Advertisement
LBRDA vs TMUS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBRDA is a Hold and TMUS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LBRDA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LBRDA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TMUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LBRDA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LBRDA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TMUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LBRDA (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while TMUS (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +0.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
LBRDA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
TMUS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.69% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| LBRDA | TMUS | LBRDA / TMUS | |
| Capitalization | 4.61B | 192B | 2% |
| EBITDA | -3.16B | 31.8B | -10% |
| Gain YTD | -35.149 | -9.104 | 386% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.44 | 19.13 | 34% |
| Revenue | 0 | 90.5B | - |
| Total Cash | 51M | 3.52B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 2.57B | 121B | 2% |
LBRDA | TMUS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TMUS's Valuation (41) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBRDA (85) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TMUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
TMUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBRDA (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TMUS’s stock grew similarly to LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
TMUS's SMR Rating (48) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBRDA (98) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TMUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
TMUS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBRDA (84) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TMUS’s stock grew similarly to LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
TMUS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBRDA (94) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that TMUS’s stock grew similarly to LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
| LBRDA | TMUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 57% | 9 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 19 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BME | 43.65 | 0.62 | +1.44% |
| Blackrock Health Sciences Trust | |||
| SPVM | 75.53 | 0.84 | +1.12% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | |||
| CRED | 22.77 | 0.11 | +0.50% |
| Columbia Research Enhanced Rl Estt ETF | |||
| BBCA | 99.69 | 0.17 | +0.17% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | |||
| KAUG | 28.65 | N/A | +0.02% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Aug | |||
LBRDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDA has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDA jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBRDA | 100% | N/A | ||
| LBRDK - LBRDA | 100% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CHTR - LBRDA | 100% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CMCSA - LBRDA | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SHEN - LBRDA | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LBRDP - LBRDA | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TMUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMUS has been loosely correlated with TEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMUS jumps, then TEO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS | 100% | N/A | ||
| TEO - TMUS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| CMCSA - TMUS | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| S - TMUS | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| LBRDA - TMUS | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LBRDK - TMUS | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||