This stock comparison examines IESC and MYRG, two leaders in electrical infrastructure and construction services within the industrials sector. Both companies have surged amid rising demand for data centers, renewable energy projects, and grid modernization. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing relative performance in engineering and construction will find value in analyzing their recent earnings strength, valuation metrics, and sector tailwinds. This review highlights key contrasts in growth drivers, recent market positioning, and AI-driven insights for informed decision-making in today's volatile environment.
IESC, or IES Holdings, Inc., designs, installs, and maintains integrated electrical and technology systems for data centers, commercial facilities, residential housing, and industrial sites across the U.S. In recent market activity, shares have exhibited robust momentum, reaching new 52-week highs near $677 amid broader industrials strength. Fiscal Q2 2026 results showed revenue of $974 million and adjusted EPS of $5.44, surpassing expectations, fueled by higher-margin projects and operational efficiencies. Year-to-date returns exceed 65%, with one-year gains over 170%, outpacing the S&P 500. Sentiment has shifted positively due to consistent earnings beats and exposure to high-growth areas like data centers, though elevated beta (1.81) signals volatility tied to economic cycles.
MYRG, or MYR Group Inc., specializes in electrical construction through its Transmission & Distribution (T&D) and Commercial & Industrial (C&I) segments, serving utilities, renewables, and infrastructure projects in the U.S. and Canada. Recent weeks have seen explosive price action, with shares climbing over 50% in the past month following record Q1 2026 results: revenue up 20% to $1 billion, gross margins expanding to 13.4%, and EPS of $2.99, well above consensus. YTD performance tops 114%, with a three-year return of ~245%, driven by a $2.84 billion backlog and demand for EV charging, clean energy, and grid upgrades. Positive sentiment stems from margin improvements and low leverage (funded debt-to-EBITDA at 0.04x), though project inefficiencies pose minor risks.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots, optimized for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto in high-growth sectors. These bots employ advanced AI to scan volatility, identify trends, and execute strategies like take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL), trend following, and multi-agent models on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +169%, win rates reaching 88%, and profit factors as high as 11.7, with bots trading 1-18 tickers and average durations of 1-48 days. One bot includes MYRG among its industrials picks (+40% return, 55% win rate). Explore these for diverse styles and real-time adaptability—visit Trending AI Robots to see which align with current conditions.
Both firms share sector exposure to electrical infrastructure but diverge in focus: IESC emphasizes integrated systems for data centers and tech installs, while MYRG prioritizes T&D utility work and C&I projects like substations and EV infrastructure. Growth drivers align on electrification and renewables, yet MYRG's $2.84B backlog signals stronger visibility versus IESC's project-based momentum. Recent momentum tilts to MYRG (monthly +50% vs. IESC +33%), but IESC leads long-term (10-year CAGR ~48% vs. 34%). Risk profiles show IESC higher beta (1.81 vs. 1.30), with greater sensitivity to industrials cycles; MYRG benefits from utility stability. Valuations favor IESC at 33x P/E versus MYRG's 51x, amid comparable revenue growth (~17%). Sentiment is bullish for both, though MYRG has more analyst coverage.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward IESC for its superior trend consistency, lower relative valuation, and stronger long-term compounding in the electrical systems niche. Factors like recent earnings beats, data center catalysts, and a more attractive P/E position it favorably against MYRG's hotter short-term momentum but pricier multiple. Probabilistic edge to IESC (~60% confidence) in prevailing market conditions, though MYRG suits aggressive traders eyeing backlog-driven upside.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMYRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IESC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MYRG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +3.69% price change this week, while MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.23%.
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| IESC | MYRG | IESC / MYRG | |
| Capitalization | 13.7B | 7.09B | 193% |
| EBITDA | 537M | 266M | 202% |
| Gain YTD | 76.294 | 108.362 | 70% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.58 | 50.20 | 73% |
| Revenue | 3.63B | 3.83B | 95% |
| Total Cash | 263M | 163M | 161% |
| Total Debt | 107M | 61.5M | 174% |
IESC | MYRG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IESC's Valuation (82) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (84). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (6). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (42). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as IESC (36). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MYRG (83). This means that IESC’s stock grew significantly faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| IESC | MYRG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IYE | 61.02 | 0.39 | +0.64% |
| iShares US Energy ETF | |||
| RLTY | 15.78 | 0.04 | +0.25% |
| Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund | |||
| NITE | 37.78 | N/A | N/A |
| The Nightview ETF | |||
| EFAS | 22.00 | -0.08 | -0.34% |
| Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | |||
| EFFI | 24.94 | -0.24 | -0.94% |
| Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYRG has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MYRG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYRG | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| PWR - MYRG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| MTZ - MYRG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| EME - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| STRL - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| FIX - MYRG | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||