INTR
Price
$7.11
Change
+$0.14 (+2.01%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.51B
88 days until earnings call
SANM
Price
$84.41
Change
+$2.30 (+2.80%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.39B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

INTR vs SANM

Header iconINTR vs SANM Comparison
Open Charts INTR vs SANMBanner chart's image
Inter & Co
Price$7.11
Change+$0.14 (+2.01%)
Volume$39.22K
Capitalization2.51B
Sanmina
Price$84.41
Change+$2.30 (+2.80%)
Volume$17.66K
Capitalization4.39B
INTR vs SANM Comparison Chart
Loading...
INTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
INTR vs. SANM commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INTR is a Buy and SANM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (INTR: $6.97 vs. SANM: $82.11)
Brand notoriety: INTR and SANM are both not notable
INTR represents the Regional Banks, while SANM is part of the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: INTR: 89% vs. SANM: 152%
Market capitalization -- INTR: $2.51B vs. SANM: $4.39B
INTR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.51B. SANM’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $103.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

INTR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • INTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SANM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANM is a better buy in the long-term than INTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • INTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SANM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SANM is a better buy in the short-term than INTR.

Price Growth

INTR (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTR is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

SANM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.94% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Electronic Components (+0.36% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SANM($4.39B) has a higher market cap than INTR($2.51B). INTR has higher P/E ratio than SANM: INTR (38.41) vs SANM (19.01). INTR YTD gains are higher at: 67.664 vs. SANM (8.511). SANM has less debt than INTR: SANM (309M) vs INTR (7.68B). SANM has higher revenues than INTR: SANM (7.85B) vs INTR (4.44B).
INTRSANMINTR / SANM
Capitalization2.51B4.39B57%
EBITDAN/A480M-
Gain YTD67.6648.511795%
P/E Ratio38.4119.01202%
Revenue4.44B7.85B57%
Total CashN/A647M-
Total Debt7.68B309M2,485%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SANM: Fundamental Ratings
SANM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTRSANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
INTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZSC22.64N/A
N/A
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy
GBF101.99-0.65
-0.64%
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF
XRMI17.61-0.12
-0.65%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF
IWL143.91-2.14
-1.47%
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
XRT74.20-2.35
-3.07%
SPDR® S&P Retail ETF

INTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTR has been loosely correlated with BSBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTR jumps, then BSBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTR
1D Price
Change %
INTR100%
-0.43%
BSBR - INTR
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
BBD - INTR
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
ITUB - INTR
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
NU - INTR
50%
Loosely correlated
-6.11%
BSAC - INTR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

SANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANM
1D Price
Change %
SANM100%
-0.26%
FLEX - SANM
76%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
BHE - SANM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
KN - SANM
75%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
CTS - SANM
75%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
JBL - SANM
73%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
More