LII
Price
$482.69
Change
-$18.72 (-3.73%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
16.8B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TT
Price
$448.01
Change
-$12.41 (-2.70%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
99.04B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LII vs TT

Header iconLII vs TT Comparison
Open Charts LII vs TTBanner chart's image
LII vs TT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lennox International (LII) vs. Trane Technologies (TT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both LII and TT operate in the HVAC sector, with recent Q1 2026 earnings beats driving positive sentiment.
  • TT shows stronger YTD performance at ~23% versus LII's ~8%, reflecting robust commercial demand and a record backlog.
  • LII trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio (~23x) compared to TT (~37x), suggesting relative value in residential-focused growth.
  • Recent market activity highlights TT's momentum from commercial HVAC strength, while LII benefits from acquisitions and Building Climate Solutions expansion.
  • Both stocks exhibit similar betas (~1.2-1.3), indicating comparable market sensitivity in the cyclical HVAC industry.
  • Dividend yields stand at 1.00% for LII and 0.88% for TT, appealing to income-focused investors.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines LII (Lennox International) and TT (Trane Technologies), two leading players in the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) sector. Both companies design and manufacture climate control solutions amid rising demand for energy-efficient systems driven by regulatory pressures and commercial retrofits. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term sector growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuation, and recent catalysts. In recent market activity, earnings beats and guidance updates have shaped sentiment, highlighting contrasts in residential versus commercial exposures.

LII Overview and Recent Performance

LII, headquartered in Richardson, Texas, designs, manufactures, and markets HVAC products for residential and commercial markets through its Home Comfort Solutions and Building Climate Solutions segments. The company reported Q1 2026 revenue of $1.1 billion, up 6% year-over-year, driven by acquisitions and Building Climate Solutions growth of 38% (26% organic). Adjusted EPS came in at $3.35, beating estimates by 6.7%, though segment margins dipped 130 basis points (bps) to 14.4% due to factory under-absorption. Recent weeks have seen shares trade around $522, up ~9% over the past month amid stabilized residential demand and raised full-year revenue guidance to ~8%. Sentiment has improved on operational resilience and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) momentum, despite softer home comfort volumes, positioning LII for recovery in a cyclical sector.

TT Overview and Recent Performance

TT, a global climate innovator based in Ireland, provides HVAC and refrigeration solutions via brands like Trane and Thermo King, serving buildings, transport, and residential needs. Q1 2026 results showed $5.0 billion in revenue, up 6% (3% organic), with adjusted continuing EPS of $2.63, up 7% and surpassing forecasts. Bookings surged 27% to support a record $10.7 billion backlog, fueled by Americas commercial HVAC demand. Shares hover near $477, reflecting ~12% monthly gains and YTD outperformance. Guidance was raised for full-year revenue (~9.5%) and EPS ($14.75-$14.95), bolstering confidence amid strong commercial momentum and efficiency gains, though residential softness lingers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a total of 351 bots that trade thousands of different tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend analysis, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors (typically 2-3% TP and 2-10% SL), operating on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Selected for current market conditions, they target growth sectors including semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and leveraged ETFs, with performance stats featuring annualized returns from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51%-88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Top examples include a multi-agent bot on USAR, SMR, CIFR (60min) at +169% annualized and 75% win rate, and a semiconductor bot (LRCX, TER, etc.) at +95% annualized. Traders can explore these for copy trading via signal, virtual, or brokerage agents. Visit Trending AI Robots to evaluate options suited to today’s volatility.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In the HVAC sector, LII emphasizes residential furnaces, air conditioners, and parts (via direct/distributor sales), while TT balances commercial HVAC, transport refrigeration, and global services with a broader footprint. Growth drivers diverge: LII leverages M&A and Building Climate organic expansion (26% Q1), versus TT's bookings surge and $10.7B backlog signaling sustained commercial tailwinds. Recent momentum favors TT (YTD +23%, 1-year +19%), outpacing LII (YTD +8%, 1-year -8%), tied to sector rotation toward commercial resilience. Valuation contrasts show LII at 3.45x price/sales and ~23x P/E (market cap $18B), more attractive than TT's 5.05x P/S and ~37x P/E ($106B cap), reflecting scale trade-offs. Risks include residential cyclicality for both (similar betas ~1.2), but TT faces higher currency exposure; sentiment tilts to TT on backlog visibility versus LII's margin pressures.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TT based on superior trend consistency, record backlog as a demand catalyst, and stronger relative YTD positioning amid commercial HVAC strength. While LII offers valuation appeal and acquisition-driven growth, TT's stability and raised guidance suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, though sector risks remain balanced.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
LII vs. TT commentary
May 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LII is a StrongBuy and TT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2026
Stock price -- (LII: $482.69 vs. TT: $448.01)
Brand notoriety: LII and TT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LII: 75% vs. TT: 97%
Market capitalization -- LII: $16.8B vs. TT: $99.04B
LII [@Building Products] is valued at $16.8B. TT’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $99.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $99.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LII’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TT is a better buy in the long-term than LII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LII’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LII and TT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LII (@Building Products) experienced а -5.09% price change this week, while TT (@Building Products) price change was -4.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

LII is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

TT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-1.86% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TT($99B) has a higher market cap than LII($16.8B). TT has higher P/E ratio than LII: TT (34.23) vs LII (21.44). TT YTD gains are higher at: 15.388 vs. LII (-0.303). TT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.26B vs. LII (1.15B). TT has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. LII (50.2M). LII has less debt than TT: LII (1.96B) vs TT (4.62B). TT has higher revenues than LII: TT (21.6B) vs LII (5.26B).
LIITTLII / TT
Capitalization16.8B99B17%
EBITDA1.15B4.26B27%
Gain YTD-0.30315.388-2%
P/E Ratio21.4434.2363%
Revenue5.26B21.6B24%
Total Cash50.2M1.07B5%
Total Debt1.96B4.62B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LII vs TT: Fundamental Ratings
LII
TT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5813
SMR RATING
1..100
1526
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LII's Valuation (73) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as TT (81) in the null industry. This means that LII’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LII (58) in the Building Products industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LII’s over the last 12 months.

LII's SMR Rating (15) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as TT (26) in the null industry. This means that LII’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LII (58) in the Building Products industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

TT's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LII (71) in the Building Products industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIITT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCB82.60-1.00
-1.20%
Ameris Bancorp
BN44.28-0.78
-1.73%
Brookfield Corporation
TG7.27-0.18
-2.42%
Tredegar Corp
WWW14.70-0.61
-3.98%
Wolverine World Wide
BIOX0.42-0.02
-4.15%
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp

LII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LII has been closely correlated with CARR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LII jumps, then CARR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LII
1D Price
Change %
LII100%
-3.73%
CARR - LII
74%
Closely correlated
-4.76%
IR - LII
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
OC - LII
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
FBIN - LII
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
MAS - LII
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
More

TT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TT has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TT jumps, then IR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TT
1D Price
Change %
TT100%
-2.70%
IR - TT
77%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
JCI - TT
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
CARR - TT
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.76%
LII - TT
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.73%
SPXC - TT
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
More