LRNZ
Price
$61.92
Change
-$1.81 (-2.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
40.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$114.64
Change
-$2.58 (-2.20%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
170.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRNZ vs VGT

LRNZ vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)

Key Takeaways

  • TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is an actively managed thematic fund with a concentrated portfolio of approximately 24 holdings focused on companies deriving significant revenue from artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and deep learning technologies.
  • Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is a low-cost passive ETF tracking a broad information technology index with over 320 holdings, providing diversified exposure across the entire sector.
  • LRNZ carries a higher expense ratio of 0.69% compared to VGT’s 0.09%, reflecting its active management and specialized AI focus versus broad market indexing.
  • Sector allocation for both centers on information technology, but LRNZ emphasizes AI application leaders while VGT spans hardware, software, semiconductors, and IT services more evenly.
  • LRNZ offers higher potential volatility due to its concentrated thematic strategy, whereas VGT provides broader diversification and typically lower relative risk within the technology space.
  • Both ETFs target growth-oriented investors seeking technology exposure, but they differ in strategy type: active thematic versus passive broad-sector indexing.

Introduction

Technology sector exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have gained prominence amid rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and digital transformation. TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) both provide equity exposure within information technology but pursue distinct strategies. LRNZ delivers concentrated, active exposure to AI-driven companies, while VGT offers broad, passive access to the full information technology sector. Investors comparing these funds evaluate trade-offs between specialized thematic positioning and diversified, cost-efficient sector coverage.

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) Overview

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is an actively managed ETF launched in 2020. It seeks to provide thematic exposure to a concentrated portfolio of technology companies significantly involved in the application of advanced levels of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or deep learning within their businesses. The fund typically holds 20-30 securities, emphasizing firms with competitive advantages or substantial revenue from these technologies. Top holdings often include companies such as CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. (CRWD), Cloudflare Inc. (NET), and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Sector allocation is heavily weighted toward information technology. The expense ratio stands at 0.69%. As an actively managed thematic product, it employs discretionary security selection rather than strict index replication, with periodic rebalancing based on fundamental and thematic criteria.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market 25/50 Information Technology Index. Launched in 2004, it provides broad exposure to U.S. companies in the information technology sector, including hardware, software, semiconductors, and IT services. The fund holds approximately 326-329 securities. Top holdings typically feature NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), and Micron Technology Inc. (MU). Sector allocation is concentrated in information technology with minimal exposure outside the index. The expense ratio is 0.09%. As a passive index-tracking ETF, it uses full replication with quarterly rebalancing aligned to index changes, delivering cost-efficient, diversified sector exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The information technology sector continues to benefit from structural tailwinds including accelerating AI adoption, cloud computing expansion, semiconductor demand, and enterprise digitalization. Macroeconomic drivers such as capital expenditure cycles by hyperscale providers and regulatory developments around data privacy and technology competition influence both funds. Sector risks include valuation compression during periods of higher interest rates, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical tensions affecting semiconductor and hardware supply. Capital flows into technology-themed and broad-sector ETFs remain robust, reflecting sustained investor interest in innovation-driven growth despite cyclical volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, LRNZ has exhibited greater sensitivity to AI-specific news and earnings momentum from its concentrated holdings, leading to potentially amplified moves during technology rallies or rotations. VGT, with its broader holdings and lower cost structure, has delivered more stable participation in overall information technology sector performance. Relative positioning shows LRNZ as a higher-conviction thematic vehicle suited for investors emphasizing AI disruption, while VGT serves as a core holding for diversified technology exposure. Volatility differences stem primarily from concentration levels, with the active thematic approach introducing additional idiosyncratic risk compared to the index-based diversification of VGT.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like LRNZ and VGT may find the platform useful for ongoing analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic preference to VGT for most investors due to its significantly lower expense ratio, greater diversification across hundreds of holdings, and established passive methodology that aligns with broad information technology sector momentum. LRNZ may appeal in scenarios prioritizing concentrated AI thematic exposure, though its higher costs and narrower focus introduce elevated risk considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LRNZ vs. VGT commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRNZ is a Buy and VGT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 170B vs. LRNZ (40.3M). LRNZ has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT: LRNZ (29.934) vs VGT (21.815). LRNZ was incepted earlier than VGT: LRNZ (6 years) vs VGT (22 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than LRNZ (0.69). LRNZ has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) vs VGT (8.00).
LRNZVGTLRNZ / VGT
Gain YTD29.93421.815137%
Net Assets40.3M170B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.690.09767%
Turnover28.008.00350%
Yield0.000.36-
Fund Existence6 years22 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRNZVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRNZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAVA80.180.35
+0.44%
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
XBB40.850.07
+0.18%
BondBloxx BB Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
RCAX4.68N/A
N/A
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RCAT ETF
TOPT32.68-0.16
-0.49%
iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF
DBEM39.32-0.68
-1.70%
Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eq ETF

LRNZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRNZ has been closely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRNZ jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRNZ
1D Price
Change %
LRNZ100%
-2.83%
NET - LRNZ
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
SNOW - LRNZ
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
TWLO - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
AI - LRNZ
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
VRNS - LRNZ
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More