Advertisement
JHG vs SEIC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Janus Henderson Group (JHG) vs. SEI Investments Company (SEIC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- JHG has significantly outperformed SEIC year-to-date, with returns around 8% compared to under 1%.
- JHG offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 3.1%, versus 1.3% for SEIC.
- JHG trades at a lower P/E ratio (9.85) than SEIC (14.46), suggesting better value metrics.
- Both stocks operate in financial services, but JHG focuses on asset management while SEIC emphasizes investment processing and technology solutions.
- Recent weeks show SEIC gaining momentum ahead of earnings, while JHG remains stable near 52-week highs.
- JHG experienced takeover bid activity in recent months, influencing sentiment positively post-withdrawal.
Introduction
This comparison examines JHG and SEIC, two established players in the financial services sector focused on asset management and investment solutions. Investors seeking dividend income, exposure to wealth management growth, or value in financial stocks may find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning. Traders monitoring momentum in a volatile environment can assess recent trends, sector catalysts, and risk profiles to inform strategies. With both companies navigating interest rate shifts and market flows, this head-to-head highlights key trade-offs for portfolio consideration.
JHG Overview and Recent Performance
Janus Henderson Group plc (JHG) is an asset management holding company providing equity, fixed income, and balanced portfolios to institutional, retail, and high-net-worth clients worldwide. It manages assets under management (AUM, total value of investments overseen) across public equities, fixed income, real estate, and private equity, with a focus on growth capital and specialized sectors like healthcare and financial services.
In recent market activity, JHG has traded stably near its 52-week high around $53, with shares hovering in the low $50s. Year-to-date gains exceed 8%, outpacing broader markets, driven by strong one-year returns over 70%. Sentiment has been bolstered by the withdrawal of a takeover bid from Victory Capital in recent weeks, reducing uncertainty and allowing focus on organic flows and new product launches like income ETFs. Lower P/E (9.85) and attractive dividend yield (3.1%) support value appeal amid favorable equity flows.
SEIC Overview and Recent Performance
SEI Investments Company (SEIC) is a financial services firm offering wealth management, retirement solutions, asset administration, and investment processing to institutional investors, advisors, and corporations. It leverages technology for outsourcing, advisory, and platform services across equities, fixed income, and alternatives.
Recent weeks have seen SEIC exhibit upward momentum, with shares climbing from mid-$70s to over $80, reflecting gains ahead of quarterly earnings. Year-to-date performance is modest at under 1%, with one-year returns around 15%. Positive drivers include new client wins, expansion into alternatives like litigation finance, and a partnership with IBM for agentic AI (artificial intelligence focused on autonomous actions) to enhance operations. Analyst adjustments and an upcoming earnings report have spurred short-term interest, though shares remain mid-range in their 52-week span.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing bots curated from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, technical analysis (TA), and fundamental analysis (FA), operating on timeframes from 5 minutes to daily. Performance stats highlight win rates of 54-88%, annualized returns from 15-168%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 for leaders. Several target financial sectors, including investment banks (e.g., GS, MS) and brokers (SCHW, IBKR), relevant for stocks like JHG and SEIC. Explore these bots to align with your trading style and current market conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
JHG and SEIC both serve the financial services sector but differ in models: JHG emphasizes traditional asset management with AUM growth via flows and products, while SEIC focuses on technology-driven processing, administration, and outsourcing for scalability.
Growth drivers contrast with JHG benefiting from equity market rallies and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) speculation, versus SEIC's client acquisitions and AI integrations. Recent momentum favors JHG's sustained uptrend, though SEIC shows short-term strength.
Risk factors include market volatility and interest rates impacting AUM/NII (net interest income), with JHG more exposed to outflows and SEIC to tech competition. Market sentiment leans positive for JHG on valuation and dividends, positioning it for income-focused investors over SEIC's growth trade-off.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI tools currently lean toward JHG over SEIC, based on superior trend consistency, year-to-date outperformance, lower valuation multiples, and higher dividend yield. JHG's stability near highs and post-bid clarity provide probabilistic edge in the near term, though SEIC catalysts like earnings could shift dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHG is a Hold and SEIC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- JHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JHG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- JHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SEIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
JHG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
JHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.14% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| JHG | SEIC | JHG / SEIC | |
| Capitalization | 7.98B | 10.8B | 74% |
| EBITDA | 1.2B | 1.04B | 116% |
| Gain YTD | 8.808 | 9.022 | 98% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.25 | 15.26 | 67% |
| Revenue | 3.17B | 2.37B | 134% |
| Total Cash | 2.6B | 395M | 657% |
| Total Debt | 396M | 69.5M | 570% |
JHG | SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JHG's Valuation (15) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEIC (88). This means that JHG’s stock grew significantly faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (48). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's SMR Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (55). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.
JHG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (49). This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JHG (79). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.
| JHG | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 28% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | +0.95% | ||
| RJF - SEIC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| AMP - SEIC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| STT - SEIC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| KKR - SEIC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||