QBTS
Price
$26.26
Change
+$2.89 (+12.37%)
Updated
Jun 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.73B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMAC
Price
$24.73
Change
+$0.30 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jun 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBTS vs UMAC

Header iconQBTS vs UMAC Comparison
Open Charts QBTS vs UMACBanner chart's image
QBTS vs UMAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBTS vs. UMAC commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTS is a Hold and UMAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2026
Stock price -- (QBTS: $26.26 vs. UMAC: $24.73)
Brand notoriety: QBTS and UMAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBTS: 114% vs. UMAC: 82%
Market capitalization -- QBTS: $9.73B vs. UMAC: $1.18B
QBTS [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $9.73B. UMAC’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $265.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $28.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UMAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMAC is a better buy in the long-term than QBTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UMAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMAC is a better buy in the short-term than QBTS.

Price Growth

QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while UMAC (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -4.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

UMAC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+4.48% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBTS($9.73B) has a higher market cap than UMAC($1.18B). UMAC YTD gains are higher at: 94.113 vs. QBTS (0.421). UMAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.49M vs. QBTS (-386.5M). QBTS has more cash in the bank: 588M vs. UMAC (284M). UMAC has less debt than QBTS: UMAC (3.33M) vs QBTS (46.8M). UMAC has higher revenues than QBTS: UMAC (17.3M) vs QBTS (12.4M).
QBTSUMACQBTS / UMAC
Capitalization9.73B1.18B823%
EBITDA-386.5M-5.49M7,035%
Gain YTD0.42194.1130%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue12.4M17.3M72%
Total Cash588M284M207%
Total Debt46.8M3.33M1,406%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBTSUMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMBJ61.503.70
+6.40%
Embraer SA
AMSC41.071.05
+2.62%
American Superconductor Corp
DCGO0.58N/A
-0.02%
DocGo
NEWT13.73-0.28
-1.96%
NewtekOne
FVNNU11.21-0.29
-2.52%
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp.

UMAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMAC has been loosely correlated with UAVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMAC jumps, then UAVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMAC
1D Price
Change %
UMAC100%
+1.23%
UAVS - UMAC
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
QUBT - UMAC
46%
Loosely correlated
+11.78%
RGTI - UMAC
44%
Loosely correlated
+8.20%
QBTS - UMAC
43%
Loosely correlated
+12.37%
IONQ - UMAC
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.76%
More