Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGRX vs RERFX
LMGRX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts LMGRX vs RERFX
LMGRX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGRX vs. RERFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGRX is a Buy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. LMGRX (6.64B). RERFX pays higher dividends than LMGRX: RERFX (2.67) vs LMGRX (1.12). LMGRX was incepted earlier than RERFX: LMGRX (20 years) vs RERFX (24 years). LMGRX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). LMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERFX (50.00). LMGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: LMGRX (0) vs RERFX (250). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. LMGRX (-4.76). LMGRX return over 5 years is better than : 3.32 vs. RERFX (-3.16).
| LMGRX | RERFX | LMGRX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.52 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.52 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.721 | 7.142 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 140B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 2.67 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | 4.92 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.94 | 29.66 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.32 | -3.16 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.88 | 50.26 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement