Advertisement
CCEP vs MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP operates as a major bottler for non-alcoholic beverages across 31 markets, delivering steady revenue growth and a shareholder-friendly buyback program.
- MNST focuses on energy drinks with leading brands like Monster Energy, showing stronger recent stock appreciation and upcoming earnings on August 6, 2026.
- Both stocks trade in the consumer defensive sector with low betas (CCEP at 0.48, MNST at 0.53), indicating defensive characteristics relative to broader market volatility.
- CCEP offers a dividend yield around 2.2% while MNST provides no dividend but trades at a higher trailing price-to-earnings ratio of 46.56 versus 22.4 for CCEP.
- Year-to-date returns through late July 2026 favored MNST at approximately 25.7% compared to 20.8% for CCEP, amid differing catalysts in their respective segments.
- Upcoming quarterly results—CCEP on August 4 and MNST on August 6—represent near-term focal points for sentiment assessment.
Introduction
This comparison examines CCEP and MNST, two consumer defensive stocks in the non-alcoholic beverages industry. CCEP serves as a primary bottler and distributor for established soft drink and energy brands across Europe, Australia, and the Pacific. MNST specializes in the development and marketing of energy drinks. Investors and traders seeking exposure to defensive consumer staples with varying growth profiles, dividend characteristics, and regional versus category-specific dynamics may find this relative performance and market positioning analysis relevant.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) produces, distributes, and sells a portfolio of non-alcoholic ready-to-drink beverages, including flagship Coca-Cola brands, in 31 markets. The company reported solid revenue expansion in recent trading updates, supported by volume growth in key categories such as Coca-Cola Zero Sugar. Recent market activity reflects continued execution on sustainability initiatives and a share buyback program, including a second tranche of up to €500 million announced earlier in 2026. Stock performance in recent weeks has been influenced by these capital return measures and broader sector stability, with the share price trading near $109 amid a 52-week range of $84.66 to $113.67. Low beta relative to the market has contributed to more measured price movements compared to growth-oriented peers.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) develops, markets, and distributes energy drinks and related beverages under brands including Monster Energy, Reign, and NOS. The company maintains a significant presence in the United States and international markets through a distribution agreement with The Coca-Cola Company. Recent market activity includes a 2-for-1 stock split effective August 11, 2026, alongside anticipation of second-quarter results scheduled for August 6. Year-to-date price appreciation has outpaced broader indices, supported by consistent earnings momentum and category leadership in energy beverages. The stock trades with a market capitalization near $94 billion and has demonstrated resilience amid varying consumer spending patterns.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, robust risk-adjusted returns, and consistent strategy execution earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with many exhibiting win rates above 60% and varying drawdown profiles depending on their specific algorithms. Users can explore detailed statistics for each bot directly on the platform. For further details on these AI-driven strategies, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CCEP and MNST differ in business model, with CCEP emphasizing scale in traditional soft drinks and distribution across multiple regions, while MNST concentrates on higher-growth energy drink innovation and branding. Growth drivers for CCEP include volume recovery and premiumization, tempered by currency and input cost pressures; MNST benefits from category expansion and new product variants. Recent momentum has tilted toward MNST on a year-to-date basis, though CCEP provides income via dividends absent from MNST. Risk factors encompass regulatory scrutiny on beverages for both, with CCEP facing additional geographic and foreign exchange exposure. Sector sentiment remains supportive of defensive staples, yet valuation differentials—lower price-to-earnings for CCEP versus elevated multiples for MNST—highlight trade-offs between stability and growth expectations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency in recent performance data, earnings visibility, and relative positioning within defensive sectors, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to MNST. Stronger year-to-date returns and category leadership in a high-margin segment contribute to this assessment, though CCEP offers greater stability through dividends and lower valuation multiples. Outcomes remain contingent on upcoming earnings releases and broader market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a Hold and MNST is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +98.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +7.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+7.93% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCEP | MNST | CCEP / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 47.2B | 91.4B | 52% |
| EBITDA | 3.35B | 2.83B | 118% |
| Gain YTD | 18.501 | 21.769 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.98 | 43.22 | 49% |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 9.22B | 227% |
| Total Cash | 2.06B | 1.17B | 175% |
| Total Debt | 12B | 199M | 6,030% |
CCEP | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEP's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (86) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (62) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (48) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (62) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 38% | 8 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 61% |
Advertisement
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 32% Poorly correlated | +5.28% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.20% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| COCO - MNST | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||