LMND
Price
$57.49
Change
+$0.31 (+0.54%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.42B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$48.44
Change
+$0.72 (+1.51%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMND vs UFCS

Header iconLMND vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts LMND vs UFCSBanner chart's image
LMND vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMND vs. UFCS commentary
Jun 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMND is a Hold and UFCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 13, 2026
Stock price -- (LMND: $57.49 vs. UFCS: $48.43)
Brand notoriety: LMND and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMND: 74% vs. UFCS: 63%
Market capitalization -- LMND: $4.42B vs. UFCS: $1.24B
LMND [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $4.42B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $127.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $12.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than LMND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LMND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the short-term than LMND.

Price Growth

LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +11.72% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +7.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMND is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMND($4.42B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($1.24B). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 34.551 vs. LMND (-19.233). UFCS has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. LMND (578M). UFCS has less debt than LMND: UFCS (146M) vs LMND (200M). UFCS has higher revenues than LMND: UFCS (1.43B) vs LMND (845M).
LMNDUFCSLMND / UFCS
Capitalization4.42B1.24B355%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.23334.551-56%
P/E RatioN/A9.76-
Revenue845M1.43B59%
Total Cash578M1.34B43%
Total Debt200M146M137%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMND vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
LMND
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
10061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (37) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMND (90) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (61) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as LMND (52) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to LMND’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMND (100) in the null industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMNDUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XDAT24.290.40
+1.66%
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
DFAE40.070.19
+0.48%
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Mkt ETF
KRMA47.320.20
+0.42%
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
EPSV29.83N/A
N/A
Harbor Smid Cap Value ETF
WIW8.46-0.03
-0.35%
Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund

LMND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with HIPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then HIPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMND
1D Price
Change %
LMND100%
+0.54%
HIPO - LMND
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
ROOT - LMND
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
BNT - LMND
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
TRUP - LMND
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
PLMR - LMND
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+1.49%
HIG - UFCS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
CINF - UFCS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
DGICA - UFCS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
SAFT - UFCS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
THG - UFCS
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More