IYW
Price
$253.93
Change
+$9.10 (+3.72%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
24.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PSI
Price
$175.47
Change
+$7.58 (+4.51%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYW vs PSI

Header iconIYW vs PSI Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs PSIBanner chart's image
IYW vs PSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI)

Key Takeaways

  • IYW provides broad exposure to the U.S. technology sector with 139 holdings, while PSI offers concentrated exposure to 31–32 semiconductor companies using a quantitative selection model.
  • IYW's top holdings include mega-caps like NVDA (around 16%), AAPL (14%), and GOOGL, emphasizing diversified tech leaders; PSI features mid-cap names like MXL (9%) alongside AMD and MU.
  • Sector allocation: IYW is ~81% technology with communication services (~18%); PSI is nearly 98% technology/semiconductors, heightening its subsector focus.
  • IYW boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.38% versus PSI's 0.56%, alongside superior liquidity via higher average daily volume.
  • PSI exhibits higher volatility due to its narrow focus but has shown stronger returns in semiconductor-favorable market cycles; IYW offers more stability through diversification.
  • Both benefit from AI-driven demand, but IYW suits broad tech investors, while PSI targets high-conviction semiconductor plays.

Introduction

In the current market environment, technology ETFs like IYW and PSI attract investors seeking growth amid AI infrastructure expansion and digital transformation. IYW delivers comprehensive U.S. technology sector exposure, capturing software, hardware, and services. PSI, by contrast, provides targeted access to semiconductors—a critical subset powering AI chips and computing. While not direct competitors, they offer alternative strategies: IYW for diversified tech participation and PSI for concentrated bets on semiconductor momentum. This comparison highlights structural differences, aiding decisions on broad versus specialized exposure in a sector rotation landscape favoring innovation-driven equities.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passive fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, which measures U.S. equities in the technology sector with caps to limit concentration (22.5% per holding, 45% top five). It holds 139 stocks, providing broad diversification across software, hardware, semiconductors, and related areas. Top holdings typically include NVDA (~16%), AAPL (~14%), GOOGL (~8%), GOOG (~6%), and AMD (~4%). Sector allocation emphasizes technology (~81%), with communication services (~18%), industrials (~1%), and minor others. The expense ratio is 0.38%, reflecting cost efficiency. IYW rebalances per index methodology, exhibits strong liquidity (average daily volume over 1 million shares), and suits investors wanting market-cap-weighted tech exposure without excessive single-stock risk.

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) Overview

The Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) is a passive ETF tracking the Dynamic Semiconductor Intellidex Index, which applies a quantitative model selecting ~30 U.S. semiconductor firms based on momentum, earnings, quality, management, and value factors. It maintains 31–32 holdings for focused exposure. Top holdings often feature MXL (~9%), AMD (~7%), MU (~6%), TXN (~4.5%), and AVGO (~4.5%). Nearly 98% allocates to technology (semiconductors ~65%, equipment ~30%), with minor industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.56%. Quarterly rebalancing aligns with the index's rules. PSI's concentrated structure amplifies semiconductor-specific risks and rewards, appealing to thematic investors despite lower liquidity than broader peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives amid surging AI demand, projected to drive global chip sales toward $975 billion in 2026 per industry forecasts. Catalysts include hyperscaler data center buildouts, edge AI proliferation, and 5G/electric vehicle adoption, boosting demand for advanced chips. Capital flows favor AI enablers, with regulatory pushes like CHIPS Act supporting U.S. manufacturing resilience. Macro drivers—easing interest rates and robust earnings—sustain momentum, though risks persist: supply chain disruptions, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan), and potential demand corrections post-boom. Both ETFs navigate this dynamic, with semiconductors as a high-beta subsector amid broader tech rotation.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, PSI has outperformed IYW in semiconductor upswings, delivering superior returns (e.g., higher annualized gains over 5–10 years) due to its focused exposure amid AI chip rallies. IYW, with broader diversification, exhibits lower volatility, providing steadier positioning during sector rotations away from chips toward software/services. In recent months, both advanced amid tech momentum, but PSI's concentration amplified gains from holdings like AMD and MU, while IYW benefited from stable giants like AAPL. Volatility differences highlight PSI's higher beta, tying to cyclical earnings and commodity-like chip pricing, versus IYW's relative resilience linked to recurring software revenues and macro shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. It identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore the AI Screener today to uncover hidden gems in tech and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IYW for its superior diversification (139 holdings), lower expense ratio (0.38%), cost efficiency, trend consistency in broad tech rallies, and reduced volatility profile. While PSI excels in high-momentum semiconductor phases (~70% probability of outperformance in such cycles), IYW's structural strength and liquidity position it better for sustained market exposure amid rotating risks. This assessment reflects observable factors, not advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYW vs. PSI commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Hold and PSI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 24.3B vs. PSI (2.86B). PSI has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: PSI (112.896) vs IYW (22.656). IYW was incepted earlier than PSI: IYW (26 years) vs PSI (21 years). IYW (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than PSI (0.56). PSI has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
IYWPSIIYW / PSI
Gain YTD22.656112.89620%
Net Assets24.3B2.86B850%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.5668%
Turnover7.0078.009%
Yield0.110.05224%
Fund Existence26 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYWPSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DON56.650.57
+1.02%
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF
FLAU35.020.35
+1.00%
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
MFDX42.190.23
+0.55%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
HELS24.380.07
+0.29%
Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF
SMCL41.96-4.56
-9.80%
GraniteShares 2x Long SMCI Daily ETF

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
+0.61%
NVDA - IYW
76%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
LRCX - IYW
70%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
AVGO - IYW
68%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
AMD - IYW
67%
Closely correlated
+4.73%
KLAC - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
+5.55%
More

PSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSI has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSI jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSI
1D Price
Change %
PSI100%
+3.00%
LRCX - PSI
85%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
TER - PSI
84%
Closely correlated
+5.72%
AMAT - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
SYNA - PSI
83%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
MPWR - PSI
82%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
More