LSBK
Price
$17.04
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
133.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNFP
Price
$100.14
Change
-$0.33 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSBK vs PNFP

LSBK vs PNFP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSBK vs. PNFP commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSBK is a Hold and PNFP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (LSBK: $17.04 vs. PNFP: $100.14)
Brand notoriety: LSBK and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSBK: 10% vs. PNFP: 82%
Market capitalization -- LSBK: $133.35M vs. PNFP: $15.13B
LSBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $133.35M. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSBK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the long-term than LSBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSBK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than LSBK.

Price Growth

LSBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($15.1B) has a higher market cap than LSBK($133M). LSBK has higher P/E ratio than PNFP: LSBK (15.56) vs PNFP (13.93). LSBK YTD gains are higher at: 17.584 vs. PNFP (6.017). PNFP has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. LSBK (3.04M). LSBK has less debt than PNFP: LSBK (2M) vs PNFP (5.74B). PNFP has higher revenues than LSBK: PNFP (2.54B) vs LSBK (29M).
LSBKPNFPLSBK / PNFP
Capitalization133M15.1B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.5846.017292%
P/E Ratio15.5613.93112%
Revenue29M2.54B1%
Total Cash3.04M295M1%
Total Debt2M5.74B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSBK vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
LSBK
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8722
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5380
SMR RATING
1..100
7918
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6480
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNFP's Valuation (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (63) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

LSBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSBK (79) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

LSBK's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

LSBK's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSBKPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNFP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPIX6.540.61
+10.29%
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals
DKL55.070.86
+1.59%
Delek Logistics Partners LP
NVR6437.99-41.40
-0.64%
NVR
KE24.67-0.69
-2.72%
Kimball Electronics
HTCR2.97-0.11
-3.57%
Heartcore Enterprises Inc.

LSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSBK has been loosely correlated with MGYR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSBK jumps, then MGYR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSBK
1D Price
Change %
LSBK100%
-0.06%
MGYR - LSBK
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
PNFP - LSBK
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
OPHC - LSBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
HAFC - LSBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
CFBK - LSBK
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More