LW vs MDLZ ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and MDLZ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +2.87% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2023.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.49% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| LW | MDLZ | LW / MDLZ | |
| Capitalization | 16.3B | 100B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 1.03B | 6.12B | 17% |
| Gain YTD | 27.423 | 12.046 | 228% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.85 | 25.58 | 117% |
| Revenue | 4.81B | 32.9B | 15% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.92B | - |
| Total Debt | 3.25B | 22.7B | 14% |
LW | MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (23) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's SMR Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
LW's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (50) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (76) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.
| LW | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 49% |
LW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with POST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then POST could also see price increases.
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with K. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then K could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| K - MDLZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| SJM - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| HSY - MDLZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||