Advertisement
INSE vs LVS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INSE is a Hold and LVS is a StrongBuy.
| INSE | LVS | INSE / LVS | |
| Capitalization | 134M | 27.7B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 102M | 4.62B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -45.513 | -33.046 | 138% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.55 | 16.60 | 21% |
| Revenue | 281M | 13.7B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 22M | 3.38B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 343M | 15.3B | 2% |
INSE | LVS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSE's Valuation (40) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as LVS (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as INSE (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to INSE’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (12) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for INSE (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than INSE’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as INSE (82) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to INSE’s over the last 12 months.
INSE's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVS (86) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that INSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVS’s over the last 12 months.
| INSE | LVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 74% | 10 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INSE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while LVS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- INSE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INSE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
INSE (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -8.77% price change this week, while LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
INSE is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
LVS is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+0.29% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.33% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
Advertisement
INSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSE has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INSE jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSE | 100% | -3.23% | ||
| CZR - INSE | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| VAC - INSE | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| BYD - INSE | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| PENN - INSE | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| MGM - INSE | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
LVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been loosely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| WYNN - LVS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| BRSL - LVS | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| INSE - LVS | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.23% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||