Advertisement
CCEP vs MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) is the world's largest independent Coca-Cola bottler, operating across more than 30 markets in Europe and Asia-Pacific.
- Monster Beverage (MNST) is a global energy-drink brand owner that leans on Coca-Cola's distribution network, giving it a lean, high-margin business model.
- Monster has delivered faster double-digit sales growth, while CCEP offers steadier, mid-single-digit growth with a meaningful dividend and buyback program.
- Both stocks reported strong recent results but pulled back on profit-taking, highlighting contrasting sentiment dynamics.
- Monster trades at a premium valuation (roughly 36–40 times forward earnings), while CCEP carries a more modest multiple.
- The two names represent different trade-offs: higher growth and valuation risk versus stability, income, and cash returns.
Introduction
Investors evaluating the beverage sector often encounter two very different business models under one corporate umbrella. CCEP is a bottler and distributor that converts the Coca-Cola system's brands into revenue across Europe and Asia-Pacific, while MNST is a brand owner that licenses much of its production and rides Coca-Cola's distribution reach. This stock comparison is relevant for traders assessing relative performance and momentum, as well as longer-term investors weighing growth against valuation, income, and risk. Recent market activity has put both names in focus, making the contrast in their market positioning particularly instructive.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners is the largest independent bottler within the Coca-Cola system, spanning Western Europe plus Australia, the Pacific, and Southeast Asia. Its results are driven by volume, price, and mix across a broad portfolio that includes sparkling soft drinks, zero-sugar lines, energy, sports, and hydration beverages.
In its first-half report for 2026, CCEP posted revenue of €10.72 billion, up 4.4% on a reported basis and 6.1% on a currency-neutral basis. Comparable operating profit rose 8.1% on a foreign-exchange-neutral basis, and diluted earnings per share (EPS) climbed about 9%. Management reaffirmed full-year guidance for 3% to 4% revenue growth, around 7% operating-profit growth, and at least €1.7 billion in comparable free cash flow, alongside a €1 billion share buyback.
Despite the solid figures, the stock pulled back in recent weeks after trading near all-time highs, with second-quarter revenue growth slowing versus the first quarter. Investors weighed a "challenging" consumer backdrop and uncertainty tied to the Middle East against CCEP's steady execution, share gains, and cash returns. The reaction reflects profit-taking rather than a fundamental deterioration.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage is a leading global energy-drink company whose portfolio includes Monster Energy, Reign, Bang, and strategic brands acquired from Coca-Cola. It owns few production facilities, instead leveraging Coca-Cola's distribution network, which supports gross margins above 55% and operating margins around 30%.
In its most recent quarter, Monster reported record net sales of $2.54 billion, up 20.2% year over year and exceeding $2.5 billion for the first time. Diluted EPS rose about 19%, and growth was broad-based across every geographic region. International sales climbed 34.6%, reaching roughly 46% of total net sales, with particularly strong gains in China, India, and Brazil. Monster also completed a 2-for-1 stock split in August 2026, a move widely read as a signal of management's confidence in continued growth.
Still, shares pulled back from recent highs even as the year-to-date and 12-month gains remained substantial. The pullback reflects a premium valuation and questions about whether the stock's growth trajectory can justify its multiple as the domestic energy category matures.
Trending AI Robots
For traders who want a data-driven, systematic lens on relative strength and momentum, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of automated trading strategies. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of covered securities. Because market conditions shift constantly, only a subset of these bots is considered well-suited to the current environment at any given time—and those are the ones highlighted in the Trending AI Robots section. The page lets users browse bots by performance and characteristics, helping them identify strategies aligned with present market conditions. Exploring the Trending AI Robots section can offer a useful starting point for evaluating how systematic models are positioning across names like CCEP and MNST.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between CCEP and MNST is growth versus stability. Monster is growing revenue at a double-digit pace, driven by international expansion and category penetration, whereas CCEP is growing at a low-to-mid single-digit rate. In exchange, CCEP offers a steadier earnings stream, an interim dividend, and an active buyback, while Monster reinvests more heavily in marketing and innovation.
Their business models also diverge. CCEP's bottler economics are capital-intensive and margin-thin relative to Monster's asset-light, brand-centric model. Monster's higher margins and faster growth support a premium valuation, but that premium leaves less room for error if momentum or margins disappoint. CCEP's more modest multiple reflects slower growth but also lower valuation risk.
Sentiment has moved in similar directions recently: both delivered strong reports yet saw shares pull back on profit-taking. Monster's pullback came off a much larger 12-month run, while CCEP's retreat followed an all-time high. On risk factors, Monster faces category maturation and input-cost pressure, while CCEP contends with a challenging European consumer environment and currency volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward Monster Beverage on a momentum basis, given its faster growth, broad international acceleration, and intact longer-term uptrend. However, that edge comes with greater valuation sensitivity. CCEP presents a more stable, income-supported profile with steadier cash flows, which systematic models may favor during periods of market uncertainty. In probabilistic terms, the AI verdict is conditional: MNST aligns more closely with trend-following and growth strategies, while CCEP fits defensive, stability-oriented approaches. The favored choice depends on whether current market conditions reward growth momentum or capital preservation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a Hold and MNST is a Hold.
CCEP's RSI Oscillator ascends from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for CCEP moved out of oversold territory on September 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 17 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 11 of the 17 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 65%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CCEP as a result. In 48 of 100 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CCEP just turned positive on September 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where CCEP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 24 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
CCEP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +1.08% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CCEP advanced for three days, in 190 of 352 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for CCEP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 10, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 44%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CCEP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 36%.
CCEP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CCEP entered a downward trend on October 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 32 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.803) is normal, around the industry mean (6.793). P/E Ratio (20.364) is within average values for comparable stocks, (43.051). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.715) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.014) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.873) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CCEP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
MNST's Indicator enters downward trend
The Aroon Indicator for MNST entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 113 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 58 of the 113 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 51%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MNST declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 47%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MNST as a result. In 54 of 94 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MNST just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where MNST's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
MNST moved above its 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MNST crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +3.25% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MNST advanced for three days, in 211 of 345 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
MNST may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MNST’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (8.757) is normal, around the industry mean (6.793). P/E Ratio (38.759) is within average values for comparable stocks, (43.051). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.153) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.014) among similar stocks. MNST's P/S Ratio (9.542) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.785).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
CCEP | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEP's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (88) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (57) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (38) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (91) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MNST (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (52) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 10 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 36% | 8 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 51% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MNST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +3.61% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.13% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| FIZZ - CCEP | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
More | ||||