NTES | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MCHS | NTES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 63% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BAI | 47.80 | 0.61 | +1.29% |
| iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | |||
| IGE | 62.32 | 0.69 | +1.12% |
| iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) | |||
| PHDG | 41.34 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) | |||
| HBRD | 23.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) | |||
| GDMN | 82.30 | -0.71 | -0.86% |
| WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with ACMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then ACMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 33% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| AAOI - MCHS | 29% Poorly correlated | +8.12% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| NTES - MCHS | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTES has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTES jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTES | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| BILI - NTES | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| YMM - NTES | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| SOHU - NTES | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| RIOT - NTES | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| CLSK - NTES | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
More | ||||