Advertisement
LTC vs MPT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTC is a Hold and MPT is a Hold.
LTC | MPT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MPT's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as LTC (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MPT’s stock grew similarly to LTC’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPT (100) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew significantly faster than MPT’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's SMR Rating (64) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MPT (91) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew similarly to MPT’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPT (79) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPT’s over the last 12 months.
LTC's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MPT (100) in the null industry. This means that LTC’s stock grew similarly to MPT’s over the last 12 months.
| LTC | MPT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | about 1 month ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MPT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MPT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LTC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LTC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MPT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LTC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -1.59% price change this week, while MPT (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -6.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
LTC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
MPT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-2.52% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUYB | 41.26 | 0.21 | +0.52% |
| ProShares S&P 500 Buyback Aristocrats ETF (BUYB) | |||
| IDU | 101.30 | 0.46 | +0.46% |
| iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) | |||
| ARKI | 23.62 | N/A | N/A |
| ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF (ARKI) | |||
| XBJA | 34.68 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) | |||
| HYZD | 22.25 | -0.13 | -0.56% |
| WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) | |||
LTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTC has been closely correlated with NHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTC jumps, then NHI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTC | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| NHI - LTC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| OHI - LTC | 74% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| CTRE - LTC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| VTR - LTC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| WELL - LTC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||
MPT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MPT and HR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPT and HR's prices will move in lockstep.