AMP
Price
$506.84
Change
+$6.68 (+1.34%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.96B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SEIC
Price
$95.44
Change
+$0.71 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.37B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMP vs SEIC

AMP vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMP vs. SEIC commentary
Jul 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a StrongBuy and SEIC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2026
Stock price -- (AMP: $500.16 vs. SEIC: $94.73)
Brand notoriety: AMP and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMP: 76% vs. SEIC: 71%
Market capitalization -- AMP: $44.96B vs. SEIC: $11.37B
AMP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $44.96B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $158.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMP and SEIC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMP is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.25% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMP is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.40% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMP($45B) has a higher market cap than SEIC($11.4B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than AMP: SEIC (16.17) vs AMP (12.46). SEIC YTD gains are higher at: 16.172 vs. AMP (2.678). SEIC has less debt than AMP: SEIC (69.5M) vs AMP (5.81B). AMP has higher revenues than SEIC: AMP (18.9B) vs SEIC (2.37B).
AMPSEICAMP / SEIC
Capitalization45B11.4B395%
EBITDAN/A1.04B-
Gain YTD2.67816.17217%
P/E Ratio12.4616.1777%
Revenue18.9B2.37B798%
Total Cash45.8BN/A-
Total Debt5.81B69.5M8,365%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMP vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
AMP
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2725
SMR RATING
1..100
1932
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8272
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMP's Valuation (84) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (89) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AMP (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's SMR Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (32) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AMP (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AMP (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMPSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLPH1.360.11
+8.80%
Talphera
RVTY112.953.60
+3.29%
Revvity
LWAY30.910.62
+2.05%
Lifeway Foods
BRUN30.200.36
+1.22%
Boost Run Inc
TALO13.73-0.50
-3.51%
Talos Energy

AMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMP
1D Price
Change %
AMP100%
+1.95%
RJF - AMP
75%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
PFG - AMP
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
SEIC - AMP
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
STT - AMP
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
CG - AMP
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
+0.23%
RJF - SEIC
71%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
AMP - SEIC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
STT - SEIC
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
TROW - SEIC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
APAM - SEIC
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
More