Advertisement
KMTS vs RGEN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMTS is a Hold and RGEN is a Hold.
RGEN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| KMTS | RGEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KMTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while RGEN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KMTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RGEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KMTS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGEN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KMTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RGEN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
KMTS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.07% price change this week, while RGEN (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -4.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
KMTS is expected to report earnings on Dec 10, 2026.
RGEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-2.16% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
Advertisement
KMTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMTS has been loosely correlated with BDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMTS jumps, then BDX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMTS | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| BDX - KMTS | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| RGEN - KMTS | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| MMSI - KMTS | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ICUI - KMTS | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| NVST - KMTS | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||
RGEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGEN has been closely correlated with DHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGEN jumps, then DHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGEN | 100% | +2.52% | ||
| DHR - RGEN | 67% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| A - RGEN | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| BIO - RGEN | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| MTD - RGEN | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| TMO - RGEN | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||