Price
$113.26
Change
+$1.21 (+1.08%)
Updated
Jun 2, 6:59 PM EST
GET INTRADAY SIGNALS
54 days until earnings call
Price
$74.27
Change
+$0.66 (+0.90%)
Updated
Jun 2, 6:59 PM EST
GET INTRADAY SIGNALS
53 days until earnings call

LW vs MDLZ ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconLW vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts LW vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$113.26
Change+$1.21 (+1.08%)
Volume$274.6K
CapitalizationN/A
GET INTRADAY SIGNALS
Mondelez International
Price$74.27
Change+$0.66 (+0.90%)
Volume$2.48M
CapitalizationN/A
GET INTRADAY SIGNALS
View a ticker or compare two or three
LW vs MDLZ Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
LW vs. MDLZ commentary
Jun 03, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and MDLZ is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2023
Stock price -- (LW: $112.07 vs. MDLZ: $73.61)
Brand notoriety: LW: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 83% vs. MDLZ: 93%
Market capitalization -- LW: $16.33B vs. MDLZ: $100.25B
LW [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $16.33B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $100.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $320.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $7.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than LW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +2.87% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2023.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.49% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LW with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MDLZ with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($100B) has a higher market cap than LW($16.3B). LW has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ: LW (29.85) vs MDLZ (25.58). LW YTD gains are higher at: 27.423 vs. MDLZ (12.046). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.12B vs. LW (1.03B). LW has less debt than MDLZ: LW (3.25B) vs MDLZ (22.7B). MDLZ has higher revenues than LW: MDLZ (32.9B) vs LW (4.81B).
LWMDLZLW / MDLZ
Capitalization16.3B100B16%
EBITDA1.03B6.12B17%
Gain YTD27.42312.046228%
P/E Ratio29.8525.58117%
Revenue4.81B32.9B15%
Total CashN/A1.92B-
Total Debt3.25B22.7B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
LW
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8570
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
235
SMR RATING
1..100
1359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7632
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (23) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (50) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (76) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KRO8.820.58
+7.10%
Kronos Worldwide
CYN0.960.03
+3.25%
Cyngn
RELL16.750.36
+2.20%
Richardson Electronics Ltd
VIR27.290.40
+1.49%
Vir Biotechnology
EA127.67-0.02
-0.02%
Electronic Arts

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with POST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then POST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+1.06%
POST - LW
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
CAG - LW
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
MDLZ - LW
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
TWNK - LW
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.17%
FLO - LW
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with K. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then K could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.90%
K - MDLZ
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
MKC - MDLZ
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
CAG - MDLZ
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
SJM - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
HSY - MDLZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More