Advertisement
LIN vs OLN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Linde plc (LIN) vs. Olin Corporation (OLN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LIN maintains a large market capitalization exceeding $212 billion and a consensus “Buy” rating from brokerages, supported by consistent earnings beats and exposure to high-growth areas like semiconductors.
- OLN has a significantly smaller market capitalization near $1.9 billion and has faced steeper year-to-date declines amid chemical sector pressures, offset by a recent major U.S. Army ammunition contract.
- Recent market activity shows LIN delivering revenue growth of approximately 9% year-over-year in its latest reported quarter, while OLN reported mixed results with a net loss but advancing merger discussions.
- LIN offers greater stability through its industrial gases business model and lower beta, contrasting with OLN’s higher volatility tied to commodity chemicals and defense-related revenues.
- Both companies operate in the broader materials sector, yet LIN benefits from diversified end markets including electronics and energy, while OLN emphasizes chlor-alkali products and ammunition.
- Relative positioning favors LIN for trend consistency in recent weeks, though OLN shows potential catalysts from contract wins and merger progress.
Introduction
Investors and traders evaluating opportunities in the materials sector often compare companies with differing scale, business models, and risk profiles. LIN and OLN represent two distinct approaches within chemicals and industrial products. LIN, a global leader in industrial gases, appeals to those seeking established cash flows and exposure to technology-driven demand. OLN, focused on commodity chemicals and ammunition, attracts attention from those monitoring cyclical recovery and defense spending. This comparison highlights relative performance, sector positioning, and recent developments to assist market participants in assessing trade-offs between stability and potential volatility.
LIN Overview and Recent Performance
LIN operates as the world’s largest industrial gases company, supplying atmospheric and process gases to industries including healthcare, manufacturing, electronics, and energy. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near $460 amid a market capitalization of approximately $212 billion. The company reported second-quarter results with revenue of $9.29 billion, up 9% year-over-year, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.50, exceeding estimates. Despite the beat, shares experienced pressure following the release due to margin considerations in certain segments. Broader sentiment remains supported by a growing project backlog, investments in semiconductor facilities, and a consistent dividend of $1.60 per quarter. Analysts maintain a consensus “Buy” rating with average price targets above current levels, reflecting confidence in long-term growth drivers such as electronics and hydrogen applications.
OLN Overview and Recent Performance
OLN produces chlor-alkali chemicals and owns the Winchester ammunition business, serving industrial, agricultural, and defense markets. The stock has traded around $17 in recent sessions with a market capitalization near $1.9 billion. In the latest reported quarter, the company posted sales of approximately $1.74 billion alongside a net loss, reflecting ongoing challenges in commodity pricing and volumes. Positive developments include shareholder approval and antitrust clearance for a proposed all-stock merger with Huntsman Corporation, as well as a $788 million U.S. Army contract awarded in mid-September for small-arms ammunition. These factors have introduced potential catalysts amid broader sector weakness, though the shares have declined notably over the past year amid cyclical headwinds in the chemicals industry.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing automated trading strategies from hundreds of available AI trading bots that execute trades across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions—based on metrics such as win rates, risk-adjusted returns, and consistency across varying timeframes and strategies—earn placement in this section. Available bots encompass diverse approaches, including trend-following, mean-reversion, and momentum styles, with performance statistics spanning short-term intraday to longer multi-week horizons. This dynamic curation helps traders identify tools aligned with current volatility and sector rotations. Explore the full list on the Trending AI Robots page to review detailed statistics and backtested results.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LIN and OLN differ markedly in scale and business focus. LIN benefits from a stable, asset-intensive model with recurring revenue from long-term supply contracts, lower beta around 0.72, and diversified exposure to electronics and energy transition themes. In contrast, OLN operates in more cyclical chlor-alkali markets and defense ammunition, resulting in higher volatility and sensitivity to commodity prices and government spending. Recent momentum favors LIN through consistent earnings delivery and institutional ownership above 80%, while OLN draws attention from discrete events such as the Army contract and merger advancement. Risk factors for LIN include margin pressures in non-core areas, whereas OLN contends with legacy liabilities and integration uncertainties from the proposed combination. Sector sentiment positions LIN as a defensive growth name and OLN as a higher-beta recovery candidate.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to LIN. The company’s larger scale, lower volatility, and sustained demand drivers in electronics and industrial applications support more predictable performance patterns compared with OLN’s exposure to commodity cycles and event-driven catalysts. This assessment remains probabilistic and reflects current data rather than forward guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIN is a Buy and OLN is a StrongBuy.
| LIN | OLN | LIN / OLN | |
| Capitalization | 212B | 1.92B | 11,047% |
| EBITDA | 13.6B | 410M | 3,317% |
| Gain YTD | 8.353 | -18.467 | -45% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.70 | 48.57 | 61% |
| Revenue | 35.4B | 6.7B | 528% |
| Total Cash | 4.9B | 177M | 2,767% |
| Total Debt | 28B | 3.41B | 822% |
LIN | OLN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLN's Valuation (15) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (75) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLN (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (48) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLN (94) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as OLN (79) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.
OLN's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (56) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
| LIN | OLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 48% | 15 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 72% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while OLN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OLN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OLN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while OLN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -2.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
OLN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.60% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-1.84% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BCOR | 29.12 | 2.49 | +9.35% |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF | |||
| TMFM | 21.52 | 0.25 | +1.15% |
| Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) | |||
| XRT | 82.56 | 0.53 | +0.65% |
| State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) | |||
| VTEI | 96.82 | -0.06 | -0.06% |
| Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEI) | |||
| CUT | 29.14 | -0.17 | -0.59% |
| Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) | |||
LIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with OLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then OLN could also see price increases.
OLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OLN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.