IRCKF
Price
$0.59
Change
+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
12.71M
LW
Price
$54.15
Change
-$0.68 (-1.24%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
7.55B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRCKF vs LW

Header iconIRCKF vs LW Comparison
Open Charts IRCKF vs LWBanner chart's image
Inter-Rock Minerals
Price$0.59
Change+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Volume$51K
Capitalization12.71M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$54.15
Change-$0.68 (-1.24%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization7.55B
IRCKF vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IRCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRCKF vs. LW commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRCKF is a Buy and LW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (IRCKF: $0.59 vs. LW: $54.15)
Brand notoriety: IRCKF and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRCKF: 820% vs. LW: 47%
Market capitalization -- IRCKF: $12.71M vs. LW: $7.55B
IRCKF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $12.71M. LW’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRCKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IRCKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IRCKF and LW are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRCKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRCKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IRCKF is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

IRCKF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +1.72% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +5.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1016.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($7.55B) has a higher market cap than IRCKF($12.7M). LW has higher P/E ratio than IRCKF: LW (21.66) vs IRCKF (11.80). IRCKF YTD gains are higher at: 1.724 vs. LW (-17.365). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.07B vs. IRCKF (3.7M). LW has more cash in the bank: 70.7M vs. IRCKF (6.97M). IRCKF has less debt than LW: IRCKF (3.04M) vs LW (4.16B). LW has higher revenues than IRCKF: LW (6.45B) vs IRCKF (100M).
IRCKFLWIRCKF / LW
Capitalization12.7M7.55B0%
EBITDA3.7M1.07B0%
Gain YTD1.724-17.365-10%
P/E Ratio11.8021.6654%
Revenue100M6.45B2%
Total Cash6.97M70.7M10%
Total Debt3.04M4.16B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRCKF vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
IRCKF
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5087
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
5545
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (35) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IRCKF (75) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IRCKF’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (45) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (55) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCKF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IRCKF’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (18) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRCKFLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELVN20.220.45
+2.28%
Enliven Therapeutics
DE488.809.96
+2.08%
Deere & Company
SGHC11.570.15
+1.31%
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
SWIN4.520.03
+0.67%
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share
QRHC1.67-0.01
-0.60%
Quest Resource Holding Corp

IRCKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRCKF and LW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRCKF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRCKF
1D Price
Change %
IRCKF100%
+1.72%
LW - IRCKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
KRYAF - IRCKF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAY - IRCKF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
JBS - IRCKF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
JDEPF - IRCKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-1.24%
KHC - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
FLO - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.37%
HRL - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
THS - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.32%
More