LAUR
Price
$38.31
Change
-$0.10 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
5.28B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STRA
Price
$84.47
Change
+$2.46 (+3.00%)
Updated
Aug 3, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.85B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAUR vs STRA

LAUR vs STRA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Laureate Education (LAUR) vs. Strategic Education (STRA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • LAUR has delivered standout price momentum, gaining over 60% in the past year, driven by strong enrollment growth in Mexico and Peru and aggressive share repurchases.
  • STRA offers a more defensive profile with a 3%+ dividend yield, a lower P/E ratio near 13, and a rapidly expanding Education Technology Services (ETS) segment.
  • Both companies operate in higher education, but LAUR is concentrated in Latin America while STRA spans the U.S., Australia, and New Zealand, creating different risk and growth profiles.
  • STRA's ETS segment — which includes Sophia Learning and Workforce Edge — grew revenue roughly 46% year-over-year in recent quarters, positioning it as a key long-term growth catalyst.
  • Recent market activity has shown increased volatility in both names, with LAUR pulling back from its 52-week high and STRA experiencing a sharp single-day decline in mid-July 2026.

Introduction

The education services sector has drawn renewed investor attention as enrollment trends, digital transformation, and geographic diversification reshape the competitive landscape. LAUR (Laureate Education, Inc.) and STRA (Strategic Education, Inc.) represent two distinct approaches to capitalizing on global demand for higher education. LAUR concentrates on campus-based universities across Mexico and Peru, while STRA operates a diversified portfolio of online and campus-based institutions in the U.S. and Australia coupled with a fast-growing education technology arm. This comparison examines how each company is navigating the current market environment, and which stock an AI-driven analytical framework might favor based on observable trend data.

LAUR Overview and Recent Performance

Laureate Education, Inc. operates five higher education institutions across Mexico and Peru, serving approximately 497,700 students as of the end of 2025. The company offers undergraduate, graduate, and specialized degree programs in medicine, health sciences, engineering, business, and management through campus-based, online, and hybrid formats. LAUR has emerged as one of the stronger performers in the education sector over the past year, with its stock price appreciating more than 60% on a trailing 12-month basis.

The company's full-year 2025 results underscored robust operational momentum: total enrollments rose 5%, with new enrollments climbing 8%. Revenue increased 9% to $1.70 billion, while adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached $518.9 million, up from $450.1 million in 2024. Peru notably delivered 13% new enrollment growth. Management also announced a $150 million increase to the share repurchase authorization, bringing the total program to $400 million, signaling confidence in the company's valuation. The company's balance sheet remains strong, with a net cash position and minimal gross debt of $129.1 million.

In recent weeks, LAUR shares pulled back from their 52-week high of approximately $40.75, trading near $37.48, reflecting some profit-taking and broader market rotation. The forward outlook projects 4–5% total enrollment growth for 2026, with adjusted EPS (earnings per share) guidance of $1.95–$2.03. Currency exposure to the Mexican peso and Peruvian sol remains a risk factor that can influence reported results.

STRA Overview and Recent Performance

Strategic Education, Inc. operates through three segments: U.S. Higher Education (USHE), which includes Capella University and Strayer University; Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), centered on Torrens University; and Education Technology Services (ETS), which encompasses Sophia Learning and Workforce Edge. The company serves over 100,000 students globally and has increasingly emphasized employer partnerships and technology-enabled learning. STRA also maintains a quarterly cash dividend of $0.60 per share, translating to an annual yield above 3%.

The standout story for STRA in recent quarters has been the ETS segment, where revenue surged approximately 46% year-over-year in the most recently reported quarter. Sophia Learning, the company's low-cost online course platform, reported subscriber growth of roughly 40%. Workforce Edge, the employer education benefits administration platform, has partnered with 80 corporations covering approximately 3.87 million employees. These initiatives provide a high-margin growth engine that differentiates STRA from traditional education peers. Meanwhile, USHE enrollment declined modestly, though employer-affiliated enrollment reached a record 31.8% of the segment total, and the healthcare portfolio grew 8%.

The ANZ segment has faced headwinds from Australian regulatory changes affecting international student recruitment, though domestic enrollment has shown improvement. In recent market activity, STRA experienced elevated volatility, including a sharp single-day decline in mid-July 2026, bringing shares to the mid-$70s range from the mid-$80s. The stock currently trades at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio near 13, reflecting a more value-oriented profile compared to LAUR.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like LAUR and STRA, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway to hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the most suitable and best-performing bots for current market conditions earn a place in this curated section. These AI trading robots deploy diverse strategies — ranging from short-term day trading on 5-minute and 15-minute intervals to swing trading on 60-minute and daily timeframes — and have delivered annualized returns that can exceed 190% among top performers. Win rates frequently surpass 70%, with some bots achieving over 85% accuracy in pattern detection. Each bot operates with distinct risk management parameters, trading styles, and ticker selections, allowing users to find approaches aligned with their own market outlook. Explore the Trending AI Robots to discover which automated strategies are navigating today's markets most effectively.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most immediate contrast between LAUR and STRA lies in geographic and operational focus. LAUR is a pure-play on Latin American higher education, where favorable demographics, rising middle-class aspirations, and limited public university capacity support sustained enrollment growth. However, this concentration also introduces currency risk and exposure to regional economic and political cycles. STRA's diversification across the U.S. and Australia — supplemented by a rapidly growing ed-tech business — spreads risk but also means the company must navigate multiple regulatory environments simultaneously.

On valuation, the divergence is notable. LAUR trades at a P/E ratio of approximately 19.5 with no dividend, reflecting a growth premium supported by its recent momentum and enrollment trajectory. STRA trades at a P/E near 13 and offers a dividend yield above 3%, making it more appealing for income-oriented investors. On the growth front, LAUR has delivered superior top- and bottom-line expansion in percentage terms recently, while STRA's headline revenue growth has been more modest — though its high-margin ETS segment is accelerating rapidly.

Market sentiment has also diverged. LAUR has benefited from consistent upward momentum over the past year, though the recent pullback from highs suggests some cooling. STRA has traded essentially flat on a one-year basis, with a negative year-to-date return, indicating that its value characteristics and dividend have not yet translated into price appreciation. Both stocks carry low beta values (approximately 0.45–0.50), meaning they have been less volatile than the broader market.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, momentum metrics, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI framework would likely exhibit a near-term preference for LAUR over STRA. The sustained uptrend in LAUR's price, underpinned by expanding enrollments, strong free cash flow, and aggressive capital return initiatives, provides a more clearly defined trajectory that trend-following algorithms tend to favor. However, STRA's elevated dividend yield, lower valuation multiple, and high-growth ETS segment represent countervailing factors that could gain prominence if its price stabilizes and enrollment headwinds in the traditional segments ease. In probabilistic terms, LAUR currently exhibits stronger trend signals, while STRA presents a potentially attractive mean-reversion opportunity. The AI's choice would ultimately depend on the specific strategy employed — trend-following models would lean toward LAUR, while value-oriented or dividend-focused bots might find STRA more compelling.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LAUR vs. STRA commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAUR is a StrongBuy and STRA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (LAUR: $38.31 vs. STRA: $82.00)
Brand notoriety: LAUR and STRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAUR: 75% vs. STRA: 64%
Market capitalization -- LAUR: $5.28B vs. STRA: $1.85B
LAUR [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $5.28B. STRA’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $1.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $9.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAUR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAUR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAUR is a better buy in the long-term than STRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAUR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAUR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STRA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STRA is a better buy in the short-term than LAUR.

Price Growth

LAUR (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +3.54% price change this week, while STRA (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +8.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +7.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAUR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

STRA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+7.28% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAUR($5.28B) has a higher market cap than STRA($1.85B). LAUR has higher P/E ratio than STRA: LAUR (17.33) vs STRA (13.69). LAUR YTD gains are higher at: 13.781 vs. STRA (3.784). LAUR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 578M vs. STRA (249M). LAUR has more cash in the bank: 162M vs. STRA (129M). STRA has less debt than LAUR: STRA (107M) vs LAUR (734M). LAUR has higher revenues than STRA: LAUR (1.83B) vs STRA (1.29B).
LAURSTRALAUR / STRA
Capitalization5.28B1.85B285%
EBITDA578M249M232%
Gain YTD13.7813.784364%
P/E Ratio17.3313.69127%
Revenue1.83B1.29B142%
Total Cash162M129M126%
Total Debt734M107M686%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAUR vs STRA: Fundamental Ratings
LAUR
STRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
276
SMR RATING
1..100
3578
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2665
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STRA's Valuation (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAUR (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that STRA’s stock grew significantly faster than LAUR’s over the last 12 months.

LAUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for STRA (76) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew significantly faster than STRA’s over the last 12 months.

LAUR's SMR Rating (35) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STRA (78) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STRA’s over the last 12 months.

LAUR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as STRA (49) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to STRA’s over the last 12 months.

LAUR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STRA (65) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than STRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAURSTRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STRA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSMU63.650.23
+0.37%
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
LTAX24.91N/A
N/A
Nomura Tax Free USA ETF
NYF52.89-0.02
-0.04%
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
TMFX23.05-0.17
-0.74%
Motley Fool Next ETF
XTWY35.24-0.32
-0.90%
BondBloxx Bloomberg TwentyYrTrgDuUSTrETF

LAUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAUR has been loosely correlated with PRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAUR jumps, then PRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAUR
1D Price
Change %
LAUR100%
-0.26%
PRDO - LAUR
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
STRA - LAUR
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
LOPE - LAUR
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
BCO - LAUR
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
AZZ - LAUR
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More