IYW
Price
$241.25
Change
-$15.17 (-5.92%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
25.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTUM
Price
$152.78
Change
-$13.71 (-8.23%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
6.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYW vs QTUM

Header iconIYW vs QTUM Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs QTUMBanner chart's image
IYW vs QTUM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

Key Takeaways

  • IYW provides broad U.S. technology sector exposure with 139 holdings and a low expense ratio of 0.38%, heavily weighted toward mega-cap leaders like NVDA and AAPL.
  • QTUM targets the niche thematic area of quantum computing and machine learning with 86 global holdings and a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.40%, featuring more balanced weights around 2% per top holding.
  • IYW offers superior liquidity and scale with over $24 billion in assets under management (AUM), compared to QTUM's approximately $4.7 billion AUM.
  • Both ETFs maintain high technology sector allocations (IYW nearly 100%, QTUM around 82%), but QTUM diversifies into industrials (10%) and includes international firms.
  • QTUM's modified equal-weighting and higher turnover (42%) introduce greater volatility tied to emerging tech trends, while IYW's market-cap approach emphasizes established growth drivers.
  • Cost efficiency and diversification favor IYW for core exposure, while QTUM suits investors seeking high-conviction bets on quantum innovation.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving technology landscape, investors often weigh broad sector exposure against targeted thematic opportunities. The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) represent complementary strategies within the tech universe. IYW delivers comprehensive access to U.S. technology leaders, capturing established innovators across software, hardware, and semiconductors. QTUM, by contrast, focuses on the frontier of quantum computing and machine learning, offering exposure to global pioneers in these disruptive fields. This ETF comparison highlights their structural differences, enabling investors to align choices with risk tolerance and growth outlooks amid ongoing AI and computing advancements.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passively managed fund that tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, a float-adjusted market-cap-weighted benchmark of U.S. equities in the technology sector. This index caps individual issuers at 22.5% and the aggregate of those over 4.5% at 45% to mitigate concentration risk, with quarterly reviews and annual reconstitution.

Key structural features include 139 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.38%. Top holdings dominate, with NVDA (~16%), AAPL (~14%), GOOGL (~7-8%), GOOG (~6%), and MSFT (~4%) comprising over 40% of assets. Sector allocations emphasize semiconductors and equipment (38%), software and services (23%), and tech hardware (21%), with minor communication services exposure.

IYW's large scale ($24B+ AUM) supports strong liquidity, making it ideal for expressing a sector view with proven stability.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

The Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) passively tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index (BQTUM), a modified equal-weighted portfolio of global companies deriving significant revenue from quantum computing, machine learning hardware, software, or related big data applications.

Structural highlights feature 86 holdings and a 0.40% expense ratio. Top holdings are evenly distributed: INTC (2.96%), MU (2.82%), Global Unichip Corp. (2.45%), MediaTek Inc. (2.36%), and STMicroelectronics NV (STM) (2.13%), with the top 10 at under 21%. Sector breakdown tilts to technology (82%), industrials (10%), and communication services.

QTUM's global scope and thematic focus, with quarterly rebalances, position it for innovation-driven growth, though with elevated turnover (42%).

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector remains a market powerhouse, propelled by AI proliferation, semiconductor demand, and computing paradigms. Broad tech benefits from mega-cap earnings cycles and sector rotation into growth amid moderating interest rates. Quantum computing emerges as a key catalyst, with breakthroughs in hardware like superconducting chips and applications in optimization, drug discovery, and cybersecurity drawing capital flows. Market forecasts project the quantum sector growing at a 26.7% CAGR through 2046, fueled by R&D investments from governments and firms. Regulatory support and geopolitical pushes for tech sovereignty amplify tailwinds, though risks include high R&D costs, technical hurdles, and valuation stretches in nascent areas.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, IYW has delivered steady gains tied to U.S. tech giants' dominance in AI infrastructure and cloud computing, exhibiting lower volatility through diversified mega-cap exposure. QTUM has shown higher relative upside in periods of thematic enthusiasm, outperforming in recent months amid quantum hype and machine learning momentum, but with amplified drawdowns during risk-off rotations. IYW's market-cap tilt favors stability from sector leaders' earnings resilience, while QTUM's equal-weight structure amplifies mid-cap innovators sensitive to innovation cycles and global supply chains. Volatility profiles reflect IYW's beta around 1.36 versus QTUM's elevated sensitivity to emerging trends.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in tech and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IYW due to its structural advantages in cost efficiency (0.38% expense ratio), superior liquidity, broader diversification across proven U.S. tech leaders, and consistent trend alignment with sector momentum. While QTUM offers compelling exposure to high-growth quantum themes, its narrower focus and modest cost premium elevate risk without commensurate near-term edge in observable metrics. Investors may tilt toward IYW for probable outperformance in stable environments, blending core stability with upside potential.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYW vs. QTUM commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Hold and QTUM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 25.5B vs. QTUM (6.14B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: QTUM (39.604) vs IYW (20.863). IYW was incepted earlier than QTUM: IYW (26 years) vs QTUM (8 years). IYW (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
IYWQTUMIYW / QTUM
Gain YTD20.86339.60453%
Net Assets25.5B6.14B415%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.4095%
Turnover7.0042.0017%
Yield0.110.7315%
Fund Existence26 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYWQTUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTZ9.871.14
+13.06%
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
JXI83.850.40
+0.48%
iShares Global Utilities ETF
VTES101.10-0.06
-0.06%
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exmpt Bd ETF
SURE140.98-2.82
-1.96%
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF
CGMM31.37-0.68
-2.12%
Capital Group U.S. Small & Mid Cap ETF

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
-5.92%
NVDA - IYW
75%
Closely correlated
-6.20%
LRCX - IYW
69%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
AVGO - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
-7.92%
MKSI - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
-8.65%
AMD - IYW
64%
Loosely correlated
-10.86%
More

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
-8.23%
LRCX - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
MKSI - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
-8.65%
ONTO - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
-7.83%
AMAT - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
-9.71%
TSM - QTUM
71%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
More