NTAP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| JMID | NTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GLDI | 148.84 | 0.09 | +0.06% |
| UBS ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | |||
| SMLL | 22.31 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | |||
| FJP | 77.77 | -0.13 | -0.17% |
| First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| FLGV | 19.97 | -0.04 | -0.20% |
| Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| SPY | 776.34 | -1.54 | -0.20% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that JMID and PLTR have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMID and PLTR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMID | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| PLTR - JMID | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| JBL - JMID | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| NTAP - JMID | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| BAH - JMID | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ENPH - JMID | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTAP has been closely correlated with DELL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTAP jumps, then DELL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| DELL - NTAP | 68% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| HPQ - NTAP | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.80% | ||
| WDC - NTAP | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.41% | ||
| LOGI - NTAP | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| STX - NTAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.65% | ||
More | ||||