JLL
Price
$311.84
Change
-$1.91 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
14.87B
42 days until earnings call
LRHC
Price
$7.85
Change
+$0.22 (+2.88%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JLL vs LRHC

Header iconJLL vs LRHC Comparison
Open Charts JLL vs LRHCBanner chart's image
Jones Lang LaSalle
Price$311.84
Change-$1.91 (-0.61%)
Volume$443.06K
Capitalization14.87B
La Rosa Holdings
Price$7.85
Change+$0.22 (+2.88%)
Volume$38.35K
Capitalization9.34M
JLL vs LRHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JLL vs. LRHC commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLL is a StrongBuy and LRHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (JLL: $311.84 vs. LRHC: $7.85)
Brand notoriety: JLL and LRHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JLL: 103% vs. LRHC: 19%
Market capitalization -- JLL: $14.87B vs. LRHC: $9.34M
JLL [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $14.87B. LRHC’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $9.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLRHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LRHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JLL is a better buy in the long-term than LRHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JLL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JLL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LRHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRHC is a better buy in the short-term than JLL.

Price Growth

JLL (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while LRHC (@Real Estate Development) price change was +4.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

JLL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.15% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JLL($14.9B) has a higher market cap than LRHC($9.34M). JLL YTD gains are higher at: 23.189 vs. LRHC (-88.379). JLL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.24B vs. LRHC (-22.66M). JLL has more cash in the bank: 401M vs. LRHC (5.1M). LRHC has less debt than JLL: LRHC (9.97M) vs JLL (4.11B). JLL has higher revenues than LRHC: JLL (24.7B) vs LRHC (78M).
JLLLRHCJLL / LRHC
Capitalization14.9B9.34M159,563%
EBITDA1.24B-22.66M-5,481%
Gain YTD23.189-88.379-26%
P/E Ratio26.79N/A-
Revenue24.7B78M31,667%
Total Cash401M5.1M7,870%
Total Debt4.11B9.97M41,242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JLL: Fundamental Ratings
JLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JLLLRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACLS89.812.51
+2.88%
Axcelis Technologies
AKA10.840.18
+1.71%
aka Brands Holding Corp
EPIX0.19N/A
+0.52%
ESSA Pharma
CLMB132.840.46
+0.35%
Climb Global Solutions
UTHR397.97-5.14
-1.28%
United Therapeutics Corp

JLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JLL
1D Price
Change %
JLL100%
-0.61%
CBRE - JLL
90%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
NMRK - JLL
84%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
CWK - JLL
82%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
CIGI - JLL
78%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
MMI - JLL
66%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
More

LRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRHC has been loosely correlated with SHMSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRHC jumps, then SHMSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRHC
1D Price
Change %
LRHC100%
+2.88%
SHMSF - LRHC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DOUG - LRHC
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
FSV - LRHC
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
CWK - LRHC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
JLL - LRHC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More