Advertisement
IRCKF vs LW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRCKF is a Hold and LW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IRCKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IRCKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
IRCKF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -6.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-0.84% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| IRCKF | LW | IRCKF / LW | |
| Capitalization | 15.6M | 7.83B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 4.19M | 1.02B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 1.724 | -13.755 | -13% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.83 | 27.01 | 36% |
| Revenue | 103M | 6.46B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 6.79M | 98.6M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 2.8M | 3.99B | 0% |
IRCKF | LW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LW's Valuation (34) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IRCKF (75) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.
IRCKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IRCKF’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's SMR Rating (51) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (53) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.
IRCKF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (61) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IRCKF’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (38) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.
| IRCKF | LW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DISYX | 23.12 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon International Stock Fund Y | |||
| GMVCX | 15.53 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity C | |||
| ECLCX | 32.04 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Growth C | |||
| BINCX | 24.00 | -0.09 | -0.37% |
| Brandes International Small Cap Equity C | |||
| RLBGX | 38.74 | -0.17 | -0.44% |
| American Funds American Balanced R6 | |||
IRCKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IRCKF and LW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRCKF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IRCKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRCKF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LW - IRCKF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| KRYAF - IRCKF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KRYAY - IRCKF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| JBS - IRCKF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| JDEPF - IRCKF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.