QUBT
Price
$7.43
Change
-$0.43 (-5.47%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMAC
Price
$19.36
Change
-$2.16 (-10.04%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
925.29M
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QUBT vs UMAC

QUBT vs UMAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QUBT vs. UMAC commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUBT is a StrongBuy and UMAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (QUBT: $7.43 vs. UMAC: $19.36)
Brand notoriety: QUBT and UMAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QUBT: 30% vs. UMAC: 45%
Market capitalization -- QUBT: $1.68B vs. UMAC: $925.29M
QUBT [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $1.68B. UMAC’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $925.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $282.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $25.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QUBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UMAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMAC is a better buy in the long-term than QUBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QUBT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QUBT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UMAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMAC is a better buy in the short-term than QUBT.

Price Growth

QUBT (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -4.74% price change this week, while UMAC (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +14.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

QUBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

UMAC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+0.41% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUBT($1.68B) has a higher market cap than UMAC($925M). UMAC YTD gains are higher at: 51.962 vs. QUBT (-27.583). UMAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.49M vs. QUBT (-33.34M). QUBT has more cash in the bank: 986M vs. UMAC (284M). UMAC has less debt than QUBT: UMAC (3.33M) vs QUBT (3.68M). UMAC has higher revenues than QUBT: UMAC (17.3M) vs QUBT (4.33M).
QUBTUMACQUBT / UMAC
Capitalization1.68B925M181%
EBITDA-33.34M-5.49M607%
Gain YTD-27.58351.962-53%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4.33M17.3M25%
Total Cash986M284M347%
Total Debt3.68M3.33M111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QUBT: Fundamental Ratings
QUBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QUBTUMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QUBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGISX40.500.66
+1.66%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs I
IINCX24.68N/A
N/A
Nomura International Core Equity R6
VWENX79.78-0.11
-0.14%
Vanguard Wellington Admiral
SGTRX117.12-2.20
-1.84%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech R
ADNAX19.44-0.54
-2.70%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov A

QUBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBT
1D Price
Change %
QUBT100%
-5.47%
RGTI - QUBT
83%
Closely correlated
-4.71%
QBTS - QUBT
81%
Closely correlated
-5.20%
IONQ - QUBT
77%
Closely correlated
-3.61%
QMCO - QUBT
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.90%
DPRO - QUBT
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
More

UMAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMAC has been loosely correlated with QUBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMAC jumps, then QUBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMAC
1D Price
Change %
UMAC100%
-10.04%
QUBT - UMAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-5.47%
RGTI - UMAC
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.71%
QBTS - UMAC
43%
Loosely correlated
-5.20%
QMCO - UMAC
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.90%
IONQ - UMAC
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
More