ICF
Price
$68.73Alerts
Change
+$1.01 (+1.49%)
Updated
Nov 9 closing price
Net Assets
2.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REM
Price
$17.40Alerts
Change
+$0.20 (+1.16%)
Updated
Nov 9 closing price
Net Assets
442.41M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICF vs REM

ICF vs REM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Nov 05, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) vs. iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM)

Key Takeaways

  • ICF tracks a portfolio of roughly 30 large, liquid equity REITs, while REM concentrates on about 34 mortgage REITs that invest in mortgage-backed securities and real estate loans.
  • Cost structure differs materially: ICF charges a 0.32% expense ratio versus 0.48% for REM.
  • Risk profiles diverge sharply — ICF carries property-level equity risk across diversified sectors, while REM is highly sensitive to interest rates, credit spreads, and leverage.
  • REM is far more concentrated, with its top two holdings, NLY and AGNC, together representing roughly 38% of assets.
  • Dividend profiles differ: REM offers elevated yields, but ICF provides more consistent, diversified income and broader sector exposure.
  • Tickeron AI Verdict: ICF is the favored ticker of the two, based on cost efficiency, diversification, and more durable structural positioning.

Introduction

Real estate investing comes in many forms, and few contrasts are as instructive as the one between ICF and REM. Both funds live under the broad real estate umbrella, yet they represent fundamentally different risk-and-return propositions. ICF owns equity in physical properties and the operating companies that manage them, while REM lends against property through mortgage securities. For investors weighing income, volatility, and interest-rate sensitivity, this ETF comparison illuminates how two funds in the same sector can behave almost like opposite strategies. As rate expectations and credit conditions shift, understanding the structural differences between equity REITs and mortgage REITs has rarely been more relevant.

iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) Overview

ICF is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, a benchmark of relatively large, liquid U.S. real estate investment trusts (REITs — companies that own and operate income-producing real estate). Launched in 2001, the fund holds roughly 30 securities and carries a net expense ratio of 0.32%.

Top holdings include data-center and tower operators EQIX, AMT, and DLR; industrial and diversified landlords PLD and O; healthcare specialist WELL; retail operator SPG; and storage leader PSA. Sector exposure spans telecom towers, data centers, retail, multi-family and single-family residential, healthcare, industrial, and self-storage — a diversified mix that skews toward secular growth themes such as cloud computing and connectivity.

iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) Overview

REM is a passively managed fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Mortgage Capped Index, composed of U.S. mortgage REITs (mREITs) that hold residential and commercial mortgages and mortgage-backed securities rather than physical property. Launched in 2007, it holds about 34 securities and charges a 0.48% expense ratio.

The portfolio is heavily concentrated at the top. NLY and AGNC account for roughly 22% and 15–16% of assets respectively, followed by STWD, RITM, DX, EFC, and ARR. Because mREITs fund their portfolios with borrowed capital, REM amplifies interest-rate and credit-market sensitivity, producing high headline yields alongside elevated volatility.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate under the shadow of monetary policy. Mortgage REITs such as those in REM are directly exposed to the spread between short-term borrowing costs and long-term mortgage yields; an inverted or narrow yield curve compresses their earnings, while rate cuts can widen margins. Equity REITs in ICF, by contrast, are influenced by financing costs, occupancy, and rent growth, with data-center, tower, and healthcare segments benefiting from long-duration secular demand.

Capital flows within real estate have favored structural growth niches — artificial intelligence-driven data demand, 5G infrastructure, and senior housing demographics — all of which feature prominently in ICF. Credit-sensitive mREITs face additional headwinds from commercial real estate loan stress and refinancing risk, making REM more vulnerable to macro turbulence.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Across recent market cycles, ICF has exhibited steadier relative positioning, supported by diversified sector exposure and a lower, 0.32% fee drag. Its growth-oriented holdings have allowed it to capture upside during technology-infrastructure rallies while remaining more defensive than a purely credit-driven vehicle.

REM has historically delivered higher income but with considerably greater volatility, as its fund performance tracks interest-rate expectations and credit spreads more than property fundamentals. When rate expectations are volatile, mortgage REITs can experience sharp repricing in both directions. Investors seeking total-return consistency and broader sector exposure have generally favored equity REIT structures, while income-oriented traders accepting leverage and rate risk have gravitated toward REM.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of securities using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending names, breakout candidates, and market opportunities far more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to surface actionable ideas tailored to your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor ICF over REM. The decision rests on ICF's lower expense ratio, meaningfully broader diversification across property sectors, reduced concentration risk, and less direct sensitivity to interest-rate and credit shocks. While REM offers a higher yield, its reliance on leverage and its outsized weight in a handful of mortgage REITs introduce volatility that weighs against its risk-adjusted appeal. In an environment where rate policy remains a key swing factor, the AI's probabilistic preference tilts toward the more balanced, lower-cost equity REIT exposure of ICF.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ICF vs. REM commentary
Nov 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICF is a Buy and REM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for ICF with price predictions
Nov 09, 2026

ICF in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026

ICF moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 50 of 57 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ICF as a result. In 72 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ICF just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where ICF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.

The 10-day moving average for ICF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

Following a +3.29% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ICF advanced for three days, in 266 of 318 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 227 of 295 cases where ICF Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 77%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for ICF moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 27 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 24 of the 27 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 89%.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

The 50-day moving average for ICF moved below the 200-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ICF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

ICF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for REM with price predictions
Nov 09, 2026

REM's RSI Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for REM moved out of oversold territory on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 27 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 26 of the 27 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for REM just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where REM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.

Following a +2.58% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where REM advanced for three days, in 254 of 311 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

REM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 56 of 70 cases where REM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on REM as a result. In 69 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where REM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

The Aroon Indicator for REM entered a downward trend on October 28, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICFREM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICF has been closely correlated with EXR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICF jumps, then EXR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICF
1D Price
Change %
ICF100%
+1.49%
EXR - ICF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
KIM - ICF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
PSA - ICF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
O - ICF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
KRC - ICF
72%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
More

REM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REM has been loosely correlated with HASI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if REM jumps, then HASI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REM
1D Price
Change %
REM100%
+1.16%
HASI - REM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
AFCG - REM
-4%
Poorly correlated
+8.36%
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBFR25.390.58
+2.33%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR)
FXH139.472.89
+2.12%
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH)
MDST27.460.51
+1.89%
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST)
SOCL41.990.64
+1.54%
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL)
TRUO27.760.18
+0.64%
VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO)