IWL vs MNST ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWL is a Hold and MNST is a Hold.
MNST | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IWL | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 61% |
IWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWL has been closely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWL jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWL | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| INTU - IWL | 70% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| MSFT - IWL | 69% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| CDNS - IWL | 67% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| NOW - IWL | 67% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| BLK - IWL | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| KO - MNST | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PRMW - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||