IFCZF
Price
$226.59
Change
-$3.13 (-1.36%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
25.76B
UFCS
Price
$27.67
Change
-$0.70 (-2.47%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
550.29M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IFCZF vs UFCS

Header iconIFCZF vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts IFCZF vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Intact Financial
Price$226.59
Change-$3.13 (-1.36%)
Volume$43.76K
Capitalization25.76B
United Fire Group
Price$27.67
Change-$0.70 (-2.47%)
Volume$142.57K
Capitalization550.29M
IFCZF vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IFCZF vs. UFCS commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (IFCZF: $226.59 vs. UFCS: $27.65)
Brand notoriety: IFCZF and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IFCZF: 2% vs. UFCS: 132%
Market capitalization -- IFCZF: $25.76B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
IFCZF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $25.76B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the long-term than UFCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFCZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.46% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($25.8B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). UFCS has higher P/E ratio than IFCZF: UFCS (41.53) vs IFCZF (15.20). IFCZF YTD gains are higher at: 24.377 vs. UFCS (-1.724). IFCZF has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. UFCS (102M). UFCS has less debt than IFCZF: UFCS (50M) vs IFCZF (5.43B). IFCZF has higher revenues than UFCS: IFCZF (21.2B) vs UFCS (1.1B).
IFCZFUFCSIFCZF / UFCS
Capitalization25.8B550M4,691%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.377-1.724-1,414%
P/E Ratio15.2041.5337%
Revenue21.2B1.1B1,931%
Total Cash15.8B102M15,490%
Total Debt5.43B50M10,860%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IFCZF vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
IFCZF
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2621
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
495
SMR RATING
1..100
9679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6572
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (42) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFCZF (76) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UFCS (95) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew significantly faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (79) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (96) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as UFCS (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as UFCS (72) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFCZFUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OLVTX20.580.07
+0.34%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R3
MSQLX11.45N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq L
NELCX52.54N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Long/Short C
GGGPX41.97N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity P
UIVRX12.69N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R6

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
-1.36%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.41%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-2.56%
SAFT - UFCS
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
CINF - UFCS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
L - UFCS
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
AFG - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
THG - UFCS
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
More