Advertisement
QBTS vs UMAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTS is a Hold and UMAC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UMAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UMAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -15.61% price change this week, while UMAC (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -20.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -10.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
UMAC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-10.10% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| QBTS | UMAC | QBTS / UMAC | |
| Capitalization | 8.61B | 1.09B | 789% |
| EBITDA | -386.5M | -5.49M | 7,035% |
| Gain YTD | -11.090 | 79.356 | -14% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 12.4M | 17.3M | 72% |
| Total Cash | 588M | 284M | 207% |
| Total Debt | 46.8M | 3.33M | 1,406% |
| QBTS | UMAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
QBTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with IONQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then IONQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 78% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| QMCO - QBTS | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| CAN - QBTS | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
More | ||||
UMAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMAC has been loosely correlated with QUBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMAC jumps, then QUBT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMAC | 100% | -4.39% | ||
| QUBT - UMAC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| UAVS - UMAC | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| RGTI - UMAC | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| QBTS - UMAC | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| IONQ - UMAC | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||