IONQ
Price
$42.74
Change
-$0.56 (-1.29%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
12.69B
77 days until earnings call
UMAC
Price
$9.60
Change
-$0.57 (-5.60%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
292.2M
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IONQ vs UMAC

Header iconIONQ vs UMAC Comparison
Open Charts IONQ vs UMACBanner chart's image
IonQ
Price$42.74
Change-$0.56 (-1.29%)
Volume$11.54M
Capitalization12.69B
Unusual Machines
Price$9.60
Change-$0.57 (-5.60%)
Volume$3.13M
Capitalization292.2M
IONQ vs UMAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IONQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IONQ vs. UMAC commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IONQ is a Buy and UMAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (IONQ: $42.74 vs. UMAC: $9.60)
Brand notoriety: IONQ and UMAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IONQ: 61% vs. UMAC: 79%
Market capitalization -- IONQ: $12.69B vs. UMAC: $292.2M
IONQ [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $12.69B. UMAC’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $292.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $171.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $11.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IONQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IONQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UMAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMAC is a better buy in the long-term than IONQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IONQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IONQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the short-term than UMAC.

Price Growth

IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +7.44% price change this week, while UMAC (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -13.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

IONQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

UMAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+2.03% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IONQ($12.7B) has a higher market cap than UMAC($292M). IONQ YTD gains are higher at: 2.322 vs. UMAC (-42.925). UMAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -39.34M vs. IONQ (-339.34M). IONQ has more cash in the bank: 543M vs. UMAC (38.9M). UMAC has less debt than IONQ: UMAC (297K) vs IONQ (19.3M). IONQ has higher revenues than UMAC: IONQ (52.4M) vs UMAC (7.7M).
IONQUMACIONQ / UMAC
Capitalization12.7B292M4,349%
EBITDA-339.34M-39.34M863%
Gain YTD2.322-42.925-5%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue52.4M7.7M680%
Total Cash543M38.9M1,396%
Total Debt19.3M297K6,498%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IONQUMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IONQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTEC39.56N/A
N/A
Global X PropTech ETF
XBAP37.48-0.03
-0.09%
Innovator US Eq Acltd 9 Bfr ETFTM April
THY22.56-0.02
-0.10%
Toews Agility Dynamic Tactical Inc ETF
QTPI25.47-0.07
-0.29%
North Square Rcim Tax-Advantaged Preferred And Income Securities ETF
HFXI30.43-0.10
-0.33%
NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF

IONQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IONQ
1D Price
Change %
IONQ100%
-1.29%
RGTI - IONQ
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
QBTS - IONQ
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
QUBT - IONQ
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
UMAC - IONQ
38%
Loosely correlated
-5.60%
CAN - IONQ
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
More

UMAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMAC has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMAC jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMAC
1D Price
Change %
UMAC100%
-5.60%
RGTI - UMAC
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
QBTS - UMAC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
IONQ - UMAC
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
QUBT - UMAC
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
QMCO - UMAC
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
More