AMP
Price
$545.84
Change
+$1.38 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
48.25B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SEIC
Price
$102.98
Change
-$0.06 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
12.36B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMP vs SEIC

AMP vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ameriprise Financial (AMP) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Ameriprise Financial and SEI Investments both operate in the asset and wealth management industry but differ significantly in scale, client focus, and business structure.
  • AMP has demonstrated robust momentum in recent weeks, supported by strong advisor-driven wealth management flows and a diversified financial services platform.
  • SEIC continues to benefit from steady institutional demand for its technology-enabled investment processing and asset management solutions.
  • Both companies maintain solid balance sheets, though their revenue drivers and growth trajectories reflect distinct strategic priorities.
  • Market sentiment has favored AMP's broader retail wealth management exposure, while SEIC's technology-centric model offers a different risk-reward profile.
  • AI-driven analysis from Tickeron's platform suggests a measurable divergence in trend strength between the two stocks under current market conditions.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the financial services sector often encounter two distinct yet overlapping business models: the comprehensive wealth management franchise and the institutional investment technology provider. AMP (Ameriprise Financial) and SEIC (SEI Investments) represent these respective approaches, making a side-by-side stock comparison particularly instructive. This analysis examines how both companies have navigated recent market conditions, explores their relative positioning, and assesses what observable data may signal about their near-term trajectories. Whether you are a retail investor seeking exposure to wealth management trends or an institutional observer tracking fintech-adjacent asset managers, understanding the contrasts between AMP and SEIC can sharpen decision-making.

AMP Overview and Recent Performance

Ameriprise Financial is a diversified financial services holding company whose primary operations span wealth management, asset management, and retirement and protection solutions. The firm's advisor network remains a cornerstone of its business, generating recurring fee-based revenue through financial planning and investment advisory services. In recent weeks, AMP shares have reflected strong investor confidence, supported by consistent net inflows into the firm's wealth management segment and resilient advisory fee income. The broader market environment — characterized by elevated interest rates and sustained demand for personalized financial guidance — has generally worked in Ameriprise's favor. Analysts have noted the company's capital management discipline, including share repurchase activity, as an additional factor bolstering per-share metrics. While sector-wide concerns about market volatility persist, AMP's diversified revenue streams across advice, asset management, and insurance have provided a degree of earnings stability that the market appears to be rewarding.

SEIC Overview and Recent Performance

SEI Investments is a global provider of investment processing, investment management, and investment operations solutions, primarily serving institutional investors, banks, wealth managers, and high-net-worth clients. The company's technology-driven platform differentiates it from traditional asset managers, enabling clients to outsource complex operational functions. Over recent weeks, SEIC shares have traded with relative steadiness, reflecting the company's recurring revenue model and long-term contractual relationships. SEI's assets under management and administration have been influenced by market movements and organic business development activity. The company's continued investment in its technology platform and expansion of its private banking and institutional segments have drawn measured attention from market observers. However, SEIC's growth profile, while stable, has not generated the same degree of momentum that some peers with stronger retail wealth exposure have experienced in the current environment.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of top-performing algorithmic trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots spanning thousands of tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — from swing trading to long-term trend following — across various timeframes and asset classes. Many of the featured robots showcase impressive statistical profiles, with some achieving win rates above 70% and generating annualized returns that substantially outperform their benchmarks. Each bot displays transparent performance metrics, including trade history, Sharpe ratios, and maximum drawdown figures. Exploring the Trending AI Robots section can help you identify which algorithmic strategies are currently resonating with market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing AMP and SEIC, several structural differences emerge. Ameriprise Financial operates a more horizontally integrated model, combining human advisor-driven wealth management with proprietary asset management and insurance capabilities. This integration creates multiple revenue touchpoints with retail clients, but it also exposes the firm to advisor recruitment and retention dynamics. SEI Investments, by contrast, leverages a technology-first approach focused on institutional clients and intermediary platforms, generating revenue through processing fees, software subscriptions, and asset-based management fees. In terms of growth drivers, AMP benefits from demographic tailwinds as aging populations seek retirement planning, while SEIC's growth is tied more closely to institutional outsourcing trends and technology adoption. Risk factors also diverge: AMP faces regulatory and reputational risks inherent to retail financial advice, whereas SEIC must continually invest in technological infrastructure to maintain its competitive moat. From a market sentiment perspective, recent trading patterns suggest stronger near-term momentum for AMP, though SEIC's steadier, less volatile profile may appeal to different investor preferences.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend patterns, relative strength indicators, and the consistency of positive price action in recent weeks, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a modest preference for AMP over SEIC under current market conditions. AMP's combination of strong wealth management inflows, diversified revenue streams, and sustained upward price momentum presents a more favorable near-term technical and fundamental alignment. SEIC remains a well-managed company with a resilient business model, but its recent price behavior has lacked the same degree of directional conviction. It is important to note that AI-based assessments reflect probabilistic evaluations of historical and current data rather than certainties about future performance. Market conditions can shift rapidly, altering the relative attractiveness of either stock. Investors should weigh these AI-generated insights alongside their own research, risk tolerance, and investment objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
AMP vs. SEIC commentary
Aug 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMP is a Buy and SEIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 01, 2026
Stock price -- (AMP: $545.84 vs. SEIC: $102.98)
Brand notoriety: AMP and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMP: 68% vs. SEIC: 83%
Market capitalization -- AMP: $48.25B vs. SEIC: $12.36B
AMP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $48.25B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than AMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMP is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.20% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMP is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.71% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMP($48.3B) has a higher market cap than SEIC($12.4B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than AMP: SEIC (18.16) vs AMP (13.60). SEIC YTD gains are higher at: 26.289 vs. AMP (12.055). SEIC has less debt than AMP: SEIC (69.5M) vs AMP (5.81B). AMP has higher revenues than SEIC: AMP (18.9B) vs SEIC (2.37B).
AMPSEICAMP / SEIC
Capitalization48.3B12.4B390%
EBITDAN/A1.04B-
Gain YTD12.05526.28946%
P/E Ratio13.6018.1675%
Revenue18.9B2.37B798%
Total Cash45.8BN/A-
Total Debt5.81B69.5M8,365%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMP vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
AMP
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4237
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2119
SMR RATING
1..100
1932
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7739
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMP's Valuation (84) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AMP (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's SMR Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (32) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

AMP's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SEIC (40) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMP (77) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMPSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTIM1.40N/A
N/A
Good Times Restaurants
PAM88.32-0.37
-0.42%
Pampa Energia SA
TEL205.69-0.89
-0.43%
TE CONNECTIVITY Ltd
GRPN27.58-0.31
-1.11%
Groupon
FOA22.75-0.43
-1.86%
Finance of America Companies

AMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMP
1D Price
Change %
AMP100%
+0.25%
RJF - AMP
78%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
PFG - AMP
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SEIC - AMP
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
STT - AMP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
CG - AMP
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-0.06%
RJF - SEIC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
AMP - SEIC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
BLK - SEIC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
KKR - SEIC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
STT - SEIC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More