LAUR
Price
$38.31
Change
-$0.10 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
5.28B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LOPE
Price
$145.34
Change
-$4.79 (-3.19%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAUR vs LOPE

LAUR vs LOPE Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Laureate Education (LAUR) vs. Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Laureate Education (LAUR) operates five higher education institutions across Mexico and Peru, serving approximately 500,000 students, while Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) functions as a third-party education services provider to 20 university partners, with Grand Canyon University (GCU) accounting for roughly 97% of partner enrollments.
  • In recent months, LAUR has demonstrated notably stronger price momentum and relative performance, while LOPE has faced persistent downward pressure despite solid underlying operating metrics.
  • Both companies delivered full-year 2025 revenue growth — LAUR at 9% ($1.70 billion) and LOPE at 7.1% ($1.11 billion) — yet their market capitalizations and valuation multiples reflect meaningfully different investor expectations.
  • LOPE offers substantially higher per-share profitability (as-adjusted diluted EPS of $9.08 for FY2025) and wider operating margins, while LAUR benefits from a net cash balance sheet and a recently expanded share repurchase program.
  • Key risk factors diverge sharply: LAUR faces foreign exchange exposure tied to the Mexican peso and Peruvian sol, while LOPE contends with significant client concentration risk and regulatory scrutiny in the U.S. higher education sector.

Introduction

Investors scanning the education services landscape frequently encounter two distinct but comparably sized names: LAUR (Laureate Education) and LOPE (Grand Canyon Education). Though both operate within the broader post-secondary education ecosystem, their business models, geographic footprints, and recent stock market trajectories diverge in ways that make a side-by-side comparison especially instructive. This stock comparison is relevant for traders seeking to understand relative performance dynamics, as well as longer-term investors evaluating growth durability, margin quality, and risk exposures in the for-profit education space. With both companies reporting full-year 2025 results in recent months and issuing forward guidance for 2026, the data offers a timely lens through which to assess market positioning.

LAUR Overview and Recent Performance

Laureate Education, Inc., headquartered in Miami, Florida, is the largest private higher education operator in Mexico and Peru. Through five institutions — including Universidad del Valle de México (UVM) and Universidad Tecnológica de México (UNITEC) in Mexico, and Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), Universidad Privada del Norte (UPN), and CIBERTEC in Peru — the company serves roughly 498,000 students across more than 50 campuses and a growing online platform. Its programs concentrate on high-demand fields such as medicine and health sciences, engineering and information technology, and business and management.

Full-year 2025 results reflected solid operational momentum. Revenue rose 9% to $1.70 billion, while new enrollments climbed 8% and total enrollments increased 5%. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached $518.9 million, representing a 30.5% margin and a 15% year-over-year improvement. Notably, the company ended 2025 in a net cash position of $17.6 million, a rarity among publicly traded education companies. In early 2026, the board authorized a $150 million increase to the existing share repurchase program, bringing total authorization to $400 million and signaling management confidence in the company's free cash flow generation.

In recent weeks, LAUR shares have traded near the upper end of their 52-week range, supported by upbeat 2026 guidance that calls for revenue of $1.89–$1.91 billion and adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $1.95–$2.03. The stock's lower beta of approximately 0.40 suggests relatively muted sensitivity to broader market swings, though the company remains exposed to currency translation risk from the Mexican peso and Peruvian sol. Analysts covering the stock have maintained a consensus Buy rating, with a mean price target above the prevailing trading range.

LOPE Overview and Recent Performance

Grand Canyon Education, Inc., based in Phoenix, Arizona, operates a fundamentally different model: it is not a university operator but rather a comprehensive education services provider. The company delivers technology, academic counseling, marketing, financial aid processing, and back-office support to a network of 20 university partners. Its dominant client relationship is with Grand Canyon University (GCU), which accounted for approximately 97% of total partner enrollments at year-end 2025. The company also operates a growing network of 47 off-campus classroom and laboratory sites primarily serving accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing (ABSN) programs.

For full-year 2025, LOPE reported service revenue of $1.11 billion, a 7.1% increase driven by a 7.1% rise in total partner enrollments to 136,239. GCU online enrollments grew 8.7% to over 107,000, while off-campus ABSN enrollments surged 16.6%. On a GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) basis, net income declined 4.4% to $216.2 million, weighed down by a $35.0 million litigation settlement related to a qui tam lawsuit — a type of whistleblower action under the False Claims Act. However, adjusted operating margin expanded to 28.3%, underscoring the underlying earnings power of the asset-light services model. Adjusted diluted EPS reached $9.08 for the year.

Despite these reasonably solid operational metrics, LOPE shares have faced meaningful selling pressure in recent months. The stock has declined noticeably from levels above $180 earlier in 2026 to the mid-$140s in late July, and is trading near the lower end of its 52-week range. Investor sentiment appears to be weighing client concentration risk, the one-time litigation charge, and broader uncertainty around U.S. higher education regulation. The company's 2026 guidance projects service revenue of $1.17–$1.19 billion and diluted EPS of $9.55–$10.16, but markets have thus far been reluctant to re-rate the shares higher. LOPE has a beta of roughly 0.57, indicating moderate market sensitivity.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where sector rotation and relative strength shifts can unfold rapidly, traders increasingly turn to data-driven tools to filter noise from signal. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to identify statistically favorable trade setups across thousands of tickers. With hundreds of bots available on the platform — each employing distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters — only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. The bots vary widely in their approach: some target short-term momentum patterns, others focus on trend-following signals, and many specialize in specific sectors or technical formations. Historical performance data, win rates, and trade frequency statistics are displayed transparently, enabling users to evaluate each bot's track record at a glance. For traders seeking an objective, algorithm-driven perspective on stocks like LAUR and LOPE, exploring the Trending AI Robots section may provide a valuable complement to traditional fundamental analysis.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between LAUR and LOPE extends well beyond headline industry classification. LAUR generates revenue directly from student tuition across its owned institutions in Latin America, giving it operational control over pricing, curriculum, and campus expansion but also exposing it to enrollment cyclicality and local economic conditions. LOPE, by contrast, earns service fees under long-term contracts with university partners — a model that produces higher operating margins (28.3% adjusted vs. LAUR's roughly 25–26%) and requires less capital intensity, but concentrates risk in a small number of client relationships.

On valuation, the divergence is stark. LAUR trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 19–20 with a market capitalization near $5.2 billion, while LOPE's trailing P/E sits around 15–16 on a market cap of roughly $3.7 billion. The discount applied to LOPE likely reflects the concentrated client risk and the ongoing regulatory overhang surrounding GCU's status. On a per-share basis, LOPE's adjusted earnings power ($9.08 in FY2025) dwarfs that of LAUR ($1.72 adjusted), but the gap in absolute earnings does not translate into superior stock performance — a reminder that multiple compression can overwhelm fundamental growth.

Growth drivers also differ meaningfully. LAUR benefits from favorable demographic and participation-rate trends in Mexico and Peru, where demand for affordable private higher education continues to outpace public-sector capacity. The opening of two new campuses in 2025 and ongoing investments in digital and AI capabilities support its enrollment growth trajectory. LOPE's growth, meanwhile, hinges on expanding its off-campus ABSN site network, deepening relationships with non-GCU partners, and leveraging its proprietary technology platform — including its Halo learning management system — to drive efficiency and student outcomes.

From a risk perspective, LAUR investors must monitor foreign exchange fluctuations, as a weakening Mexican peso or Peruvian sol can erode reported results even when local-currency performance is strong. LOPE investors must contend with regulatory developments at the U.S. Department of Education, the resolution of legal matters, and the ever-present risk that GCU could alter its service arrangement. Both companies carry no dividend, making total return entirely dependent on capital appreciation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative momentum, and balance sheet positioning, Tickeron's AI-oriented analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for LAUR over LOPE. LAUR has demonstrated steadier price action over recent months, maintained a trajectory closer to its 52-week highs, and benefits from the tailwind of an active share buyback program and a net cash balance sheet. LOPE, while fundamentally profitable and operationally sound, has struggled with deteriorating price momentum and appears to be undergoing a period of multiple compression that has yet to stabilize. That said, for investors who prioritize margin quality and per-share earnings power — and who can tolerate client concentration risk — LOPE's compressed valuation may present a different type of opportunity. In probabilistic terms, LAUR currently exhibits the stronger combination of trend alignment and fundamental support, but both stocks warrant close monitoring as market conditions and sector sentiment evolve.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LAUR vs. LOPE commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAUR is a StrongBuy and LOPE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (LAUR: $38.31 vs. LOPE: $145.34)
Brand notoriety: LAUR and LOPE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAUR: 75% vs. LOPE: 75%
Market capitalization -- LAUR: $5.28B vs. LOPE: $3.79B
LAUR [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $5.28B. LOPE’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $9.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAUR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOPE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAUR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOPE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAUR is a better buy in the long-term than LOPE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAUR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOPE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAUR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LOPE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAUR is a better buy in the short-term than LOPE.

Price Growth

LAUR (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +3.54% price change this week, while LOPE (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +3.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +7.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAUR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

LOPE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+7.28% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAUR($5.28B) has a higher market cap than LOPE($3.79B). LOPE (17.55) and LAUR (17.33) have similar P/E ratio . LAUR YTD gains are higher at: 13.781 vs. LOPE (-12.609). LAUR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 578M vs. LOPE (359M). LOPE has more cash in the bank: 275M vs. LAUR (162M). LOPE has less debt than LAUR: LOPE (104M) vs LAUR (734M). LAUR has higher revenues than LOPE: LAUR (1.83B) vs LOPE (1.14B).
LAURLOPELAUR / LOPE
Capitalization5.28B3.79B139%
EBITDA578M359M161%
Gain YTD13.781-12.609-109%
P/E Ratio17.3317.5599%
Revenue1.83B1.14B160%
Total Cash162M275M59%
Total Debt734M104M706%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAUR vs LOPE: Fundamental Ratings
LAUR
LOPE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
263
SMR RATING
1..100
3533
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4070
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOPE's Valuation (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LAUR (82). This means that LOPE’s stock grew similarly to LAUR’s over the last 12 months.

LAUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOPE (63). This means that LAUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOPE’s over the last 12 months.

LOPE's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LAUR (35). This means that LOPE’s stock grew similarly to LAUR’s over the last 12 months.

LAUR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LOPE (70). This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to LOPE’s over the last 12 months.

LAUR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOPE (70). This means that LAUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOPE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAURLOPE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LOPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDWU4.490.14
+3.22%
T-REX 2X LONG RDW DAILY TARGET ETF
VOOG81.291.13
+1.41%
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
WEED18.940.21
+1.12%
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
BOE12.11-0.03
-0.25%
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust
EPHE25.56-0.13
-0.51%
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF

LAUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAUR has been loosely correlated with PRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAUR jumps, then PRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAUR
1D Price
Change %
LAUR100%
-0.26%
PRDO - LAUR
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
STRA - LAUR
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
LOPE - LAUR
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
BCO - LAUR
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
AZZ - LAUR
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

LOPE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOPE has been loosely correlated with PRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOPE jumps, then PRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOPE
1D Price
Change %
LOPE100%
-3.19%
PRDO - LOPE
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
STRA - LOPE
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
LAUR - LOPE
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
CTAS - LOPE
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
MSA - LOPE
45%
Loosely correlated
+9.13%
More