Advertisement
KO vs MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola (KO) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Coca-Cola (KO) has outperformed Monster Beverage (MNST) year-to-date, with a 13.17% return compared to 0.59%.
- KO offers a dividend yield of approximately 2.73%, providing income stability that MNST lacks.
- Recent quarters show KO delivering strong Q1 2026 revenue growth and raised full-year guidance, boosting sentiment.
- MNST faces near-term uncertainty from insider selling but benefits from energy drink demand ahead of its Q1 earnings.
- KO's P/E ratio (price-to-earnings, a valuation multiple) stands at 24.71 versus MNST's higher 39.75, signaling differing growth expectations.
- Analyst targets average $85.76 for KO and $85.38 for MNST, implying modest upside for both from current levels around $78 and $77.
Introduction
Coca-Cola (KO) and Monster Beverage (MNST) represent contrasting profiles in the non-alcoholic beverage sector: a century-old global icon with diversified offerings versus a high-growth energy drink specialist. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance drivers, and relative strengths amid shifting consumer preferences for healthier and functional drinks. Investors seeking stability and dividends may lean toward KO, while traders chasing momentum in premium segments might eye MNST. Understanding these dynamics aids decisions in a competitive landscape where pricing power and innovation dictate outperformance.
KO Overview and Recent Performance
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) dominates the global beverage market with a vast portfolio of soft drinks, waters, juices, and teas sold in over 200 countries. In recent market activity, shares have traded near their 52-week high of $82, reflecting resilience with a market cap exceeding $338 billion. Strong Q1 2026 results, including $12.47 billion in sales and raised full-year EPS (earnings per share) guidance, have driven positive sentiment, fueled by pricing actions and volume stability despite economic headwinds. The stock's year-to-date gain of 13.17% underscores steady demand for its core brands, bolstered by analyst upgrades and a robust dividend history.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) focuses on energy drinks, sports drinks, and alternatives, with Monster Energy as its flagship brand commanding significant market share. Shares hover around $77, within a 52-week range of $58 to $87, supported by a $75 billion market cap. Recent weeks have seen mixed signals, including insider sales totaling millions amid anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings on May 7. Prior strong quarters highlight international expansion and category growth, though year-to-date performance lags at 0.59%, pressured by valuation concerns and competition in functional beverages.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available on the platform, each designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots exhibit impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 23.53% to 163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Timeframes vary from 5 minutes to 49 days, catering to scalpers, swing traders, and long-term investors with approaches like semiconductor-focused (e.g., NVDA, AMD) or energy plays. This dynamic selection adapts to current market conditions, highlighting bots with superior risk-adjusted performance. Explore these tools to enhance your trading edge in volatile environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
KO’s business model emphasizes scale and diversification across beverages, contrasting MNST’s niche concentration in energy drinks, which exposes it to category-specific risks like health trends. Growth drivers differ: KO relies on global volume and pricing, while MNST pursues premiumization and international penetration. Recent momentum favors KO with superior YTD returns and post-earnings stability, versus MNST’s flat performance amid insider activity. Risk profiles show KO as lower volatility with dividends buffering downturns, while MNST offers higher beta for growth chasers. Market sentiment tilts toward KO’s reliability in consumer staples versus MNST’s cyclical appeal.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor KO over MNST, citing consistent upward trends, post-Q1 momentum, lower valuation multiples, and dividend support as key stabilizers in uncertain markets. While MNST holds growth potential from earnings catalysts, its recent lag and higher P/E suggest elevated risks. This positioning indicates higher probability of near-term outperformance for KO among trend-following strategies.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KO is a Hold and MNST is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +3.95% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +3.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
KO is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.90% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| KO | MNST | KO / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 355B | 90.8B | 391% |
| EBITDA | 19.2B | 2.71B | 710% |
| Gain YTD | 18.993 | 21.077 | 90% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.98 | 44.85 | 58% |
| Revenue | 49.3B | 8.79B | 561% |
| Total Cash | 13.8B | 2.99B | 462% |
| Total Debt | 43.9B | 199M | 22,060% |
KO | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KO's Valuation (56) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (87). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (11). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (36). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (28). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (62). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
| KO | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 30% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
KO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||