IFCZF vs UFCS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IFCZF is a Hold and UFCS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IFCZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UFCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
UFCS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- UFCS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
UFCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.83% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| IFCZF | UFCS | IFCZF / UFCS | |
| Capitalization | 25.8B | 550M | 4,691% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.617 | 2.069 | 1,238% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.20 | 41.53 | 37% |
| Revenue | 21.2B | 1.1B | 1,931% |
| Total Cash | 15.8B | 102M | 15,490% |
| Total Debt | 5.43B | 50M | 10,860% |
IFCZF | UFCS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UFCS's Valuation (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (58) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.
IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UFCS (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew significantly faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's SMR Rating (84) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as IFCZF (96) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.
IFCZF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as UFCS (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFCZF (87) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.
| UFCS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 46% |
IFCZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFCZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFCZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PLMR - IFCZF | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| UFCS - IFCZF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.76% | ||
| FRFHF - IFCZF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| MCY - IFCZF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
| BNT - IFCZF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||
UFCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then THG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UFCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFCS | 100% | -2.76% | ||
| THG - UFCS | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.82% | ||
| CINF - UFCS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| AFG - UFCS | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.03% | ||
| L - UFCS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| RLI - UFCS | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
More | ||||