KRUS
Price
$51.15
Change
-$0.50 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
621.46M
120 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SG
Price
$8.27
Change
-$0.09 (-1.08%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
982.7M
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRUS vs SG

KRUS vs SG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRUS vs. SG commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRUS is a StrongBuy and SG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (KRUS: $51.15 vs. SG: $8.27)
Brand notoriety: KRUS and SG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRUS: 71% vs. SG: 52%
Market capitalization -- KRUS: $621.46M vs. SG: $982.7M
KRUS [@Restaurants] is valued at $621.46M. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $982.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $193.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRUS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the long-term than KRUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KRUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than KRUS.

Price Growth

KRUS (@Restaurants) experienced а -8.84% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was +2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.13% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SG($983M) has a higher market cap than KRUS($621M). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than SG: KRUS (292.35) vs SG (68.92). SG YTD gains are higher at: 22.337 vs. KRUS (-2.255). SG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 92.6M vs. KRUS (14.8M). SG has more cash in the bank: 157M vs. KRUS (44.3M). KRUS has less debt than SG: KRUS (208M) vs SG (356M). SG has higher revenues than KRUS: SG (675M) vs KRUS (319M).
KRUSSGKRUS / SG
Capitalization621M983M63%
EBITDA14.8M92.6M16%
Gain YTD-2.25522.337-10%
P/E Ratio292.3568.92424%
Revenue319M675M47%
Total Cash44.3M157M28%
Total Debt208M356M58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KRUS vs SG: Fundamental Ratings
KRUS
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8572
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
9288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SG's Valuation (98) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's SMR Rating (88) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KRUS (92) in the null industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

SG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KRUS (59) in the null industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (99) in the null industry. This means that SG’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRUSSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMOIX40.13N/A
N/A
GMO International Equity III
HRCVX20.97N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income A
FAGKX76.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Strategies K
CHAIX22.27N/A
N/A
Chase Growth Institutional
RIREX82.40-0.19
-0.23%
American Funds Capital Inc Bldr R-4

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
-0.97%
SG - KRUS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
FWRG - KRUS
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
FRSH - KRUS
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.54%
BJRI - KRUS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
CAKE - KRUS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-1.08%
CMG - SG
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.91%
CAVA - SG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.54%
BROS - SG
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
BJRI - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More