This comparison examines Linde plc (LIN) and Olin Corporation (OLN), two companies in the materials sector with overlapping yet distinct exposures to industrial and chemical markets. LIN provides industrial gases and engineering solutions on a global scale, while OLN focuses on chlor-alkali products, epoxies, and ammunition. The analysis highlights recent performance trends, business fundamentals, and market positioning to assist traders evaluating relative opportunities in defensive versus cyclical segments. Investors monitoring sector rotation or seeking contrasts in stability and growth drivers may find this review relevant for portfolio allocation decisions.
Linde plc (LIN) is the world's largest industrial gases company, serving sectors including healthcare, manufacturing, and energy with a focus on long-term supply contracts. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near record levels, supported by steady demand and productivity initiatives. Year-to-date returns have outpaced the broader market, reflecting investor preference for the company's defensive qualities during periods of uncertainty. First-quarter 2026 results showed adjusted earnings growth and raised full-year guidance, with operating margins remaining robust. Upcoming second-quarter earnings, scheduled for late July, represent a key near-term catalyst. Overall sentiment has remained constructive, aided by consistent dividend increases and exposure to stable end markets.
Olin Corporation (OLN) produces chlor-alkali chemicals, epoxy resins, and ammunition, with operations sensitive to raw material costs and industrial demand cycles. Recent market activity has seen the stock experience downward pressure, including notable declines over the past month amid weaker quarterly results. The first-quarter 2026 report showed a net loss and reduced adjusted EBITDA compared to the prior year, influenced by lower pricing and volumes in certain segments. Despite these headwinds, the company maintains liquidity and continues its dividend program. Performance has lagged broader materials indices in the near term, with trading ranges reflecting caution around commodity exposure and economic sensitivity.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from a large library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit varied statistics, including annualized returns ranging up to over 200 percent in select cases, win rates between 70 and 95 percent, and profit factors reaching 2.5 to 12.5 or higher depending on strategy. Each robot employs distinct trading styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, from momentum-based approaches to sector rotation. Traders can review detailed forward-testing metrics such as Sharpe ratios and drawdowns before deployment. Explore the curated selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots aligned with individual objectives.
LIN and OLN differ significantly in business model and scale. LIN operates a capital-intensive but highly contracted industrial gases franchise with global diversification, supporting more predictable cash flows. OLN’s chlor-alkali and related businesses face greater cyclicality tied to construction, automotive, and chemical pricing. Growth drivers for LIN include efficiency programs and expanding applications in electronics and energy transition, while OLN contends with margin compression risks from input costs. Recent momentum has favored LIN’s stability near highs versus OLN’s pullback. Risk factors include LIN’s exposure to currency and energy costs, contrasted with OLN’s higher leverage and commodity volatility. Sector sentiment currently leans toward defensive materials names like LIN over more cyclical peers.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a higher probability of favor to Linde plc (LIN) in the current environment. LIN’s stronger year-to-date performance, margin resilience, and upcoming catalysts provide a more consistent profile compared to OLN’s recent challenges. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of historical patterns and momentum indicators rather than guarantees of future outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOLN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.05% price change this week, while OLN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was +7.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.13%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.49%.
LIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
OLN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (+3.32% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| LIN | OLN | LIN / OLN | |
| Capitalization | 242B | 2.41B | 10,037% |
| EBITDA | 13.4B | 408M | 3,284% |
| Gain YTD | 23.709 | 3.068 | 773% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.75 | 48.57 | 72% |
| Revenue | 34.7B | 6.72B | 516% |
| Total Cash | 3.96B | 192M | 2,062% |
| Total Debt | 26.3B | 3.31B | 794% |
LIN | OLN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 8 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLN's Valuation (16) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLN (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLN (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLN (77) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.
OLN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (48) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.
| LIN | OLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 48% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 44% | 13 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PFFV | 22.00 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | |||
| HQGO | 66.03 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | |||
| LIAM | 232.97 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2055 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF | |||
| BCLO | 49.47 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF | |||
| DFEV | 40.75 | -1.25 | -2.98% |
| Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then DD could also see price increases.