Ad is loading...
IRCKF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
LW
Price
$75.47
Change
-$4.94 (-6.14%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
46 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IRCKF vs LW

Header iconIRCKF vs LW Comparison
Open Charts IRCKF vs LWBanner chart's image
Inter-Rock Minerals
Price$0.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23K
CapitalizationN/A
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$75.47
Change-$4.94 (-6.14%)
Volume$4.4M
CapitalizationN/A
IRCKF vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRCKF vs. LW commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRCKF is a Hold and LW is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (IRCKF: $0.58 vs. LW: $75.47)
Brand notoriety: IRCKF and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRCKF: 228% vs. LW: 175%
Market capitalization -- IRCKF: $9.81M vs. LW: $15.38B
IRCKF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $9.81M. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRCKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IRCKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than IRCKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

IRCKF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -7.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than IRCKF($9.82M). LW has higher P/E ratio than IRCKF: LW (13.62) vs IRCKF (11.22). IRCKF YTD gains are higher at: 15.400 vs. LW (-28.865). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. IRCKF (3.48M). IRCKF has less debt than LW: IRCKF (1.28M) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than IRCKF: LW (6.35B) vs IRCKF (72.2M).
IRCKFLWIRCKF / LW
Capitalization9.82M15.4B0%
EBITDA3.48M1.34B0%
Gain YTD15.400-28.865-53%
P/E Ratio11.2213.6282%
Revenue72.2M6.35B1%
Total Cash4.93MN/A-
Total Debt1.28M3.63B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRCKF vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
IRCKF
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5087
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1986
SMR RATING
1..100
4826
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5537
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (76) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (86) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IRCKF’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (48) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCKF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IRCKF’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (55) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RREAX29.340.06
+0.20%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs A
PESAX21.09-0.12
-0.57%
Principal Large Cap Value III R1
FHERX14.13-0.11
-0.77%
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq R6
JCAVX10.32-0.12
-1.15%
JHFunds2 Capital Appreciation Value NAV
AIVSX61.42-0.84
-1.35%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer A

IRCKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRCKF and LW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRCKF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRCKF
1D Price
Change %
IRCKF100%
N/A
LW - IRCKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
KRYAF - IRCKF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAY - IRCKF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.32%
JBSAY - IRCKF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
JDEPF - IRCKF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-6.14%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
POST - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
More