Advertisement
LSF vs USNA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Hold and USNA is a StrongBuy.
LSF | USNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LSF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as USNA (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LSF’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.
LSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as USNA (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LSF’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.
USNA's SMR Rating (92) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as LSF (97) in the null industry. This means that USNA’s stock grew similarly to LSF’s over the last 12 months.
LSF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as USNA (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LSF’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.
USNA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for LSF (100) in the null industry. This means that USNA’s stock grew significantly faster than LSF’s over the last 12 months.
| LSF | USNA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 60% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while USNA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- USNA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USNA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- USNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LSF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while USNA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
LSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
USNA is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-3.69% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| STOCK / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLSS | 0.41 | 0.01 | +1.97% |
| Milestone Scientific | |||
| SMHX | 61.75 | 1.14 | +1.88% |
| VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) | |||
| BUFZ | 28.56 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| FT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) | |||
| FLSW | 40.69 | -0.09 | -0.22% |
| Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) | |||
| FUTG | 3.71 | -0.30 | -7.52% |
| Leverage Shares 2x Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) | |||
LSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and NATR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and NATR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSF | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| NATR - LSF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
| FAMI - LSF | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.47% | ||
| PETZ - LSF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| USNA - LSF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| BOF - LSF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
USNA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USNA has been loosely correlated with NAGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USNA jumps, then NAGE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USNA | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| NAGE - USNA | 39% Loosely correlated | -8.22% | ||
| HLF - USNA | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| NATR - USNA | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| CENTA - USNA | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| KHC - USNA | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||