IRCKF
Price
$0.58
Change
+$0.03 (+5.45%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.81M
LW
Price
$60.86
Change
+$2.25 (+3.84%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IRCKF vs LW

Header iconIRCKF vs LW Comparison
Open Charts IRCKF vs LWBanner chart's image
Inter-Rock Minerals
Price$0.58
Change+$0.03 (+5.45%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization9.81M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$60.86
Change+$2.25 (+3.84%)
Volume$3.56M
Capitalization15.38B
IRCKF vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IRCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IRCKF vs. LW commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IRCKF is a Buy and LW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (IRCKF: $0.58 vs. LW: $60.86)
Brand notoriety: IRCKF and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IRCKF: 117% vs. LW: 154%
Market capitalization -- IRCKF: $9.81M vs. LW: $15.38B
IRCKF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $9.81M. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IRCKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IRCKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than IRCKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IRCKF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IRCKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IRCKF is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

IRCKF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +24.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.12% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than IRCKF($9.82M). LW has higher P/E ratio than IRCKF: LW (13.62) vs IRCKF (11.22). IRCKF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. LW (-7.728). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. IRCKF (3.48M). IRCKF has less debt than LW: IRCKF (1.28M) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than IRCKF: LW (6.35B) vs IRCKF (72.2M).
IRCKFLWIRCKF / LW
Capitalization9.82M15.4B0%
EBITDA3.48M1.34B0%
Gain YTD0.000-7.728-
P/E Ratio11.2213.6282%
Revenue72.2M6.35B1%
Total Cash4.93MN/A-
Total Debt1.28M3.63B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IRCKF vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
IRCKF
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2495
SMR RATING
1..100
5442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (43) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IRCKF (76) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that IRCKF’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (54) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (54) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as IRCKF (19) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to IRCKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IRCKFLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IRCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPAY60.750.54
+0.90%
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
UGE18.730.14
+0.75%
ProShares Ultra Consumer Staples
EQTY25.750.14
+0.54%
Kovitz Core Equity ETF
PGRO42.170.20
+0.47%
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
AIVC55.22N/A
N/A
Amplify Global Cloud Technology ETF

IRCKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRCKF and LW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRCKF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRCKF
1D Price
Change %
IRCKF100%
N/A
LW - IRCKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
KRYAF - IRCKF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAY - IRCKF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
JBS - IRCKF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
JDEPF - IRCKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+3.84%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
THS - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
FLO - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
POST - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
KHC - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More