Linde plc (LIN) and Olin Corporation (OLN) both compete in the basic materials sector, with exposure to chemicals and industrial products, making them relevant for investors tracking sector rotation amid economic shifts. LIN focuses on essential industrial gases, while OLN spans chlor-alkali chemicals, epoxy resins, and ammunition. This comparison highlights their relative performance, business drivers, and market positioning in recent market activity. Traders seeking stability versus cyclical upside, or those evaluating materials stocks for portfolio diversification, will find insights into momentum, valuation, and risk factors.
Linde plc (LIN) is a global leader in industrial gases, supplying oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen to healthcare, manufacturing, and electronics sectors. Trading around $510 per share with a market capitalization over $236 billion, the stock has exhibited resilience with a YTD gain of about 20% and a 3% rise in the past month. Recent weeks have seen positive sentiment driven by analyst upgrades, recognition as one of the World's Most Ethical Companies, and a Q2 2026 dividend declaration. A record $10 billion project backlog and anticipated Q1 earnings growth have bolstered confidence, despite broader market fluctuations. Lower beta (0.79) underscores its defensive positioning.
Olin Corporation (OLN) manufactures chemicals including chlorine and caustic soda, epoxy products, and Winchester ammunition for sporting and defense markets. At approximately $27 per share and a $3 billion market cap, it has achieved a strong YTD return of nearly 30%, though it declined about 7% over the recent month. Influences include a recent share price pullback amid profitability challenges (negative EPS of -$0.88) and mixed financials, offset by Citi's price target increase and a Q1 earnings call announcement. Higher beta (1.37) reflects sensitivity to commodity cycles and economic conditions.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top automated trading solutions from over 351 AI Trading Bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and risk levels. Only the 25 best-performing bots, selected for their suitability to current market conditions, earn a spot in this section—featuring high win rates, positive average returns, substantial trade volumes, and robust statistics like profit factors exceeding 1.5 in many cases. These include signal agents for short-term trades, virtual agents for pattern recognition, and brokerage agents for portfolio management. Traders benefit from varied styles, from momentum scalping to swing trading, enabling copy trading with transparency. Explore these tools to enhance strategies in volatile environments.
LIN and OLN differ markedly in scale and stability: LIN's recurring revenue from essential gases contrasts OLN's exposure to volatile commodities and defense spending. Growth drivers favor LIN with its massive backlog and expansions, while OLN relies on chemical pricing and ammunition demand. Recent momentum shows LIN's consistency versus OLN's pullback; valuation metrics highlight LIN's premium P/E (price-to-earnings ratio, ~35) tied to 20% profit margins against OLN's elevated P/E (~49) amid losses. Risk factors include OLN's higher debt/equity (168%) and beta, amplifying sector downturns, while LIN offers lower volatility. Market sentiment leans positive for LIN via ethical accolades and targets, with OLN showing analyst support despite challenges.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward LIN for its superior trend consistency, robust profitability, lower risk profile (beta 0.79), and catalysts like earnings growth expectations and backlog strength. While OLN offers higher YTD upside potential in a cyclical recovery, its recent momentum fade and negative earnings introduce elevated uncertainty. This positioning suggests LIN may have a probabilistic edge in the near term for balanced portfolios.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOLN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while OLN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -14.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -6.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.67%.
LIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
OLN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-6.41% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| LIN | OLN | LIN / OLN | |
| Capitalization | 239B | 2.46B | 9,735% |
| EBITDA | 13.4B | 408M | 3,284% |
| Gain YTD | 21.974 | 4.968 | 442% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.26 | 48.57 | 71% |
| Revenue | 34.7B | 6.72B | 516% |
| Total Cash | 3.96B | 192M | 2,062% |
| Total Debt | 26.3B | 3.31B | 794% |
LIN | OLN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 8 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLN's Valuation (17) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LIN (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLN (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLN (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as OLN (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.
OLN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
| LIN | OLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 48% | 9 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then DD could also see price increases.