Advertisement
KO vs MNST
KO vs MNST Stock Comparison: Earnings Recap as Coca-Cola’s EPS Beat Meets Monster’s High-Growth Q4 Setup
Key Takeaways
- Coca-Cola (KO) reported Q4 2025 comparable EPS of $0.58, beating estimates of $0.56-0.57, but revenue of $11.8 billion missed expectations of $12.0 billion.
- KO's organic revenue grew 5% YoY, with unit case volume up 1%; full-year comparable EPS rose 4% to $3.00 amid currency headwinds.
- Monster Beverage (MNST) Q4 earnings are due February 26, with consensus EPS at $0.48-0.50 and revenue ~$2.04-2.1 billion, implying ~13% sales growth.
- MNST's Q3 2025 sales surged 16.8% to $2.20 billion, beating estimates; energy drinks drove strong international volume.
- KO offers stability with 2.7% dividend yield and P/E ~25x; MNST trades at ~46x P/E on higher growth but elevated valuation.
- KO shares fell ~2-4% post-earnings on revenue miss despite EPS beat and 2026 guidance of 4-5% organic revenue growth.
Earnings Context and Why This Comparison Matters
The Coca-Cola Company's (KO) Q4 2025 earnings, released February 10, 2026, highlight its defensive positioning in the non-alcoholic beverage sector amid shifting consumer preferences toward healthier options and economic pressures. As a global leader with products in over 200 countries, KO's results provide insights into pricing power, volume trends, and margin resilience. Comparing to Monster Beverage (MNST), a high-growth energy drink specialist, underscores trade-offs between stability and expansion. MNST's upcoming Q4 report will test its momentum in international markets and innovation-driven gains. Investors weigh KO's reliable dividends and scale against MNST's superior growth in the dynamic energy segment, especially as beverage giants navigate currency volatility and competition.
KO Earnings Focus
Coca-Cola reported Q4 2025 net revenue of $11.8 billion, up 2% YoY but below consensus estimates of $12.0-$12.04 billion. Organic revenue grew 5%, driven by 4% price/mix and 1% concentrate sales, with unit case volume up 1% led by Brazil, U.S., and Japan. Comparable EPS rose 6% to $0.58, topping estimates of $0.56-$0.57, despite 5-point currency headwinds; GAAP EPS was $0.53. A $960 million BODYARMOR impairment hit reported operating margin to 15.6%, but comparable margin expanded to 24.4%.
Full-year organic revenue grew 5%, comparable EPS up 4% to $3.00. 2026 guidance calls for 4-5% organic revenue growth and 7-8% comparable EPS growth. Shares dipped 2-4% post-release on the revenue shortfall, reflecting sensitivity to top-line execution.
MNST Context and Earnings Relevance
Monster Beverage's Q4 2025 earnings are scheduled for February 26, 2026. Consensus estimates project EPS of $0.48-$0.50, up ~31% YoY, and revenue around $2.04-2.1 billion, implying 13% growth. Recent Q3 results showed record $2.20 billion sales, +16.8% YoY and beating estimates by 4.3%, with adjusted EPS of $0.56 versus $0.48 expected. Operating income rose 40.7%, fueled by energy drink demand, product innovation, and international expansion (43% of sales). Market sentiment remains positive on MNST's volume momentum and supply chain efficiencies, though U.S. convenience channel softness poses risks.
AI Trading Bot Perspective
Tickeron provides AI-driven trading bots for both KO and MNST. For KO, the Swing Trader Tracking Dip Trends in Industrial Stocks uses 60-minute technical analysis to identify swing opportunities in dip trends, targeting short-term reversals. For MNST, the MNST Trading Results with Corridor TP-SL 2 AI Trading Agent employs a 60-minute corridor strategy with take-profit and stop-loss levels tailored to MNST's volatility. These bots offer automated, data-backed strategies for pattern recognition and risk management.
Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison
KO's Q4 EPS beat contrasts with revenue weakness from North America/Asia softness and impairments, yet organic metrics signal resilience versus MNST's explosive Q3 growth from energy category dominance. KO's full-year stability (5% organic growth, 31.2% comparable margins) suits defensive portfolios, while MNST's 16.8% sales surge highlights growth drivers like international volumes (+17.8% Q3). Valuation gaps persist: KO's ~25x P/E reflects mature scale and 2.7% yield; MNST's ~46x premiums faster expansion but amplifies risks from high multiples and U.S. channel pressures. Both face FX headwinds and health trends, but KO's diversification tempers volatility compared to MNST's category concentration. Sentiment favors MNST for upside, KO for consistency.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently favor MNST for its stronger earnings growth trajectory, international momentum, and category leadership, positioning it probabilistically ahead despite elevated valuations. KO appeals for stability post-earnings beat and guidance, but MNST's trends suggest higher near-term potential in a growth-oriented beverage market. This reflects observable patterns, not advice.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KO is a Hold and MNST is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +79.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
KO is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.39% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| KO | MNST | KO / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 331B | 79.2B | 418% |
| EBITDA | 18.7B | 2.53B | 738% |
| Gain YTD | 11.043 | 1.109 | 996% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.62 | 39.54 | 65% |
| Revenue | 47.9B | 8.29B | 578% |
| Total Cash | 15.8B | 2.77B | 571% |
| Total Debt | 45.5B | 199M | 22,864% |
KO | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KO's Valuation (38) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (91). This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (24). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (34). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (49). This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (68). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
| KO | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 29% | 7 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
KO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||