IFCZF
Price
$188.25
Change
-$3.66 (-1.91%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
33.8B
UFCS
Price
$30.77
Change
+$0.24 (+0.79%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
778.27M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFCZF vs UFCS

Header iconIFCZF vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts IFCZF vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Intact Financial
Price$188.25
Change-$3.66 (-1.91%)
Volume$90
Capitalization33.8B
United Fire Group
Price$30.77
Change+$0.24 (+0.79%)
Volume$110
Capitalization778.27M
IFCZF vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFCZF vs. UFCS commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a Hold and UFCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IFCZF: $188.25 vs. UFCS: $30.53)
Brand notoriety: IFCZF and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFCZF: 1% vs. UFCS: 61%
Market capitalization -- IFCZF: $33.8B vs. UFCS: $778.27M
IFCZF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $33.8B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $778.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $142.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than IFCZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -6.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.01% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($33.8B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($778M). IFCZF has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: IFCZF (20.00) vs UFCS (8.70). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 9.098 vs. IFCZF (3.332). IFCZF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. UFCS (1.19B). UFCS has less debt than IFCZF: UFCS (117M) vs IFCZF (5.43B). IFCZF has higher revenues than UFCS: IFCZF (24.7B) vs UFCS (1.32B).
IFCZFUFCSIFCZF / UFCS
Capitalization33.8B778M4,344%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.3329.09837%
P/E Ratio20.008.70230%
Revenue24.7B1.32B1,868%
Total Cash19.5B1.19B1,643%
Total Debt5.43B117M4,638%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5367
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2466
SMR RATING
1..100
9569
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6188
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (44) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (60) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (66) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (95) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (62) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as UFCS (88) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFCZFUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERA26.960.82
+3.14%
Vera Therapeutics
SPCB13.180.26
+2.01%
SuperCom Ltd
MSBIP24.510.01
+0.04%
Midland States Bancorp
SRAD29.32-0.22
-0.74%
Sportradar Group AG
GDEV20.44-1.58
-7.18%
GDEV Inc

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
-1.91%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More