Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGRX vs RERFX
LMGRX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts LMGRX vs RERFX
LMGRX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGRX vs. RERFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGRX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. LMGRX (7.46B). RERFX pays higher dividends than LMGRX: RERFX (2.67) vs LMGRX (1.09). LMGRX was incepted earlier than RERFX: LMGRX (20 years) vs RERFX (24 years). LMGRX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). LMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERFX (50.00). LMGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: LMGRX (0) vs RERFX (250). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. LMGRX (11.67). LMGRX return over 5 years is better than : 16.81 vs. RERFX (-0.56).
| LMGRX | RERFX | LMGRX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.52 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.52 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.647 | 7.208 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.46B | 143B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 2.67 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.67 | 14.57 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.36 | 28.31 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.81 | -0.56 | -2,978% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.88 | 64.85 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement