Advertisement
AMP vs SEIC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ameriprise Financial (AMP) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Ameriprise Financial (AMP) boasts a larger market capitalization of approximately $42 billion compared to SEI Investments (SEIC)'s $10 billion, reflecting greater scale in diversified financial services.
- Both stocks have shown similar momentum in recent weeks, with monthly gains around 3-4%, amid anticipation for quarterly earnings reports.
- AMP trades at a lower P/E ratio (price-to-earnings, a key valuation metric) of about 12.6 versus SEIC's 14.5, suggesting potentially better value.
- SEIC has outperformed over the past year with roughly 13-14% returns compared to AMP's 1-2%, driven by client wins and partnerships.
- AMP exhibits higher beta (a measure of volatility relative to the market) at 1.2, while SEIC is steadier at 0.94.
- Analyst sentiment is mixed for both, with recent price target adjustments ahead of earnings, highlighting sector-wide interest rate and market sensitivities.
Introduction
Ameriprise Financial (AMP) and SEI Investments (SEIC) are prominent players in the asset management and wealth management sectors, offering investors exposure to financial services amid evolving market conditions. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent stock performance, and key metrics to aid traders seeking relative value in the financial space and long-term investors evaluating growth potential versus stability. With both companies navigating interest rate shifts and client asset flows, understanding their head-to-head positioning provides insights into sector trends and stock comparison opportunities.
AMP Overview and Recent Performance
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (AMP) is a diversified financial services firm providing wealth management, asset management, insurance, and annuities, managing significant assets under management (AUM, total client investments overseen). In recent market activity, AMP shares have gained around 3% over the past month, trading near $457 within a 52-week range of $422 to $550. Performance has been influenced by anticipation for Q1 earnings, where analysts expect strong results based on historical beats, alongside mixed analyst updates like Morgan Stanley's price target reduction to $452. Sentiment reflects broader financial sector dynamics, including net interest income (NII, revenue from interest-bearing assets) pressures and positive investor satisfaction scores from JD Power surveys.
SEIC Overview and Recent Performance
SEI Investments Company (SEIC) operates as an asset management holding company, delivering technology-driven platforms for wealth management, retirement services, and institutional investing. Recently, SEIC stock has risen about 4% in the past month, hovering around $81 in a 52-week range of $69 to $94. Key drivers include new client acquisitions and partnerships, such as with IBM for AI-enhanced transformation, boosting operational efficiency. Upcoming earnings are expected to show growth, with recent analyst adjustments like lowered targets from Keefe Bruyette and Piper Sandler, amid steady revenue increases from prior quarters. Market positioning benefits from its focus on scalable investment processing solutions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of over 350 available, curated for current market conditions across thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies, timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days, and styles targeting sectors like semiconductors, finance, and small caps. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 168%, win rates as high as 88%, profit factors reaching 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 22. Finance-focused bots trade tickers like GS and SCHW, offering automated pattern recognition and risk management. Traders can explore these high-performing options to enhance strategies in volatile markets—visit the page to discover bots suited to your portfolio.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both AMP and SEIC operate in asset management but differ in scale and focus: AMP emphasizes retail wealth advice and insurance for broader client bases, while SEIC specializes in institutional platforms and retirement tech. Growth drivers for AMP include AUM expansion and earnings beats, contrasting SEIC's client inflows and AI partnerships. Recent momentum is comparable short-term, but SEIC shows superior one-year returns. Risk profiles highlight AMP's higher beta and market sensitivity versus SEIC's stability. Sector exposure ties both to financials, with sentiment influenced by rate environments and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI tools, analyzing trend consistency, valuation, and catalysts, currently lean toward AMP for its lower P/E, larger scale, and history of earnings outperformance, positioning it favorably in a growth-oriented financial sector. However, SEIC appeals for relative stability and longer-term gains. This probabilistic edge reflects observable market data rather than guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AMP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SEIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.79% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMP is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+0.17% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| AMP | SEIC | AMP / SEIC | |
| Capitalization | 42B | 10.8B | 389% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.04B | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.041 | 9.684 | -42% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.65 | 15.26 | 76% |
| Revenue | 18.9B | 2.37B | 798% |
| Total Cash | 45.8B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.81B | 69.5M | 8,365% |
AMP | SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMP's Valuation (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (87) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
AMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (31) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
AMP's SMR Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (32) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AMP (55) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AMP (83) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.
| AMP | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 28% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 57% | 10 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| RJF - SEIC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| AMP - SEIC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| STT - SEIC | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| KKR - SEIC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||