Advertisement
SEIC vs STT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? SEI Investments (SEIC) vs. State Street (STT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- STT has demonstrated superior recent momentum, with shares advancing over 11% year-to-date (YTD) compared to SEIC's modest 0.7% gain.
- Both firms reported robust quarterly earnings in recent periods, but STT achieved 19% profit growth and revenue up 15.6%.
- SEIC trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of about 14.5, slightly below STT's 15.1, suggesting potential value.
- STT provides a dividend yield near 2.4%, attracting income-focused investors, while SEIC recently increased its payout.
- STT's larger $40 billion market cap offers scale in custody services versus SEIC's $10 billion focus on investment platforms.
- Tickeron’s AI models currently favor STT for its trend strength and catalysts.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines SEIC (SEI Investments Company) and STT (State Street Corporation), two key players in the financial services sector specializing in asset management and servicing. Investors and traders evaluating exposure to custody banking, investment processing, and related technologies may find value in contrasting their recent market positioning, performance trends, and growth drivers. Amid evolving market conditions, including interest rate dynamics and demand for digital solutions, understanding relative strengths helps assess opportunities in this space for portfolios seeking stability or momentum.
SEIC Overview and Recent Performance
SEI Investments Company (SEIC) delivers technology-driven solutions for asset management, including investment processing, wealth platforms, and retirement services to institutional and private clients. In recent market activity, SEIC shares have shown mixed behavior, with modest gains over the past month amid broader financial sector volatility but declines over three months. Strong Q4 2025 results, featuring record EPS (earnings per share) of $1.38 and 9.1% revenue growth to $608 million, bolstered sentiment. Partnerships like the IBM collaboration for agentic AI and client wins have supported positioning, though upcoming earnings add near-term focus. High ROE (return on equity) near 29% highlights efficiency.
STT Overview and Recent Performance
State Street Corporation (STT) is a leading provider of custody, asset servicing, and investment management, serving institutional investors through platforms like State Street Alpha for analytics and trading. Recent weeks have seen STT shares rally, up over 17% in the past month following Q1 2026 earnings that beat estimates with $2.84 EPS, 19% profit rise, and $3.8 billion revenue (up 15.6%). Expansion in ETF servicing with Thornburg Investment Management has enhanced growth outlook. YTD gains exceed 11%, driven by servicing fees and market appreciation, though quarterly revenue growth shows variability.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the top 25 AI-powered trading bots from its library of 351, chosen for their strong performance in current volatile markets across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 15.5% to 167.8%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Trading styles vary from swing and trend following to multi-agent strategies and leveraged ETF plays, with average trade durations from 1 day to 55 days and focus on sectors like semiconductors, finance, and energy. Ideal for copy trading without minimum balances, they adapt to market conditions. Traders can explore these high-potential options to enhance strategies.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While both operate in financial services, SEIC emphasizes outsourced investment platforms and processing for advisers, contrasting STT’s dominance in custody and fund administration for massive institutional AUM (assets under management). Growth drivers differ: SEIC benefits from tech integrations, while STT leverages fee-based servicing amid ETF expansion. Recent momentum favors STT with sharper YTD and one-year gains; risk profiles are stable with low debt/equity (SEIC at 1%, STT balanced). Sector exposure ties both to financials, but STT’s scale tempers volatility. Market sentiment tilts positive for STT post-earnings, versus SEIC’s steady but range-bound trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors STT with higher probability for near-term outperformance, owing to consistent upward trends, earnings catalysts, partnership momentum, and superior relative positioning versus benchmarks. SEIC remains viable for value-oriented stability but trails in recent trend consistency.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEIC is a Hold and STT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SEIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 5 green FA rating(s).
- SEIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STT’s FA Score: 5 green, 0 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SEIC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SEIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SEIC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.33% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| SEIC | STT | SEIC / STT | |
| Capitalization | 10.6B | 44.2B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 1.04B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.023 | 25.495 | 28% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.98 | 16.22 | 92% |
| Revenue | 2.37B | 14.5B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 395M | 4.43B | 9% |
| Total Debt | 69.5M | 29.2B | 0% |
SEIC | STT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 17 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STT's Valuation (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEIC (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SEIC (34) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
STT's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SEIC (32) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (51) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
STT's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (71) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
| SEIC | STT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 49% | 9 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 53% | 6 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| RJF - SEIC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| AMP - SEIC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| STT - SEIC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| BLK - SEIC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
STT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.