LII
Price
$390.53
Change
+$4.45 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
13.5B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMS
Price
$135.76
Change
+$0.93 (+0.69%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
10.24B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LII vs WMS

LII vs WMS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LII vs. WMS commentary
Sep 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LII is a StrongBuy and WMS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2026
Stock price -- (LII: $390.53 vs. WMS: $135.76)
Brand notoriety: LII and WMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LII: 85% vs. WMS: 78%
Market capitalization -- LII: $13.5B vs. WMS: $10.24B
LII [@Building Products] is valued at $13.5B. WMS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $98.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LII’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMS is a better buy in the long-term than LII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LII’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LII is a better buy in the short-term than WMS.

Price Growth

LII (@Building Products) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while WMS (@Building Products) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +4.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

LII is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

WMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+4.93% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LII($13.5B) has a higher market cap than WMS($10.2B). WMS has higher P/E ratio than LII: WMS (23.13) vs LII (17.35). WMS YTD gains are higher at: -5.890 vs. LII (-19.145). LII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.17B vs. WMS (925M). WMS has more cash in the bank: 162M vs. LII (52.1M). WMS has less debt than LII: WMS (1.77B) vs LII (2.03B). LII has higher revenues than WMS: LII (5.3B) vs WMS (3.22B).
LIIWMSLII / WMS
Capitalization13.5B10.2B132%
EBITDA1.17B925M126%
Gain YTD-19.145-5.890325%
P/E Ratio17.3523.1375%
Revenue5.3B3.22B165%
Total Cash52.1M162M32%
Total Debt2.03B1.77B115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LII vs WMS: Fundamental Ratings
LII
WMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8280
SMR RATING
1..100
1739
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7858
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LII's Valuation (53) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as WMS (62) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LII’s stock grew similarly to WMS’s over the last 12 months.

WMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LII (82) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

LII's SMR Rating (17) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as WMS (39) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LII’s stock grew similarly to WMS’s over the last 12 months.

WMS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LII (80) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

WMS's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LII (78) in the Building Products industry. This means that WMS’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIIWMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWI8.330.69
+9.03%
Titan International
MLI63.740.96
+1.52%
Mueller Industries Inc
PRVA20.66-0.01
-0.05%
Privia Health Group
LNZA6.12-0.11
-1.77%
LanzaTech Global Inc
MNDR1.42-0.11
-7.19%
Mobile-health Network Solutions

LII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LII has been closely correlated with CARR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LII jumps, then CARR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LII
1D Price
Change %
LII100%
+1.15%
CARR - LII
69%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
MAS - LII
67%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
IR - LII
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
TT - LII
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
BLDR - LII
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
More

WMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMS has been closely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMS
1D Price
Change %
WMS100%
+0.69%
BLDR - WMS
67%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
GFF - WMS
66%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
MAS - WMS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
OC - WMS
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.98%
LII - WMS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
More