Advertisement
CCEP vs MNST
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP and MNST both compete in the non-alcoholic beverage sector, with CCEP as a major bottler of Coca-Cola brands and MNST leading in energy drinks.
- Year-to-date performance is comparable at approximately 2.5-3% for both, but MNST shows stronger one-year returns of about 24% versus CCEP's 7%.
- CCEP trades at a lower P/E ratio of 18.9 with a 2.6% dividend yield, appealing to value investors, while MNST's P/E of 38.5 reflects growth expectations.
- Recent catalysts include CCEP's solid Q1 revenue growth and share buyback, contrasted by MNST's upcoming earnings and insider sales concerns.
- Both stocks maintain low betas around 0.5, indicating relative stability in volatile markets.
Introduction
This comparison examines CCEP and MNST, two prominent players in the non-alcoholic beverage industry. CCEP focuses on bottling and distributing established brands across Europe and Asia-Pacific, while MNST drives innovation in the high-growth energy drink category. Investors seeking exposure to consumer staples may weigh CCEP's stability and dividends against MNST's momentum in premium segments. Traders analyzing relative performance in recent market activity will find insights into valuation, growth drivers, and sentiment shifts valuable for portfolio decisions.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is a leading bottler of non-alcoholic beverages, producing and distributing brands like Coca-Cola, Monster Energy, and Schweppes across 31 countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, and beyond. In recent market activity, the stock has traded steadily around $94, within a 52-week range of $85-$111, supported by a market cap of $42 billion. Key influences include robust Q1 revenue of €5 billion, up 6.7% year-over-year, with reaffirmed full-year guidance for 3-4% revenue growth and about 7% operating profit expansion. A €1 billion share buyback program and ESG progress, such as 19% GHG reduction and increased recycled PET use, have bolstered sentiment. Volume growth and strategic investments have driven positive price behavior amid broader consumer staples resilience.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) develops and markets energy drinks under brands like Monster Energy, Reign, and NOS, alongside strategic and alcohol brands, serving global markets through bottlers and distributors. The stock has hovered near $75 in recent weeks, within a 52-week range of $58-$87, with a $73 billion market cap. Performance reflects strength from prior-quarter results emphasizing cost discipline and international expansion, particularly zero-sugar variants. However, insider sales and anticipation of Q1 earnings have introduced volatility. Energy drink demand and higher profit margins (23%) continue to support upward momentum, though margin pressures from costs temper enthusiasm in recent trading.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the top 25 AI-powered trading bots from over 351 available, each optimized for current market conditions across thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies, including 5-minute to 60-minute AI/ML signals, virtual agents, high win-rate patterns, and TP/SL corridors, targeting sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and small caps. Performance stats are compelling: annualized returns range from +40% to over +100%, win rates 50-70%, profit factors 1.5-4.5, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 8+. Whether short-term scalping or trend-following, these bots offer real-time signals for copy trading. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your timeframe and risk profile.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CCEP's business model centers on bottling operations with steady revenue from mature markets, contrasting MNST's brand-focused growth in dynamic energy drinks. Growth drivers for CCEP include volume expansion in emerging regions and sustainability initiatives, while MNST leverages international sales and product innovation like zero-sugar lines. Recent momentum favors MNST with superior one-year gains, though YTD figures align closely. Risk factors differ: CCEP faces currency fluctuations (FX risks) in Europe/Asia-Pacific, and MNST contends with input cost inflation and intense competition. Sector exposure ties both to consumer staples, but MNST's higher ROE (27%) signals efficiency trade-offs against CCEP's dividend appeal. Market sentiment leans stable for CCEP post-earnings, mixed for MNST amid insider activity.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward MNST based on consistent long-term trend outperformance, robust growth catalysts in energy beverages, and favorable positioning despite elevated valuation. CCEP offers stability and value, but MNST's momentum and margin strength provide higher probabilistic upside in the prevailing environment focused on consumer innovation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a StrongBuy and MNST is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +14.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1476.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.20% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCEP | MNST | CCEP / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 41.7B | 84.5B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 3.35B | 2.71B | 124% |
| Gain YTD | 3.032 | 12.704 | 24% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.61 | 41.74 | 45% |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 8.79B | 238% |
| Total Cash | 2.06B | 2.99B | 69% |
| Total Debt | 12B | 199M | 6,030% |
CCEP | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEP's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (24) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (91) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (58) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (78) in the null industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 37% | 28 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BATT | 17.87 | 0.47 | +2.70% |
| Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | |||
| KROP | 35.93 | 0.47 | +1.32% |
| Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | |||
| HWAY | 37.64 | 0.23 | +0.61% |
| Themes US Infrastructure ETF | |||
| VSS | 162.68 | 0.33 | +0.20% |
| Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US SmCp ETF | |||
| MUJ | 12.40 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| Blackrock Muniholdings NEW Jersey Quality Fund | |||
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| KO - CCEP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| KOF - CCEP | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||