HUBS
Price
$558.17
Change
+$1.54 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.27B
29 days until earnings call
ZS
Price
$307.12
Change
-$6.82 (-2.17%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.79B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs ZS

Header iconHUBS vs ZS Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs ZSBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$558.17
Change+$1.54 (+0.28%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization32.27B
Zscaler
Price$307.12
Change-$6.82 (-2.17%)
Volume$22.87K
Capitalization28.79B
HUBS vs ZS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. ZS commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Buy and ZS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $556.63 vs. ZS: $313.94)
Brand notoriety: HUBS: Not notable vs. ZS: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 69% vs. ZS: 96%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $32.27B vs. ZS: $28.79B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $32.27B. ZS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $28.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZS is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than ZS.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.75% price change this week, while ZS (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.20% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($32.3B) has a higher market cap than ZS($28.8B). ZS YTD gains are higher at: 74.015 vs. HUBS (-20.113). ZS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -27.8M vs. HUBS (-81.23M). ZS has more cash in the bank: 2.46B vs. HUBS (1.39B). HUBS has less debt than ZS: HUBS (788M) vs ZS (1.23B). HUBS has higher revenues than ZS: HUBS (2.17B) vs ZS (1.9B).
HUBSZSHUBS / ZS
Capitalization32.3B28.8B112%
EBITDA-81.23M-27.8M292%
Gain YTD-20.11374.015-27%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.17B1.9B114%
Total Cash1.39B2.46B56%
Total Debt788M1.23B64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs ZS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
ZS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6283
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5751
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZS's Valuation (82) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ZS's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (57) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ZS's SMR Rating (90) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ZS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSZS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTC172.343.04
+1.80%
PTC
PGNY22.000.09
+0.41%
Progyny
PAVM0.60N/A
+0.05%
PAVmed
BWFG36.03-0.15
-0.41%
Bankwell Financial Group
CTKB3.40-0.15
-4.23%
Cytek Biosciences

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+1.09%
CRM - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
CLSK - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
SHOP - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
TEAM - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
COIN - HUBS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
More