ICLN
Price
$21.10
Change
+$0.62 (+3.03%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
3.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBD
Price
$20.30
Change
+$0.21 (+1.05%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
214.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICLN vs PBD

ICLN vs PBD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs. Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) both provide passive exposure to global clean energy themes but differ in index methodology, cost structure, and portfolio concentration.
  • ICLN tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index with approximately 106 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.39%, offering broader diversification compared to PBD.
  • PBD follows the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index with around 110-124 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.75%, emphasizing innovative clean energy technologies.
  • Both ETFs maintain similar thematic focus on renewables such as solar, wind, and fuel cell technologies, yet ICLN exhibits greater liquidity and scale due to its larger asset base.
  • Sector allocations for both center on industrials and technology, with ICLN showing higher concentration in top holdings like fuel cell and solar companies.
  • Structural differences position ICLN as a more cost-efficient vehicle for broad clean energy exposure, while PBD offers a distinct innovation-driven tilt at a premium cost.

Introduction

Investors seeking clean energy exposure often evaluate thematic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that target renewable technologies and related infrastructure. The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) represent two established options in this space. They do not compete directly as identical products but serve as alternatives within the clean energy sector, delivering differentiated strategies that align with similar long-term goals of participating in the global transition to sustainable energy sources. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions to inform relative positioning decisions.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Overview

The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index. The fund holds approximately 106 securities, providing diversified exposure across global clean energy companies. Top holdings typically include Bloom Energy Corp, First Solar Inc., and other leaders in solar and fuel cell technologies, with the top 10 positions accounting for a significant portion of assets. Sector allocations emphasize industrials and technology, reflecting the clean energy supply chain. The expense ratio stands at 0.39%, and the fund employs a full replication strategy with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. As an open-end structure listed on NASDAQ, it offers strong liquidity characteristics suitable for institutional and retail investors alike.

Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) Overview

The Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. It maintains a portfolio of approximately 110-124 holdings, with an emphasis on companies advancing cleaner energy technologies, conservation, and efficiency innovations. Holdings are more broadly distributed, with top positions such as ITM Power PLC and Ballard Power Systems Inc. representing smaller individual weights. Sector exposure centers on industrials and information technology, consistent with the innovation theme. The expense ratio is 0.75%, reflecting the specialized index methodology. The fund uses a sampling approach for replication and rebalances as needed to align with the underlying index, operating as an open-end ETF on NYSE Arca with adequate liquidity for its asset scale.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The clean energy sector encompasses companies involved in solar, wind, hydrogen, and other renewable technologies, driven by global decarbonization efforts, policy support, and technological advancements. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, supply chain dynamics, and government incentives continue to influence capital allocation across renewables. Regulatory developments, including renewable portfolio standards and emissions targets, provide structural tailwinds, while commodity price fluctuations and grid integration challenges introduce sector-specific risks. Both ETFs operate within this evolving landscape, where long-term demand for sustainable energy solutions remains a key driver independent of short-term market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to sector rotation favoring renewables amid shifting energy policies and interest rate expectations. ICLN has demonstrated relatively tighter tracking to its broad global clean energy benchmark, benefiting from its scale and lower costs during periods of steady sector momentum. PBD has shown greater volatility tied to its innovation focus, with performance influenced by smaller-cap technology names in the clean energy space. Relative positioning favors ICLN for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and broader diversification, while PBD appeals to those seeking exposure to emerging clean energy innovations, though at higher ongoing expenses. Differences in volatility profiles stem primarily from holding concentration and geographic or market-cap tilts rather than isolated events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings for diversification, and larger scale supporting liquidity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) for most investors seeking clean energy exposure. The cost efficiency and established index methodology provide a more balanced risk profile relative to the higher-fee, innovation-tilted approach of the Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD), though individual suitability depends on specific portfolio objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ICLN vs. PBD commentary
Jun 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICLN is a Hold and PBD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICLN has more net assets: 3.07B vs. PBD (214M). ICLN has a higher annual dividend yield than PBD: ICLN (28.769) vs PBD (26.366). ICLN was incepted earlier than PBD: ICLN (18 years) vs PBD (19 years). ICLN (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than PBD (0.75). PBD has a higher turnover ICLN (25.00) vs ICLN (25.00).
ICLNPBDICLN / PBD
Gain YTD28.76926.366109%
Net Assets3.07B214M1,433%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.7552%
Turnover25.0049.0051%
Yield1.141.6370%
Fund Existence18 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICLNPBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEEIX105.923.94
+3.86%
Needham Growth Institutional
FSCTX31.600.57
+1.84%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap M
FLCSX68.070.66
+0.98%
Fidelity Large Cap Stock
MLCPX9.49N/A
N/A
MainGate MLP C
GTAPX13.37-0.09
-0.67%
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf

ICLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICLN
1D Price
Change %
ICLN100%
+3.03%
NXT - ICLN
72%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
BE - ICLN
69%
Closely correlated
+15.41%
FCEL - ICLN
68%
Closely correlated
+19.96%
FSLR - ICLN
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
SEDG - ICLN
58%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
More

PBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBD has been loosely correlated with BLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBD jumps, then BLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBD
1D Price
Change %
PBD100%
+1.06%
BLDP - PBD
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.05%
MP - PBD
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
EVGO - PBD
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
CHPT - PBD
58%
Loosely correlated
+8.06%
ACHR - PBD
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.92%
More