It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LUV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWARF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LUV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWARF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LUV (@Airlines) experienced а +4.69% price change this week, while NWARF (@Airlines) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.
LUV is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
LUV | NWARF | LUV / NWARF | |
Capitalization | 20.6B | 942M | 2,187% |
EBITDA | 1.87B | 7.48B | 25% |
Gain YTD | 21.061 | -5.304 | -397% |
P/E Ratio | 227.92 | 7.17 | 3,178% |
Revenue | 27.4B | 33B | 83% |
Total Cash | 9.38B | 11.5B | 82% |
Total Debt | 9.1B | 15.3B | 59% |
LUV | NWARF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LUV's Valuation (84) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as NWARF (85) in the null industry. This means that LUV’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.
LUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as NWARF (100) in the null industry. This means that LUV’s stock grew similarly to NWARF’s over the last 12 months.
NWARF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LUV (89) in the Airlines industry. This means that NWARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LUV’s over the last 12 months.
LUV's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Airlines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWARF (74) in the null industry. This means that LUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.
LUV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Airlines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWARF (93) in the null industry. This means that LUV’s stock grew significantly faster than NWARF’s over the last 12 months.
LUV | NWARF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago89% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago76% | 13 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUV has been loosely correlated with ALGT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUV jumps, then ALGT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that NWARF and LUV have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWARF and LUV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWARF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NWARF | 100% | +0.12% | ||
LUV - NWARF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
ALGT - NWARF | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.48% | ||
ICAGY - NWARF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
QABSY - NWARF | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
JETMF - NWARF | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.53% | ||
More |