In the current market environment, technology ETFs like IYW and PSI attract investors seeking growth amid AI infrastructure expansion and digital transformation. IYW delivers comprehensive U.S. technology sector exposure, capturing software, hardware, and services. PSI, by contrast, provides targeted access to semiconductors—a critical subset powering AI chips and computing. While not direct competitors, they offer alternative strategies: IYW for diversified tech participation and PSI for concentrated bets on semiconductor momentum. This comparison highlights structural differences, aiding decisions on broad versus specialized exposure in a sector rotation landscape favoring innovation-driven equities.
The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passive fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, which measures U.S. equities in the technology sector with caps to limit concentration (22.5% per holding, 45% top five). It holds 139 stocks, providing broad diversification across software, hardware, semiconductors, and related areas. Top holdings typically include NVDA (~16%), AAPL (~14%), GOOGL (~8%), GOOG (~6%), and AMD (~4%). Sector allocation emphasizes technology (~81%), with communication services (~18%), industrials (~1%), and minor others. The expense ratio is 0.38%, reflecting cost efficiency. IYW rebalances per index methodology, exhibits strong liquidity (average daily volume over 1 million shares), and suits investors wanting market-cap-weighted tech exposure without excessive single-stock risk.
The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) is a passive ETF tracking the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index, which applies a quantitative model selecting ~30 U.S. semiconductor firms based on momentum, earnings, quality, management, and value factors. It maintains 31–32 holdings for focused exposure. Top holdings often feature MXL (~9%), AMD (~7%), MU (~6%), TXN (~4.5%), and AVGO (~4.5%). Nearly 98% allocates to technology (semiconductors ~65%, equipment ~30%), with minor industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.56%. Quarterly rebalancing aligns with the index's rules. PSI's concentrated structure amplifies semiconductor-specific risks and rewards, appealing to thematic investors despite lower liquidity than broader peers.
The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives amid surging AI demand, projected to drive global chip sales toward $975 billion in 2026 per industry forecasts. Catalysts include hyperscaler data center buildouts, edge AI proliferation, and 5G/electric vehicle adoption, boosting demand for advanced chips. Capital flows favor AI enablers, with regulatory pushes like CHIPS Act supporting U.S. manufacturing resilience. Macro drivers—easing interest rates and robust earnings—sustain momentum, though risks persist: supply chain disruptions, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan), and potential demand corrections post-boom. Both ETFs navigate this dynamic, with semiconductors as a high-beta subsector amid broader tech rotation.
Over recent market cycles, PSI has outperformed IYW in semiconductor upswings, delivering superior returns (e.g., higher annualized gains over 5–10 years) due to its focused exposure amid AI chip rallies. IYW, with broader diversification, exhibits lower volatility, providing steadier positioning during sector rotations away from chips toward software/services. In recent months, both advanced amid tech momentum, but PSI's concentration amplified gains from holdings like AMD and MU, while IYW benefited from stable giants like AAPL. Volatility differences highlight PSI's higher beta, tying to cyclical earnings and commodity-like chip pricing, versus IYW's relative resilience linked to recurring software revenues and macro shifts.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. It identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore the AI Screener today to uncover hidden gems in tech and beyond.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors IYW for its superior diversification (139 holdings), lower expense ratio (0.38%), cost efficiency, trend consistency in broad tech rallies, and reduced volatility profile. While PSI excels in high-momentum semiconductor phases (~70% probability of outperformance in such cycles), IYW's structural strength and liquidity position it better for sustained market exposure amid rotating risks. This assessment reflects observable factors, not advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IYW | PSI | IYW / PSI | |
| Gain YTD | 20.101 | 113.283 | 18% |
| Net Assets | 26.8B | 2.91B | 922% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.56 | 68% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 78.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.05 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| IYW | PSI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IWDL | 62.59 | 0.87 | +1.40% |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Fctr TR ETN | |||
| BSMZ | 25.61 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2035 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| LDUR | 95.61 | 0.04 | +0.04% |
| PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | |||
| WOOD | 66.80 | -0.96 | -1.41% |
| iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | |||
| MPG | 5.48 | -0.36 | -6.24% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long MP Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSI | 100% | -5.16% | ||
| LRCX - PSI | 86% Closely correlated | -5.66% | ||
| TER - PSI | 84% Closely correlated | -7.44% | ||
| KLAC - PSI | 84% Closely correlated | -3.93% | ||
| AMAT - PSI | 83% Closely correlated | -6.16% | ||
| SYNA - PSI | 83% Closely correlated | -3.68% | ||
More | ||||