Advertisement
MNST vs PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PepsiCo (PEP) has outperformed Monster Beverage (MNST) year-to-date (YTD), with gains around 10% compared to MNST's modest 0.6% rise.
- MNST trades at a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 40 versus PEP's 25, reflecting its growth-oriented energy drink focus.
- Recent quarterly results show PEP delivering an earnings beat with stable sales growth, while MNST anticipates its next report amid insider selling concerns.
- PEP offers a dividend yield of about 3.6%, appealing to income investors, unlike the non-dividend-paying MNST.
- Both stocks benefit from beverage sector demand, but PEP's diversification into snacks provides broader stability.
- Market sentiment leans positive for both, with analysts maintaining buy ratings amid recent market activity.
Introduction
This MNST vs. PEP stock comparison examines two prominent players in the beverage industry: Monster Beverage, a leader in energy drinks, and PepsiCo, a diversified giant in soft drinks and snacks. Investors seeking growth potential may eye MNST's high-momentum profile, while those prioritizing stability and dividends might prefer PEP. In the current market environment, marked by consumer shifts toward healthier options and pricing pressures, understanding their relative performance, valuation, and catalysts is key for traders evaluating sector exposure and relative performance. This analysis draws on recent financial data to highlight contrasts in business models and market positioning.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) specializes in energy drinks, holding a strong position in a fast-growing segment driven by demand for high-energy beverages. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience with a roughly 4% gain over the past month but remains nearly flat YTD at about 0.6%. Trading around $77 with a market cap of $75 billion, MNST's P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) stands near 40, underscoring its premium valuation tied to sales growth. Key influences include robust Q4 2025 results with 18% revenue increase from energy drink volumes, offset by recent insider sales totaling millions, which have tempered sentiment. Analysts maintain buy ratings ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 7, citing ongoing category expansion despite competitive pressures.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) operates a broad portfolio spanning beverages like Pepsi and Gatorade alongside snacks such as Frito-Lay brands, providing diversified consumer staples exposure. The stock, trading near $157 with a $215 billion market cap, has advanced about 10% YTD and 0.4% over the past month. Its P/E ratio of around 25 reflects a value tilt, supported by EPS (earnings per share) of $6.38. Recent weeks feature a Q1 2026 earnings beat, with EPS of $1.61 surpassing estimates and revenue at $19.44 billion, fueled by pricing strategies and volume recovery. A new renewable energy deal in Europe bolsters sustainability efforts, while a 3.6% dividend yield attracts long-term holders. Analyst targets average $172, signaling optimism amid steady demand.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of over 350 available, curated for current market conditions among thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend-following, dip-buying, and multi-agent systems across timeframes from 5-minute scalps to multi-day swings. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from 24% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, though max drawdowns vary widely from $1,500 to $49,000. Focused on hot sectors like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and space stocks, they offer risk-managed virtual agents for copy trading. Explore these high-performing options to align with prevailing trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Monster Beverage (MNST) and PepsiCo (PEP) diverge in business models: MNST's pure-play energy drink focus drives higher growth but exposes it to niche volatility, while PEP's snacks-beverages mix ensures defensive resilience. Growth drivers favor MNST's volume expansion in energy categories versus PEP's pricing-led organic gains. Recent momentum tilts to PEP's 10% YTD advance over MNST's flat performance, with lower beta (0.3 vs. 0.6) indicating reduced risk. Valuation trade-offs show MNST's elevated P/E premium for potential upside against PEP's attractive yield and stability. Sector exposure overlaps in beverages but PEP benefits from snacks diversification. Sentiment remains constructive for both, though MNST faces insider selling headwinds while PEP gains from earnings strength.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PEP based on superior YTD trend consistency, recent earnings momentum, lower relative volatility, and dividend support amid stable consumer demand. MNST offers growth appeal if energy trends accelerate post-earnings, but observable factors like PEP's catalysts and market positioning suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance in the current environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNST is a Hold and PEP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110684.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-3.11% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| MNST | PEP | MNST / PEP | |
| Capitalization | 85.2B | 204B | 42% |
| EBITDA | 2.71B | 16.3B | 17% |
| Gain YTD | 13.591 | 4.830 | 281% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.07 | 23.41 | 180% |
| Revenue | 8.79B | 95.4B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 2.99B | 10.8B | 28% |
| Total Debt | 199M | 52.7B | 0% |
MNST | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (93). This means that PEP’s stock grew significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (72). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (35). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (57). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (44). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
| MNST | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 11 days ago 40% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IVRS | 33.29 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF | |||
| PZT | 22.20 | -0.24 | -1.07% |
| Invesco New York AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF | |||
| TLTD | 99.28 | -1.58 | -1.57% |
| FlexShares Mstar DevMks exUS FctTilt ETF | |||
| SCZ | 84.20 | -1.44 | -1.68% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | |||
| OPTZ | 43.38 | -0.83 | -1.87% |
| Optimize Strategy Index ETF | |||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| KO - PEP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.19% | ||
More | ||||