support informed evaluation of relative opportunities. Market participants monitoring software and cloud equities may find the analysis relevant for assessing sector-specific dynamics and recent developments.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot, Inc. develops an agentic customer platform that integrates marketing, sales, and service tools for businesses. In recent market activity, the company delivered Q1 2026 revenue of $881 million, reflecting 23% year-over-year growth and surpassing analyst expectations. Non-GAAP earnings per share reached $2.72, exceeding consensus estimates. Following the May 7 earnings release, the stock experienced an immediate decline of approximately 11.9%, with shares trading near $202 as of May 22. Sentiment reflected a combination of solid operational results and post-earnings market adjustments, contributing to continued pressure from earlier peaks amid wider technology sector movements.
NTNX Overview and Recent Performance
Nutanix, Inc. provides enterprise cloud software and hyperconverged infrastructure solutions designed for hybrid and multicloud environments. In recent market activity, the company has maintained analyst support, including a reiterated “Buy” rating. Shares closed at $47.12 on May 22, reflecting modest gains in the session. With its Q3 fiscal 2026 earnings scheduled for May 27, investor attention centers on revenue trends and guidance amid ongoing hybrid cloud demand. Performance in the period has shown relative stability compared with broader software volatility, supported by institutional positioning and operational execution in prior quarters.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Bots vary widely in trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and the specific tickers they target, enabling users to review ranges of historical win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles. The platform offers transparent statistics that help traders identify suitable automated approaches. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed comparisons.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HubSpot operates a subscription-based software-as-a-service model centered on customer engagement platforms, while Nutanix focuses on infrastructure software with recurring revenue from hybrid cloud deployments. Growth drivers differ accordingly: HUBS benefits from marketing automation adoption, whereas NTNX draws from enterprise shifts toward hybrid environments. Recent momentum shows HUBS with post-earnings volatility following its May beat, contrasting with NTNX’s steadier price action ahead of its earnings date. Risk factors include valuation sensitivity for both, with HUBS exhibiting larger drawdowns from highs and NTNX facing typical infrastructure spending cyclicality. Sector exposure places HUBS in application software and NTNX in systems infrastructure, influencing sentiment responses to macroeconomic data. Market positioning reflects these contrasts in volatility and catalyst timing.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including earnings consistency, relative price stability, and upcoming catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to NTNX in the near term. Nutanix’s steadier recent performance and hybrid cloud tailwinds contrast with HubSpot’s post-earnings adjustment, though both equities remain subject to sector-wide influences. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of trend data rather than definitive forecasts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and NTNX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTNX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTNX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTNX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- NTNX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.58% price change this week, while NTNX (@Computer Communications) price change was -4.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
NTNX is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.09% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (+1.76% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| HUBS | NTNX | HUBS / NTNX | |
| Capitalization | 9.01B | 12.7B | 71% |
| EBITDA | 267M | 373M | 72% |
| Gain YTD | -56.135 | -9.267 | 606% |
| P/E Ratio | 92.65 | 49.37 | 188% |
| Revenue | 3.3B | 2.75B | 120% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 2.02B | 84% |
| Total Debt | 247M | 1.53B | 16% |
HUBS | NTNX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTNX's Valuation (3) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as NTNX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to NTNX’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (89) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | NTNX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||
NTNX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTNX has been loosely correlated with ADSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTNX jumps, then ADSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTNX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTNX | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| ADSK - NTNX | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| NOW - NTNX | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| HUBS - NTNX | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| DDOG - NTNX | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| OKTA - NTNX | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.23% | ||
More | ||||