HUT
Price
$121.32
Change
+$2.46 (+2.07%)
Updated
Jun 15, 02:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.38B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KEEL
Price
$5.66
Change
+$0.07 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jun 15, 12:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.37B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUT vs KEEL

Header iconHUT vs KEEL Comparison
Open Charts HUT vs KEELBanner chart's image
HUT vs KEEL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

HUT vs BITF Stock Comparison: AI Infrastructure Push Widens Profitability Gap in Bitcoin Mining

Key Takeaways

  • HUT demonstrates stronger profitability with positive EPS and net income, contrasting BITF's ongoing losses despite higher revenue.
  • Both stocks exhibit high volatility tied to Bitcoin prices, but HUT's recent AI data center deals have driven sharper momentum gains.
  • HUT's larger market cap and energy infrastructure scale provide greater exposure to emerging AI opportunities compared to BITF's regional mining focus.
  • Analyst sentiment leans more bullish on HUT with higher price targets, reflecting its pivot beyond pure crypto mining.
  • Risk profiles differ: HUT faces debt burdens from expansion, while BITF contends with negative cash flows and operational inefficiencies.
  • In recent market activity, HUT has outperformed BITF in year-to-date returns, underscoring divergent strategies amid sector consolidation.

Introduction

Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) are prominent players in the Bitcoin mining industry, both leveraging data centers for cryptocurrency production while navigating volatile market conditions influenced by Bitcoin's price fluctuations and energy costs. This comparison is particularly relevant for growth-oriented investors and traders interested in the crypto sector's evolution toward diversified revenue streams, such as AI infrastructure. As Bitcoin miners face post-halving pressures and rising competition, understanding their relative performance, business models, and adaptation strategies can inform decisions on portfolio allocation in a space blending traditional energy assets with emerging tech demands. Investors monitoring sector shifts, like the pivot to high-performance computing, may find insights into which firm is better positioned for sustained growth.

HUT Overview and Recent Performance

Hut 8 Corp. operates as an energy infrastructure platform centered on Bitcoin mining, with expanding operations in high-performance computing (HPC) and AI data centers. The company manages around 1,020 megawatts of capacity across 15 sites in the U.S. and Canada, holding substantial Bitcoin reserves while developing strategic colocation services. In recent weeks, HUT's stock has shown significant volatility, with notable surges driven by positive analyst upgrades and major deal announcements. A key influence on sentiment has been the company's $7 billion AI data center lease in Louisiana, signaling a successful pivot from pure mining to AI infrastructure amid demand from tech giants. This has bolstered market positioning, reflected in a year-to-date return exceeding 140%, though broader crypto market dips have led to periodic pullbacks. Financially, trailing-twelve-month revenue stands at approximately $178 million, with positive EPS of 1.94 and net income of $204 million, supporting a market cap near $5.4 billion.

BITF Overview and Recent Performance

Bitfarms Ltd. focuses on integrated Bitcoin mining through data centers in Canada, the U.S., Paraguay, and Argentina, emphasizing low-cost hydroelectric power and third-party hardware hosting. The firm has pursued fleet expansions and efficiency upgrades to counter rising mining difficulties. Over recent market activity, BITF's shares have experienced downward pressure amid Bitcoin price corrections, though inclusion in key indexes and plans for AI diversification have provided some uplift. Sentiment has been shaped by quarterly EPS growth and analyst optimism around its undervalued assets, yet operational challenges like negative cash flows persist. The stock has delivered a 66% return in 2025 thus far, with volatility amplified by sector-wide events such as Bitcoin's reclaiming of $90,000 levels. Trailing-twelve-month revenue reaches about $276 million, but EPS remains negative at -0.13, with a net loss of $70 million, contributing to a market cap of roughly $1.5 billion.

Head-to-Head Comparison

HUT and BITF share core business models in Bitcoin mining, but HUT's broader energy infrastructure and rapid AI pivot create key contrasts. HUT's scale, with over 1,000 MW capacity, supports diversified growth drivers like GPU-as-a-Service and colocation, while BITF relies more on regional expansion and cost efficiencies in hydroelectric-rich areas. Recent momentum favors HUT, with its stock surging on billion-dollar AI deals versus BITF's steadier but less explosive gains tied to mining output increases. Risk factors diverge: HUT carries higher debt (23% debt-to-equity) from ambitious expansions, exposing it to interest rate sensitivities, whereas BITF's 12% ratio comes with negative free cash flow (-$178 million TTM), heightening liquidity concerns amid energy price volatility. Sector exposure remains crypto-heavy for both, but HUT's HPC focus mitigates Bitcoin dependence more effectively. Market sentiment reflects this, with HUT attracting higher analyst targets ($63 average) compared to BITF's ($5.36), highlighting trade-offs between HUT's profitability and BITF's revenue scale in a consolidating industry.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on trend consistency and catalysts like major AI infrastructure commitments, Tickeron's AI analysis currently leans toward favoring HUT over BITF. HUT's positive earnings trajectory and strategic positioning in high-demand sectors suggest greater resilience in volatile conditions, though both remain sensitive to Bitcoin dynamics. This probabilistic assessment considers relative stability and growth potential without constituting definitive guidance.

VS
HUT vs. KEEL commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Buy and KEEL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (HUT: $118.86 vs. KEEL: $5.59)
Brand notoriety: HUT and KEEL are both not notable
HUT represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while KEEL is part of the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUT: 57% vs. KEEL: 135%
Market capitalization -- HUT: $13.38B vs. KEEL: $3.37B
HUT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $13.38B. KEEL’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $3.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $255.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKEEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KEEL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than KEEL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEEL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KEEL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than KEEL.

Price Growth

HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.90% price change this week, while KEEL (@Information Technology Services) price change was +8.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

KEEL is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.16% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Information Technology Services (+0.96% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($13.4B) has a higher market cap than KEEL($3.37B). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 158.729 vs. KEEL (137.872). KEEL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -160.69M vs. HUT (-287.41M). KEEL has more cash in the bank: 357M vs. HUT (160M). HUT has less debt than KEEL: HUT (423M) vs KEEL (591M). HUT has higher revenues than KEEL: HUT (284M) vs KEEL (219M).
HUTKEELHUT / KEEL
Capitalization13.4B3.37B398%
EBITDA-287.41M-160.69M179%
Gain YTD158.729137.872115%
P/E Ratio28.26N/A-
Revenue284M219M130%
Total Cash160M357M45%
Total Debt423M591M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT vs KEEL: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
KEEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8436
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3993
SMR RATING
1..100
9899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3434
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a41

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KEEL's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUT (93). This means that KEEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KEEL (93). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than KEEL’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as KEEL (99). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to KEEL’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as KEEL (34). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to KEEL’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KEEL (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew significantly faster than KEEL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUTKEEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KEEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWH7.980.24
+3.10%
Camping World Holdings
SEV2.250.06
+2.74%
Aptera Motors Corp
DNOW14.030.37
+2.71%
DNOW
DOC20.690.19
+0.93%
Healthpeak Properties
RPGL2.32-0.13
-5.31%
Republic Power Group Limited

KEEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEEL has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KEEL jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KEEL
1D Price
Change %
KEEL100%
+1.27%
CLSK - KEEL
76%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
HIVE - KEEL
76%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
HUT - KEEL
72%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
RIOT - KEEL
72%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
MARA - KEEL
71%
Closely correlated
+3.45%
More