Q | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| JHDG | Q | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 29% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that JHDG and Q have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHDG and Q's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHDG | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| Q - JHDG | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| AMAT - JHDG | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| MU - JHDG | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.61% | ||
| AVGO - JHDG | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| NEM - JHDG | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.43% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Q has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if Q jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.