LW
Price
$51.07
Change
-$0.25 (-0.49%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
8 days until earnings call
MDLZ
Price
$67.64
Change
+$0.46 (+0.68%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
94.25B
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LW vs MDLZ

Header iconLW vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts LW vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$51.07
Change-$0.25 (-0.49%)
Volume$2.51M
Capitalization15.38B
Mondelez International
Price$67.64
Change+$0.46 (+0.68%)
Volume$5.32M
Capitalization94.25B
LW vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. MDLZ commentary
Jul 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 15, 2025
Stock price -- (LW: $51.07 vs. MDLZ: $67.64)
Brand notoriety: LW: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 129% vs. MDLZ: 78%
Market capitalization -- LW: $15.38B vs. MDLZ: $94.25B
LW [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $15.38B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $94.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than LW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+3.51% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($94.3B) has a higher market cap than LW($15.4B). MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than LW: MDLZ (19.27) vs LW (13.62). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 14.831 vs. LW (-22.571). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.65B vs. LW (1.34B). LW has less debt than MDLZ: LW (3.63B) vs MDLZ (19.9B). MDLZ has higher revenues than LW: MDLZ (36B) vs LW (6.35B).
LWMDLZLW / MDLZ
Capitalization15.4B94.3B16%
EBITDA1.34B7.65B18%
Gain YTD-22.57114.831-152%
P/E Ratio13.6219.2771%
Revenue6.35B36B18%
Total CashN/A1.81B-
Total Debt3.63B19.9B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
LW
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6767
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
4259
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
927
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (45) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (27) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NXG49.060.22
+0.45%
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
NDMO10.140.02
+0.20%
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund
BLV67.83-0.11
-0.16%
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
RSSY18.66-0.10
-0.51%
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
HYDR23.67-0.73
-2.99%
Global X Hydrogen ETF

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-0.49%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POST - LW
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
THS - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
INGR - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
KHC - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.68%
GIS - MDLZ
67%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
KHC - MDLZ
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
CPB - MDLZ
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
MKC - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
HSY - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More