ISHP
Price
$34.03
Change
+$0.20 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jun 9, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLY
Price
$113.69
Change
-$2.19 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jun 10, 02:37 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
22.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISHP vs XLY

Header iconISHP vs XLY Comparison
Open Charts ISHP vs XLYBanner chart's image
ISHP vs XLY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) vs. State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY)

Key Takeaways

  • ISHP offers targeted global exposure to the e-commerce theme through ~60 equally weighted holdings, contrasting XLY's market-cap weighted ~50 large-cap U.S. consumer discretionary stocks.
  • XLY boasts superior cost efficiency with a 0.08% expense ratio versus ISHP's 0.60%, making it more attractive for long-term holding.
  • ISHP exhibits higher diversification across sectors like consumer cyclical (41%), communication services (24%), and industrials (13%), while XLY is purely consumer discretionary focused.
  • XLY demonstrates stronger liquidity and scale with over $22 billion in assets under management (AUM), compared to ISHP's smaller ~$5 million AUM.
  • ISHP's quarterly rebalancing and equal-weighting promote balanced e-commerce bets; XLY tracks the S&P sector index with standard rebalancing.
  • XLY's heavy concentration in top holdings like AMZN (28%) and TSLA (20%) heightens single-stock risk relative to ISHP's ~2% per holding cap.

Introduction

Comparing the First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) highlights distinct approaches to consumer discretionary exposure in today's digital-driven market. ISHP targets the niche growth of global e-commerce, capturing online retail and related services amid rising digital adoption. XLY provides broad U.S. large-cap consumer discretionary coverage, encompassing retailers, automakers, and leisure firms. These ETFs appeal to investors seeking sector exposure but differ in geographic scope, theming, and structure—ISHP as a specialized thematic play, XLY as a core sector benchmark. With e-commerce penetration accelerating and consumer spending shifting online, this ETF comparison aids decisions on diversified sector bets versus focused digital trends.

First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) Overview

The First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is a passive ETF tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, which selects companies engaged in e-commerce across four business segments: online marketplaces, direct e-commerce, search engines, and e-commerce support services. It holds approximately 60 stocks, equally weighted with top holdings around 2% each, such as SNAP (1.97%), CVNA (1.94%), GOOGL (1.94%), BIDU (1.87%), and AMZN (1.82%). Sector allocations emphasize consumer cyclical (40.89%), communication services (24.48%), industrials (13.08%), and technology (10.24%). The expense ratio is 0.60%, with quarterly reconstitution and rebalancing to maintain equal weights. Launched in 2016, ISHP offers global diversification, including non-U.S. names, distinguishing it as a thematic fund focused on e-commerce infrastructure.

State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) Overview

The State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) passively tracks the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, comprising consumer discretionary firms from the S&P 500. It holds about 48 stocks in a market-cap weighted manner, with top holdings dominating: AMZN (27.93%), TSLA (19.81%), HD (5.20%), TJX (3.84%), and MCD (3.61%). As a pure-play sector ETF, its allocation is 100% consumer discretionary, spanning sub-industries like broadline retail (29%), automobiles (23%), and hotels/restaurants/leisure (22%). The expense ratio is a low 0.08%, with standard index rebalancing. Inception in 1998 underscores its established liquidity profile, ideal for broad sector rotation strategies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer discretionary sector, valued at trillions, thrives on spending beyond essentials, influenced by economic cycles, interest rates, and consumer confidence. E-commerce, a high-growth subset, benefits from mobile penetration, logistics advancements, and post-pandemic shifts, with global online sales projected to expand amid digital transformation. Catalysts include AI-driven personalization, supply chain efficiencies, and emerging markets' adoption. Risks encompass inflation squeezing budgets, geopolitical tensions disrupting trade, and regulatory scrutiny on tech giants. Capital flows favor cyclicals during expansions, with sector rotation from defensives. Macro drivers like falling rates could boost durables and leisure, while e-commerce resilience shines in downturns via value-seeking online shoppers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, XLY has shown resilience tied to U.S. large-cap momentum, particularly AMZN and TSLA earnings cycles, outperforming amid sector rotation into cyclicals. ISHP, with global e-commerce focus, experiences higher volatility from international exposure and equal-weighting, lagging in broad rallies but capturing niche upswings in digital platforms. XLY's beta around 1.18 reflects market sensitivity, versus ISHP's 1.11, but ISHP's diversification tempers single-stock risks. Relative positioning favors XLY in U.S.-centric booms, while ISHP aligns with e-commerce tailwinds like cloud logistics amid interest rate easing and commodity stability.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-backed decisions across asset classes including ETF comparison.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLY due to its cost efficiency, massive liquidity, and consistent trend alignment with U.S. consumer discretionary momentum. While ISHP provides compelling thematic diversification and global e-commerce purity, XLY's structural advantages—lower expense ratio, higher scale, and established sector positioning—offer a probabilistic edge in prevailing market environments focused on large-cap cyclicals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ISHP vs. XLY commentary
Jun 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISHP is a Hold and XLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLY has more net assets: 22.3B vs. ISHP (5.08M). XLY has a higher annual dividend yield than ISHP: XLY (-2.770) vs ISHP (-13.412). ISHP was incepted earlier than XLY: ISHP (10 years) vs XLY (28 years). XLY (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than ISHP (0.60). ISHP has a higher turnover XLY (10.00) vs XLY (10.00).
ISHPXLYISHP / XLY
Gain YTD-13.412-2.770484%
Net Assets5.08M22.3B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.08750%
Turnover41.0010.00410%
Yield1.520.74206%
Fund Existence10 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISHPXLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBNX14.390.52
+3.75%
Beta Bionics Inc
PRK176.002.49
+1.44%
Park National Corp
STE212.882.85
+1.36%
STERIS plc
MEGL1.290.02
+1.36%
Magic Empire Global Limited
NNOX1.67-0.15
-8.24%
NANO-X IMAGING Ltd

ISHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISHP has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISHP jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISHP
1D Price
Change %
ISHP100%
N/A
INTU - ISHP
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.84%
XYZ - ISHP
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
SE - ISHP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
WB - ISHP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
CHWY - ISHP
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More

XLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLY has been loosely correlated with ETSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XLY jumps, then ETSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLY
1D Price
Change %
XLY100%
+0.42%
ETSY - XLY
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
WHR - XLY
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.75%
UA - XLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
UAA - XLY
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
BBWI - XLY
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More