LW
Price
$56.99
Change
+$2.33 (+4.26%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
7.94B
38 days until earnings call
RSGUF
Price
$4.61
Change
+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
590.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LW vs RSGUF

Header iconLW vs RSGUF Comparison
Open Charts LW vs RSGUFBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$56.99
Change+$2.33 (+4.26%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization7.94B
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization590.03M
LW vs RSGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. RSGUF commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and RSGUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LW: $56.99 vs. RSGUF: $4.61)
Brand notoriety: LW and RSGUF are both not notable
LW represents the Food: Major Diversified, while RSGUF is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 53% vs. RSGUF: 69%
Market capitalization -- LW: $7.94B vs. RSGUF: $590.03M
LW [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $7.94B. RSGUF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $590.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.07B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $82.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSGUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than RSGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSGUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LW and RSGUF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +668.20%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.53% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.74% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($7.94B) has a higher market cap than RSGUF($590M). LW has higher P/E ratio than RSGUF: LW (22.80) vs RSGUF (13.05). RSGUF YTD gains are higher at: 12.714 vs. LW (-13.032). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.07B vs. RSGUF (145M). LW has more cash in the bank: 70.7M vs. RSGUF (26.6M). RSGUF has less debt than LW: RSGUF (381M) vs LW (4.16B). LW has higher revenues than RSGUF: LW (6.45B) vs RSGUF (1.3B).
LWRSGUFLW / RSGUF
Capitalization7.94B590M1,346%
EBITDA1.07B145M740%
Gain YTD-13.03212.714-102%
P/E Ratio22.8013.05175%
Revenue6.45B1.3B498%
Total Cash70.7M26.6M266%
Total Debt4.16B381M1,091%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs RSGUF: Fundamental Ratings
LW
RSGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2491
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
4451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1169
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (44) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RSGUF (51) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (53) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSGUF (69) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWRSGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAAGX82.851.72
+2.12%
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Instl
GMCQX13.890.26
+1.91%
GMO US Equity VI
DFGEX10.980.16
+1.48%
DFA Global Real Estate Securities Port
PQEMX14.300.17
+1.20%
PGIM Quant Solutions EMs Eq R6
DRDIX26.710.21
+0.79%
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+4.26%
KHC - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
FLO - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
HRL - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
CAG - LW
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
CPB - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
More

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
+0.22%
LW - RSGUF
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.26%
DAR - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.43%
CIADY - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
PRBZF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More