IYW
Price
$253.28
Change
-$0.29 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Net Assets
25.44B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAGS
Price
$64.02
Change
-$1.42 (-2.17%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Net Assets
3.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYW vs MAGS

IYW vs MAGS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS)

Key Takeaways

  • IYW provides broad passive exposure to 139 U.S. technology stocks via the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, offering greater diversification than MAGS.
  • MAGS delivers concentrated active exposure to the "Magnificent Seven" stocks—Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), and Tesla (TSLA)—rebalanced quarterly to equal weight.
  • IYW's expense ratio is 0.38%, slightly higher than MAGS at 0.30%, but both feature tight bid-ask spreads (0.02%) indicating strong liquidity.
  • Sector focus differs: IYW emphasizes semiconductors (43%), tech hardware (20%), and software (19%); MAGS spans technology, communications, and consumer sectors via its holdings.
  • MAGS exhibits higher concentration risk but potential for amplified gains from mega-cap leaders; IYW offers lower single-stock volatility through broader holdings.
  • Both benefit from AI and tech momentum, with IYW showing steadier performance in recent market cycles due to diversification.

Introduction

In the evolving landscape of technology-driven markets, investors increasingly seek targeted exposure to U.S. tech innovation. The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) represent complementary yet distinct strategies within this space. IYW delivers comprehensive sector coverage, capturing a wide array of technology firms, while MAGS focuses on the dominant "Magnificent Seven" mega-caps powering AI, cloud computing, and electric vehicles. These ETFs appeal to those eyeing sector exposure versus concentrated bets on market leaders, especially amid ongoing AI adoption, semiconductor demand, and digital transformation trends. Comparing them highlights trade-offs in diversification, costs, and risk for tech-oriented portfolios.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passive fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, which includes large- and mid-cap U.S. equities in the technology sector. Launched in 2000, it holds 139 stocks, providing broad exposure while capping individual securities at 22.5% and issuers at 45% to mitigate concentration risk. Top holdings include NVDA (~16%), AAPL (~14%), GOOGL (~8%), GOOG (~6%), and AMD (~4%). Sector allocations feature semiconductors and equipment (43%), tech hardware and equipment (20%), software and services (19%), and media/entertainment (16%). The expense ratio is 0.38%, with high liquidity evidenced by average daily volume over 1 million shares and a 0.02% median bid-ask spread. IYW suits investors seeking diversified tech sector participation without active management.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) Overview

The Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS), launched in 2023, is an actively managed thematic fund providing equal-weight exposure to seven mega-cap leaders: Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), and Tesla (TSLA). It employs total return swaps for diversification compliance, rebalancing quarterly to maintain ~14% per stock. Holdings include cash equivalents and swaps alongside direct positions, with top exposures around 5-7% each recently due to structure. Sector tilt reflects holdings: heavy in technology, communications services, and consumer discretionary. Expense ratio stands at 0.30%, with robust liquidity (0.02% bid-ask spread). MAGS targets high-conviction plays on innovation drivers like AI and EVs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector remains propelled by artificial intelligence (AI) proliferation, semiconductor advancements, and cloud infrastructure expansion. Catalysts include surging demand for AI chips, with hyperscalers ramping capital expenditures (capex), and regulatory scrutiny on antitrust alongside supportive U.S. policies like the CHIPS Act (Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors). Capital flows favor mega-caps amid economic uncertainty, though risks encompass interest rate sensitivity, geopolitical tensions over supply chains (e.g., Taiwan), and valuation stretches. Macro drivers such as moderating inflation and productivity gains from AI bolster both ETFs, yet sector rotation toward value or broader equities could pressure growth-heavy names. Recent market cycles underscore tech resilience amid volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, both ETFs have mirrored tech sector strength, with IYW gaining around 20% over the past quarter and nearly 60% over the trailing year, driven by semiconductor leaders like NVDA and AMD. MAGS, with its equal-weight approach, has shown similar upside but amplified volatility from Tesla exposure and quarterly rebalances, outperforming in mega-cap rallies while lagging during rotations. IYW's broader base yields lower relative volatility (3-year standard deviation ~21%), benefiting from diversified earnings cycles beyond the Magnificent Seven. Positioning favors IYW for stability amid shifting AI capex and rate expectations; MAGS suits tactical bets on leaders. Performance ties to sector momentum rather than isolated moves.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like ETFs. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in tech and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors IYW for its superior diversification across 139 holdings, cost-effective passive structure, and consistent trend alignment with the broader tech sector. While MAGS offers lower fees and pure mega-cap momentum, its concentration elevates risk in volatile cycles. IYW's balanced exposure positions it probabilistically stronger for sustained sector tailwinds like AI diffusion, with ~70% confidence over 6-12 months based on structural metrics and historical relative stability.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYW vs. MAGS commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Hold and MAGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 25.4B vs. MAGS (3.54B). IYW has a higher annual dividend yield than MAGS: IYW (26.927) vs MAGS (-2.941). IYW was incepted earlier than MAGS: IYW (26 years) vs MAGS (3 years). MAGS (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than IYW (0.38). MAGS has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
IYWMAGSIYW / MAGS
Gain YTD26.927-2.941-916%
Net Assets25.4B3.54B718%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.30127%
Turnover7.0027.0026%
Yield0.111.388%
Fund Existence26 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYWMAGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAGY24.400.66
+2.77%
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Cov Cll ETF
TNA73.711.94
+2.70%
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF
BJUL54.130.04
+0.08%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF July
OVM21.79N/A
-0.02%
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
FLYT10.68-1.46
-12.03%
Tradr 2X Long FLY Daily ETF

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
-0.11%
NVDA - IYW
76%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
LRCX - IYW
71%
Closely correlated
+5.27%
AMD - IYW
68%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
AVGO - IYW
68%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
MU - IYW
66%
Closely correlated
+6.82%
More

MAGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAGS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAGS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGS
1D Price
Change %
MAGS100%
-2.17%
AMZN - MAGS
70%
Closely correlated
-4.75%
TSLA - MAGS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
NVDA - MAGS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
META - MAGS
66%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
GOOGL - MAGS
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.99%
More